When deep learning is not enough: artificial life as a supplementary tool for segmentation of ultrasound images of breast cancer.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Nalan Karunanayake, Stanislav S Makhanov
{"title":"When deep learning is not enough: artificial life as a supplementary tool for segmentation of ultrasound images of breast cancer.","authors":"Nalan Karunanayake, Stanislav S Makhanov","doi":"10.1007/s11517-024-03026-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Segmentation of tumors in ultrasound (US) images of the breast is a critical issue in medical imaging. Due to the poor quality of US images and the varying specifications of US machines, segmentation and classification of abnormalities present difficulties even for trained radiologists. The paper aims to introduce a novel AI-based hybrid model for US segmentation that offers high accuracy, requires relatively smaller datasets, and is capable of handling previously unseen data. The software can be used for diagnostics and the US-guided biopsies. A unique and robust hybrid approach that combines deep learning (DL) and multi-agent artificial life (AL) has been introduced. The algorithms are verified on three US datasets. The method outperforms 14 selected state-of-the-art algorithms applied to US images characterized by complex geometry and high level of noise. The paper offers an original classification of the images and tests to analyze the limits of the DL. The model has been trained and verified on 1264 ultrasound images. The images are in the JPEG and PNG formats. The age of the patients ranges from 22 to 73 years. The 14 benchmark algorithms include deformable shapes, edge linking, superpixels, machine learning, and DL methods. The tests use eight-region shape- and contour-based evaluation metrics. The proposed method (DL-AL) produces excellent results in terms of the dice coefficient (region) and the relative Hausdorff distance H<sub>3</sub> (contour-based) as follows: the easiest image complexity level, Dice = 0.96 and H<sub>3</sub> = 0.26; the medium complexity level, Dice = 0.91 and H<sub>3</sub> = 0.82; and the hardest complexity level, Dice = 0.90 and H<sub>3</sub> = 0.84. All other metrics follow the same pattern. The DL-AL outperforms the second best (Unet-based) method by 10-20%. The method has been also tested by a series of unconventional tests. The model was trained on low complexity images and applied to the entire set of images. These results are summarized below. (1) Only the low complexity images have been used for training (68% unknown images): Dice = 0.80 and H<sub>3</sub> = 2.01. (2) The low and the medium complexity images have been used for training (51% unknown images): Dice = 0.86 and H<sub>3</sub> = 1.32. (3) The low, medium, and hard complexity images have been used for training (35% unknown images): Dice = 0.92 and H<sub>3</sub> = 0.76. These tests show a significant advantage of DL-AL over 30%. A video demo illustrating the algorithm is at http://tinyurl.com/mr4ah687 .</p>","PeriodicalId":49840,"journal":{"name":"Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing","volume":" ","pages":"2497-2520"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-024-03026-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Segmentation of tumors in ultrasound (US) images of the breast is a critical issue in medical imaging. Due to the poor quality of US images and the varying specifications of US machines, segmentation and classification of abnormalities present difficulties even for trained radiologists. The paper aims to introduce a novel AI-based hybrid model for US segmentation that offers high accuracy, requires relatively smaller datasets, and is capable of handling previously unseen data. The software can be used for diagnostics and the US-guided biopsies. A unique and robust hybrid approach that combines deep learning (DL) and multi-agent artificial life (AL) has been introduced. The algorithms are verified on three US datasets. The method outperforms 14 selected state-of-the-art algorithms applied to US images characterized by complex geometry and high level of noise. The paper offers an original classification of the images and tests to analyze the limits of the DL. The model has been trained and verified on 1264 ultrasound images. The images are in the JPEG and PNG formats. The age of the patients ranges from 22 to 73 years. The 14 benchmark algorithms include deformable shapes, edge linking, superpixels, machine learning, and DL methods. The tests use eight-region shape- and contour-based evaluation metrics. The proposed method (DL-AL) produces excellent results in terms of the dice coefficient (region) and the relative Hausdorff distance H3 (contour-based) as follows: the easiest image complexity level, Dice = 0.96 and H3 = 0.26; the medium complexity level, Dice = 0.91 and H3 = 0.82; and the hardest complexity level, Dice = 0.90 and H3 = 0.84. All other metrics follow the same pattern. The DL-AL outperforms the second best (Unet-based) method by 10-20%. The method has been also tested by a series of unconventional tests. The model was trained on low complexity images and applied to the entire set of images. These results are summarized below. (1) Only the low complexity images have been used for training (68% unknown images): Dice = 0.80 and H3 = 2.01. (2) The low and the medium complexity images have been used for training (51% unknown images): Dice = 0.86 and H3 = 1.32. (3) The low, medium, and hard complexity images have been used for training (35% unknown images): Dice = 0.92 and H3 = 0.76. These tests show a significant advantage of DL-AL over 30%. A video demo illustrating the algorithm is at http://tinyurl.com/mr4ah687 .

