Longitudinal Associations Between Pain, Risk for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms, and Pain Characteristics in Children After Unintentional Injury.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anna Monica Agoston, John Bleacher, Alexis Smith, Susanne Edwards, Maia Routly
{"title":"Longitudinal Associations Between Pain, Risk for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms, and Pain Characteristics in Children After Unintentional Injury.","authors":"Anna Monica Agoston, John Bleacher, Alexis Smith, Susanne Edwards, Maia Routly","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Approximately 20% of children demonstrate persistent posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) after unintentional injury, with more severe pain intensity predicting concurrent and later PTSS. Examining additional pain characteristics like pain behaviors, impairment related to pain, and subjective experiences of pain might provide additional insight into the mechanisms that reinforce relationships between risk for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), PTSS, and pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>During hospitalization for unintentional injury, the Screening Tool for Predictors of PTSD (STEPP) was administered and the highest pain score was collected. One month later, the Child PTSD Symptom Scale and PROMIS questionnaires assessed PTSS and pain characteristics respectively, including intensity, interference, behaviors, and quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Correlations between PTSS and PROMIS questionnaires were significant. STEPP predicted future PTSS and all PROMIS questionnaires. The highest pain score predicted future PTSS, as well as pain interference and pain behavior, and did not predict pain intensity and pain quality. When STEPP and highest pain score were combined into a single regression, STEPP and highest pain score predicted future PTSS but only STEPP continued to predict all PROMIS questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>PTSD risk significantly predicted PTSS and pain characteristics 1 month later. The highest pain score predicted future PTSS and several pain characteristics but no longer had predictive value for pain-related outcomes when combined with PTSD risk. These results indicate that risk factors for PTSD are stronger predictors than pain-related risk factors in predicting pain outcomes. Addressing PTSD risk, as well as pain intensity during hospitalization, may result in improved outcomes for children with unintentional injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"400-408"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001212","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Approximately 20% of children demonstrate persistent posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) after unintentional injury, with more severe pain intensity predicting concurrent and later PTSS. Examining additional pain characteristics like pain behaviors, impairment related to pain, and subjective experiences of pain might provide additional insight into the mechanisms that reinforce relationships between risk for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), PTSS, and pain.

Methods: During hospitalization for unintentional injury, the Screening Tool for Predictors of PTSD (STEPP) was administered and the highest pain score was collected. One month later, the Child PTSD Symptom Scale and PROMIS questionnaires assessed PTSS and pain characteristics respectively, including intensity, interference, behaviors, and quality.

Results: Correlations between PTSS and PROMIS questionnaires were significant. STEPP predicted future PTSS and all PROMIS questionnaires. The highest pain score predicted future PTSS, as well as pain interference and pain behavior, and did not predict pain intensity and pain quality. When STEPP and highest pain score were combined into a single regression, STEPP and highest pain score predicted future PTSS but only STEPP continued to predict all PROMIS questionnaires.

Discussion: PTSD risk significantly predicted PTSS and pain characteristics 1 month later. The highest pain score predicted future PTSS and several pain characteristics but no longer had predictive value for pain-related outcomes when combined with PTSD risk. These results indicate that risk factors for PTSD are stronger predictors than pain-related risk factors in predicting pain outcomes. Addressing PTSD risk, as well as pain intensity during hospitalization, may result in improved outcomes for children with unintentional injury.

意外伤害后儿童的疼痛、创伤后应激障碍风险、创伤后应激症状和疼痛特征之间的纵向关联。
目的:约有 20% 的儿童在遭受意外伤害后会表现出持续的创伤后应激障碍(PTSS),更严重的疼痛强度可预示同时和日后的创伤后应激障碍。研究其他疼痛特征,如疼痛行为、与疼痛相关的损伤和疼痛的主观体验,可能会对创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)、PTSS 和疼痛之间的风险强化机制有更多的了解:方法:在意外伤害住院期间,进行创伤后应激障碍预测筛选工具(STEPP)测试,并收集最高疼痛评分。一个月后,儿童创伤后应激障碍症状量表和PROMIS问卷分别评估了创伤后应激障碍和疼痛的特征,包括强度、干扰、行为和质量:结果:创伤后应激障碍症状量表和 PROMIS 问卷之间存在显著相关性。STEPP 预测了未来的 PTSS 和所有 PROMIS 问卷。最高疼痛评分可预测未来的 PTSS 以及疼痛干扰和疼痛行为,但不能预测疼痛强度和疼痛质量。当将 STEPP 和最高疼痛评分合并为一个回归时,STEPP 和最高疼痛评分可预测未来的创伤后应激障碍,但只有 STEPP 仍可预测所有 PROMIS 问卷:讨论:创伤后应激障碍风险可预测一个月后的创伤后应激障碍和疼痛特征。最高疼痛评分可预测未来的创伤后应激障碍和几种疼痛特征,但如果与创伤后应激障碍风险相结合,则不再具有预测疼痛相关结果的价值。这些结果表明,在预测疼痛结果方面,创伤后应激障碍风险因素比疼痛相关风险因素的预测作用更强。应对创伤后应激障碍风险以及住院期间的疼痛强度可能会改善意外伤害儿童的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Journal of Pain
Clinical Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
118
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​The Clinical Journal of Pain explores all aspects of pain and its effective treatment, bringing readers the insights of leading anesthesiologists, surgeons, internists, neurologists, orthopedists, psychiatrists and psychologists, clinical pharmacologists, and rehabilitation medicine specialists. This peer-reviewed journal presents timely and thought-provoking articles on clinical dilemmas in pain management; valuable diagnostic procedures; promising new pharmacological, surgical, and other therapeutic modalities; psychosocial dimensions of pain; and ethical issues of concern to all medical professionals. The journal also publishes Special Topic issues on subjects of particular relevance to the practice of pain medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信