Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes Associated With Phenobarbital With Taper Compared to No Taper for the Management of Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-19 DOI:10.1177/10600280241236412
Matthew Thaller, Adrian Wong, Tuyen Yankama, Ifeoma Mary Eche, Pansy Elsamadisi
{"title":"Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes Associated With Phenobarbital With Taper Compared to No Taper for the Management of Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome.","authors":"Matthew Thaller, Adrian Wong, Tuyen Yankama, Ifeoma Mary Eche, Pansy Elsamadisi","doi":"10.1177/10600280241236412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Phenobarbital (PHB) has been shown to be an effective treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS), with multiple dosing strategies used (e.g., single-dose and symptom-triggered). Studies have often used tapered doses, typically following a front-loaded dose, despite PHB's long half-life which should lead to an ability to auto-taper.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes associated with two PHB dosing strategies (taper [T], no taper [NT]) for AWS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study compared adult patients admitted to the ICU from October 2017 to May 2019 who received an initial loading dose of PHB for AWS. The use of PHB was at the discretion of the clinician per our institutional guidelines. Prior to November 2018, patients were prescribed a PHB taper, while after this period, the taper was no longer recommended. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients requiring rescue PHB or adjunctive medications for AWS. Secondary outcomes included number of adjunctive agents used, prevalence of severe manifestations of AWS, ICU and hospital lengths of stay, and incidence of potentially significant drug interactions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 172 patients were included (T: n = 81, NT: n = 91). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, including history of severe AWS and cumulative benzodiazepine dose pre-PHB. There was no difference in the primary outcome between groups (T: 70.4% vs NT: 59.3%, <i>P</i> = 0.152). The median number of adjunctive agents per patient, severe manifestations, and ICU and hospital length of stay did not differ between groups. Twenty-five patients (14.5%) had potentially significant drug interactions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>The use of a PHB loading dose without a taper may be comparable to a taper strategy on clinical outcomes. Prospective studies are needed to further delineate the optimal dose of PHB for AWS.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10600280241236412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Phenobarbital (PHB) has been shown to be an effective treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS), with multiple dosing strategies used (e.g., single-dose and symptom-triggered). Studies have often used tapered doses, typically following a front-loaded dose, despite PHB's long half-life which should lead to an ability to auto-taper.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes associated with two PHB dosing strategies (taper [T], no taper [NT]) for AWS.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study compared adult patients admitted to the ICU from October 2017 to May 2019 who received an initial loading dose of PHB for AWS. The use of PHB was at the discretion of the clinician per our institutional guidelines. Prior to November 2018, patients were prescribed a PHB taper, while after this period, the taper was no longer recommended. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients requiring rescue PHB or adjunctive medications for AWS. Secondary outcomes included number of adjunctive agents used, prevalence of severe manifestations of AWS, ICU and hospital lengths of stay, and incidence of potentially significant drug interactions.

Results: A total of 172 patients were included (T: n = 81, NT: n = 91). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, including history of severe AWS and cumulative benzodiazepine dose pre-PHB. There was no difference in the primary outcome between groups (T: 70.4% vs NT: 59.3%, P = 0.152). The median number of adjunctive agents per patient, severe manifestations, and ICU and hospital length of stay did not differ between groups. Twenty-five patients (14.5%) had potentially significant drug interactions.

Conclusion and relevance: The use of a PHB loading dose without a taper may be comparable to a taper strategy on clinical outcomes. Prospective studies are needed to further delineate the optimal dose of PHB for AWS.

评估苯巴比妥减量与不减量治疗酒精戒断综合征的临床效果。
背景:苯巴比妥(PHB)已被证明是治疗酒精戒断综合征(AWS)的有效药物,并采用了多种剂量策略(如单剂量和症状触发剂量)。尽管PHB的半衰期较长,可以自动减量,但研究通常采用渐减剂量的方式,通常是在前负荷剂量之后使用:本研究旨在比较两种 PHB 给药策略(减量 [T]、不减量 [NT])对 AWS 的临床疗效:这项回顾性队列研究比较了 2017 年 10 月至 2019 年 5 月入住重症监护病房、接受初始负荷剂量 PHB 治疗 AWS 的成人患者。根据我们的机构指南,PHB 的使用由临床医生决定。在 2018 年 11 月之前,患者会被开具 PHB 减量处方,而在此期间之后,则不再推荐使用 PHB 减量处方。主要结果是需要抢救性 PHB 或辅助药物治疗 AWS 的患者比例。次要结果包括所用辅助药物的数量、AWS 严重表现的发生率、重症监护室和住院时间以及潜在重大药物相互作用的发生率:共纳入172名患者(T组:81人;NT组:91人)。两组患者的基线特征相似,包括严重AWS病史和PHB前苯二氮卓类药物的累积剂量。两组的主要结果无差异(T:70.4% vs NT:59.3%,P = 0.152)。每名患者使用辅助药物的中位数、严重表现、重症监护室和住院时间在组间无差异。25名患者(14.5%)有潜在的重大药物相互作用:在临床结果上,使用 PHB 负荷剂量而不减量的效果可能与减量策略相当。需要进行前瞻性研究,以进一步确定 PHB 用于 AWS 的最佳剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信