Abstract Image

当深度学习还不够时:人工生命作为乳腺癌超声波图像分割的辅助工具。
乳腺超声(US)图像中肿瘤的分割是医学成像中的一个关键问题。由于 US 图像质量较差,且 US 机器的规格各不相同,即使是训练有素的放射科医生也很难对异常情况进行分割和分类。本文旨在介绍一种新颖的基于人工智能的 US 分割混合模型,该模型具有较高的准确性,所需的数据集相对较小,并且能够处理以前未见过的数据。该软件可用于诊断和 US 引导的活组织检查。该软件采用了一种独特而稳健的混合方法,结合了深度学习(DL)和多代理人工生命(AL)。算法在三个 US 数据集上得到了验证。该方法优于 14 种应用于具有复杂几何形状和高噪声水平的 US 图像的最先进算法。论文对图像进行了原创性分类,并通过测试分析了 DL 的局限性。该模型已在 1264 幅超声图像上进行了训练和验证。图像为 JPEG 和 PNG 格式。患者年龄从 22 岁到 73 岁不等。14 种基准算法包括可变形形状、边缘连接、超像素、机器学习和 DL 方法。测试使用基于形状和轮廓的八区域评价指标。所提出的方法(DL-AL)在骰子系数(区域)和相对豪斯多夫距离 H3(基于轮廓)方面取得了以下优异成绩:最简单的图像复杂度级别,骰子 = 0.96,H3 = 0.26;中等复杂度级别,骰子 = 0.91,H3 = 0.82;最困难的复杂度级别,骰子 = 0.90,H3 = 0.84。所有其他指标都遵循相同的模式。DL-AL 比第二好的方法(基于 Unet 的方法)高出 10-20%。该方法还通过了一系列非常规测试。该模型在低复杂度图像上进行了训练,并应用于整个图像集。这些结果总结如下。(1) 只有低复杂度图像被用于训练(68% 的未知图像):Dice = 0.80,H3 = 2.01。 (2) 低复杂度和中等复杂度图像被用于训练(51% 的未知图像):Dice = 0.86,H3 = 1.32。(3) 使用低、中、高复杂度图像进行训练(未知图像占 35%):Dice = 0.92,H3 = 0.76。这些测试表明,DL-AL 的优势明显超过 30%。说明该算法的视频演示见 http://tinyurl.com/mr4ah687 。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
249
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1963, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing (MBEC) continues to serve the biomedical engineering community, covering the entire spectrum of biomedical and clinical engineering. The journal presents exciting and vital experimental and theoretical developments in biomedical science and technology, and reports on advances in computer-based methodologies in these multidisciplinary subjects. The journal also incorporates new and evolving technologies including cellular engineering and molecular imaging. MBEC publishes original research articles as well as reviews and technical notes. Its Rapid Communications category focuses on material of immediate value to the readership, while the Controversies section provides a forum to exchange views on selected issues, stimulating a vigorous and informed debate in this exciting and high profile field. MBEC is an official journal of the International Federation of Medical and Biological Engineering (IFMBE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信