Molecular Point-of-Care Testing in the Emergency Department for Group A Streptococcus Pharyngitis : A Randomized Trial.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Pediatric emergency care Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-18 DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000003154
Carson Gill, Clement Chui, David M Goldfarb, Garth Meckler, Quynh Doan
{"title":"Molecular Point-of-Care Testing in the Emergency Department for Group A Streptococcus Pharyngitis : A Randomized Trial.","authors":"Carson Gill, Clement Chui, David M Goldfarb, Garth Meckler, Quynh Doan","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare clinical and health systems outcomes of rapid molecular testing versus throat culture recovery for the management of group A Streptococcus (GAS) pharyngitis in a pediatric emergency department (PED).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center randomized trial of children (3-17 years) presenting to a PED with suspected GAS pharyngitis. A single dual-headed throat swab was collected, and participants were randomized to 1 of 2 parallel treatment groups with 1:1 allocation: point-of-care (POC) nucleic acid amplification testing or standard throat culture. The primary outcomes were time to throat pain +/- fever resolution. Secondary outcomes included absenteeism, length of stay, return visits to care, and antibiotic prescriptions and utilization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 227 children were randomly assigned to culture (n = 115) or POC (n = 112) testing. Antibiotics were initiated earlier in the POC group by approximately 1 day (95% confidence interval, -0.40 to -1.58). No associated difference in time to throat pain or fever resolution was observed between groups. There was a decrease in the proportion of prescribed antibiotics in the POC group (0.35) compared with the culture group (0.79; P < 0.001). Otherwise, no significant differences in secondary outcomes were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Establishing a POC nucleic acid amplification testing program for GAS in a PED facilitates earlier treatment and fewer antibiotic prescriptions. Although this did not translate to improved clinical and health systems outcomes in our study, it may serve as an important tool amid evolving pediatric febrile illnesses and growing antimicrobial resistance patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":" ","pages":"632-637"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003154","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare clinical and health systems outcomes of rapid molecular testing versus throat culture recovery for the management of group A Streptococcus (GAS) pharyngitis in a pediatric emergency department (PED).

Methods: We conducted a single-center randomized trial of children (3-17 years) presenting to a PED with suspected GAS pharyngitis. A single dual-headed throat swab was collected, and participants were randomized to 1 of 2 parallel treatment groups with 1:1 allocation: point-of-care (POC) nucleic acid amplification testing or standard throat culture. The primary outcomes were time to throat pain +/- fever resolution. Secondary outcomes included absenteeism, length of stay, return visits to care, and antibiotic prescriptions and utilization.

Results: A total of 227 children were randomly assigned to culture (n = 115) or POC (n = 112) testing. Antibiotics were initiated earlier in the POC group by approximately 1 day (95% confidence interval, -0.40 to -1.58). No associated difference in time to throat pain or fever resolution was observed between groups. There was a decrease in the proportion of prescribed antibiotics in the POC group (0.35) compared with the culture group (0.79; P < 0.001). Otherwise, no significant differences in secondary outcomes were observed.

Conclusions: Establishing a POC nucleic acid amplification testing program for GAS in a PED facilitates earlier treatment and fewer antibiotic prescriptions. Although this did not translate to improved clinical and health systems outcomes in our study, it may serve as an important tool amid evolving pediatric febrile illnesses and growing antimicrobial resistance patterns.

急诊科 A 群链球菌咽炎分子护理点检测:随机试验。
目的:比较在儿科急诊室(PED)治疗 A 组链球菌咽炎时,快速分子检测与咽喉培养恢复的临床和医疗系统效果:在儿科急诊室(PED)处理 A 组链球菌(GAS)咽炎时,比较快速分子检测与咽培养恢复的临床和卫生系统效果:我们对疑似患有 A 组链球菌咽炎的儿童(3-17 岁)进行了单中心随机试验。我们采集了一个双头咽拭子,并将参与者随机分配到两个平行治疗组中的一个,两组的分配比例为1:1:护理点(POC)核酸扩增检测组或标准咽培养组。主要结果是喉咙疼痛+/-发烧缓解的时间。次要结果包括缺勤率、住院时间、回访率、抗生素处方和使用率:共有 227 名儿童被随机分配接受培养(115 人)或 POC(112 人)检测。POC组的抗生素使用时间提前了约1天(95%置信区间为-0.40至-1.58)。两组患者咽喉疼痛或退烧的时间没有相关差异。与培养组(0.79;P <0.001)相比,POC 组的抗生素处方比例(0.35)有所下降。其他次要结果无明显差异:结论:在 PED 中建立针对 GAS 的 POC 核酸扩增检测项目有助于尽早治疗和减少抗生素处方。尽管在我们的研究中,这并没有转化为临床和卫生系统结果的改善,但在儿科发热疾病不断发展和抗菌药耐药性不断增加的情况下,这可能会成为一种重要的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信