Implementation of evidence-based interventions according to the Swedish National Guidelines for Strokecare: a nationwide survey among physiotherapists.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Sara Brycke, Anna Bråndal, Christina Brogårdh
{"title":"Implementation of evidence-based interventions according to the Swedish National Guidelines for Strokecare: a nationwide survey among physiotherapists.","authors":"Sara Brycke, Anna Bråndal, Christina Brogårdh","doi":"10.2340/jrm.v56.18444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate (i) to what extent physiotherapists (PTs) working in stroke rehabilitation in various parts of the stroke care chain have implemented interventions according to the national guidelines for stroke (NGS), (ii) facilitating and hindering factors for the implementation, and (iii) differences between various care settings.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>148 PTs working in stroke rehabilitation in various parts of the care chain in Sweden.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected by a web-based survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Task-specific training for walking (80-98%), impaired motor function (64-100%) and fall prevention (73-92%) were most implemented. Factors that facilitated implementation were: important to comply with the NGS, that PTs had confidence to perform the interventions, and that interventions were clearly described. Limited time, lack of resources, no clear goals or routines at the workplace hindered the implementation. Significant differences (p < 0.05) between the settings existed. Municipal and primary care reported most challenges in implementing the NGS and providing evidence-based interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most interventions, with high priority according to NGS, are provided by PTs working in stroke rehabilitation, although differences in various parts of the care chain exist. Knowledge, time, education and supportive management are important factors when implementing evidence-based interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10964026/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v56.18444","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate (i) to what extent physiotherapists (PTs) working in stroke rehabilitation in various parts of the stroke care chain have implemented interventions according to the national guidelines for stroke (NGS), (ii) facilitating and hindering factors for the implementation, and (iii) differences between various care settings.

Design: A cross-sectional study.

Subjects: 148 PTs working in stroke rehabilitation in various parts of the care chain in Sweden.

Methods: Data were collected by a web-based survey.

Results: Task-specific training for walking (80-98%), impaired motor function (64-100%) and fall prevention (73-92%) were most implemented. Factors that facilitated implementation were: important to comply with the NGS, that PTs had confidence to perform the interventions, and that interventions were clearly described. Limited time, lack of resources, no clear goals or routines at the workplace hindered the implementation. Significant differences (p < 0.05) between the settings existed. Municipal and primary care reported most challenges in implementing the NGS and providing evidence-based interventions.

Conclusion: Most interventions, with high priority according to NGS, are provided by PTs working in stroke rehabilitation, although differences in various parts of the care chain exist. Knowledge, time, education and supportive management are important factors when implementing evidence-based interventions.

根据《瑞典国家卒中护理指南》实施循证干预:一项针对物理治疗师的全国性调查。
目的调查:(i) 在中风治疗链的各个环节从事中风康复工作的物理治疗师(PTs)在多大程度上根据国家中风指南(NGS)实施了干预措施;(ii) 实施干预措施的促进因素和阻碍因素;(iii) 不同治疗环境之间的差异:设计:横断面研究:方法:通过网络调查收集数据:方法:通过网络调查收集数据:结果:针对步行(80%-98%)、运动功能受损(64%-100%)和预防跌倒(73%-92%)的特定任务训练实施率最高。促进实施的因素包括:遵守 NGS 至关重要、康复治疗师有信心实施干预措施、干预措施描述清楚。时间有限、缺乏资源、工作场所没有明确的目标或常规则阻碍了干预措施的实施。差异显著(P虽然护理链的各个环节存在差异,但根据 NGS,大多数优先干预措施都是由从事卒中康复的理疗师提供的。知识、时间、教育和支持性管理是实施循证干预的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
102
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine is an international peer-review journal published in English, with at least 10 issues published per year. Original articles, reviews, case reports, short communications, special reports and letters to the editor are published, as also are editorials and book reviews. The journal strives to provide its readers with a variety of topics, including: functional assessment and intervention studies, clinical studies in various patient groups, methodology in physical and rehabilitation medicine, epidemiological studies on disabling conditions and reports on vocational and sociomedical aspects of rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信