The Barriers to Recognizing and Reporting Child Physical Abuse by Emergency Physicians and Associated Factors.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Pediatric emergency care Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-18 DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000003146
Dongwoo Lee, Jin Hee Lee, Young Ho Kwak, Dongbum Suh, Hyuksool Kwon, Do Kyun Kim, Jin Hee Jung, Joong Wan Park, Ha Ni Lee, Jin Hee Kim
{"title":"The Barriers to Recognizing and Reporting Child Physical Abuse by Emergency Physicians and Associated Factors.","authors":"Dongwoo Lee, Jin Hee Lee, Young Ho Kwak, Dongbum Suh, Hyuksool Kwon, Do Kyun Kim, Jin Hee Jung, Joong Wan Park, Ha Ni Lee, Jin Hee Kim","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the reporting rate of child abuse is increasing every year, the child abuse detection rate is 3.81% as of 2019 in Korea, which is significantly lower than that of developed countries for child rights.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We investigated the associated factors with barriers that emergency physicians face in recognizing and reporting cases of child abuse.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From May to July 2022, 240 emergency physicians working in the 15 emergency department were asked to participate in the survey via email. The questionnaire included the respondent's basic information, treatment experience for child abuse, reasons for reporting or not reporting, and opinions on measures to increase the reporting rate. We conducted a logistic regression analysis to discern the factors contributing to underreporting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-one individuals were included in the analysis, after excluding those who had never encountered suspected cases of child abuse. A multivariable logistic regression was performed with the above variables, and although it was not statistically significant, there was a tendency for workers to report well when working at a pediatric emergency department (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 3.97 [0.98-16.09]). The primary reason for reporting suspected abuse was the pattern of damage suspected of abuse. The first reason for not reporting suspected abuse was because they were not sure it was child abuse. Respondents answered that to report better, a quick and appropriate response from the police and confidentiality of the reporter were needed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Physicians in pediatric emergency departments demonstrated a tendency for more proactive reporting suspected cases of child abuse.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003146","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although the reporting rate of child abuse is increasing every year, the child abuse detection rate is 3.81% as of 2019 in Korea, which is significantly lower than that of developed countries for child rights.

Objective: We investigated the associated factors with barriers that emergency physicians face in recognizing and reporting cases of child abuse.

Methods: From May to July 2022, 240 emergency physicians working in the 15 emergency department were asked to participate in the survey via email. The questionnaire included the respondent's basic information, treatment experience for child abuse, reasons for reporting or not reporting, and opinions on measures to increase the reporting rate. We conducted a logistic regression analysis to discern the factors contributing to underreporting.

Results: Seventy-one individuals were included in the analysis, after excluding those who had never encountered suspected cases of child abuse. A multivariable logistic regression was performed with the above variables, and although it was not statistically significant, there was a tendency for workers to report well when working at a pediatric emergency department (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 3.97 [0.98-16.09]). The primary reason for reporting suspected abuse was the pattern of damage suspected of abuse. The first reason for not reporting suspected abuse was because they were not sure it was child abuse. Respondents answered that to report better, a quick and appropriate response from the police and confidentiality of the reporter were needed.

Conclusions: Physicians in pediatric emergency departments demonstrated a tendency for more proactive reporting suspected cases of child abuse.

急诊医生识别和报告儿童身体虐待的障碍及相关因素。
背景:虽然虐童事件的报告率逐年上升,但截至2019年,韩国的虐童事件发现率为3.81%,明显低于儿童权利发达国家:我们调查了急诊医生在识别和报告虐童病例时面临障碍的相关因素:2022 年 5 月至 7 月,240 名在 15 个急诊科工作的急诊医生通过电子邮件参与了调查。问卷内容包括受访者的基本信息、虐待儿童的治疗经验、报告或不报告的原因以及对提高报告率措施的看法。我们进行了逻辑回归分析,以找出导致报告不足的因素:在排除从未遇到过疑似虐待儿童案件的人员后,有 71 人被纳入分析。根据上述变量进行了多变量逻辑回归,尽管在统计上并不显著,但在儿科急诊室工作的工作人员倾向于积极报告(几率比[95% 置信区间],3.97 [0.98-16.09])。报告疑似虐待的主要原因是疑似虐待的损害模式。不报告疑似虐待的第一个原因是他们不确定是否是虐待儿童。受访者回答说,要想更好地报告,需要警方做出快速、适当的反应,并为报告者保密:儿科急诊室的医生倾向于更积极主动地报告疑似虐童案件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信