Mitochondrial DNA Sequencing and BLAST Analysis Reveal Visual Misidentification of Nonhuman Primates Suspected to have Died of Yellow Fever in Brazil in 2017–2020

IF 1.9 3区 生物学 Q1 ZOOLOGY
Bruna Elenara Szynwelski, Marcelo Merten Cruz, Maria Angélica Monteiro de Mello Mares-Guia, Ana Maria Bispo de Filippis, Thales Renato Ochotorena de Freitas
{"title":"Mitochondrial DNA Sequencing and BLAST Analysis Reveal Visual Misidentification of Nonhuman Primates Suspected to have Died of Yellow Fever in Brazil in 2017–2020","authors":"Bruna Elenara Szynwelski, Marcelo Merten Cruz, Maria Angélica Monteiro de Mello Mares-Guia, Ana Maria Bispo de Filippis, Thales Renato Ochotorena de Freitas","doi":"10.1007/s10764-024-00426-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Epidemics have significant impacts on primate populations. In 2016, yellow fever spread rapidly to the most densely populated states of Brazil, resulting in the death of hundreds of humans and thousands of nonhuman primates. The Yellow Fever Surveillance Program (Programa de Vigilância da Febre Amarela) implemented by the Brazilian government was designed to prevent and control yellow fever outbreaks. In 2020, the regional reference laboratory at the Oswaldo Cruz Institute in Rio de Janeiro state in Brazil, responsible for yellow fever diagnosis, gave us access to 24 DNA samples from capuchin monkeys, which had tested negative for yellow fever virus. The samples were all from sites in Brazil where <i>Sapajus nigritus</i> is the only species of capuchin monkey present. We attempted to sequence two mitochondrial molecular markers commonly used for Cebidae, but five samples did not amplify. In this study, we performed additional DNA amplification and the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) to confirm the species identity of the 19 samples, which amplified and identify the taxon of the five samples that had failed to amplify. Among the 19 samples correctly identified as <i>Sapajus</i>, one was not <i>Sapajus nigritus</i> but another <i>Sapajus</i> species. Of the five samples that previously failed to amplify, three were similar to <i>Callicebus nigrifrons</i>, one was similar to <i>Alouatta guariba clamitans</i>, and one failed to amplify successfully for any marker. These findings show an error rate of 5/24 (21%) in the original taxonomic identification. Misidentification occurred at the genus level as well as the species level. Our findings highlight the importance of precise taxonomic classification in obtaining reliable data on the consequences of the yellow fever epidemic for primates.</p>","PeriodicalId":14264,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Primatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Primatology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-024-00426-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Epidemics have significant impacts on primate populations. In 2016, yellow fever spread rapidly to the most densely populated states of Brazil, resulting in the death of hundreds of humans and thousands of nonhuman primates. The Yellow Fever Surveillance Program (Programa de Vigilância da Febre Amarela) implemented by the Brazilian government was designed to prevent and control yellow fever outbreaks. In 2020, the regional reference laboratory at the Oswaldo Cruz Institute in Rio de Janeiro state in Brazil, responsible for yellow fever diagnosis, gave us access to 24 DNA samples from capuchin monkeys, which had tested negative for yellow fever virus. The samples were all from sites in Brazil where Sapajus nigritus is the only species of capuchin monkey present. We attempted to sequence two mitochondrial molecular markers commonly used for Cebidae, but five samples did not amplify. In this study, we performed additional DNA amplification and the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) to confirm the species identity of the 19 samples, which amplified and identify the taxon of the five samples that had failed to amplify. Among the 19 samples correctly identified as Sapajus, one was not Sapajus nigritus but another Sapajus species. Of the five samples that previously failed to amplify, three were similar to Callicebus nigrifrons, one was similar to Alouatta guariba clamitans, and one failed to amplify successfully for any marker. These findings show an error rate of 5/24 (21%) in the original taxonomic identification. Misidentification occurred at the genus level as well as the species level. Our findings highlight the importance of precise taxonomic classification in obtaining reliable data on the consequences of the yellow fever epidemic for primates.

Abstract Image

线粒体 DNA 测序和 BLAST 分析揭示 2017-2020 年巴西疑似死于黄热病的非人灵长类动物的视觉识别错误
流行病对灵长类动物种群具有重大影响。2016 年,黄热病迅速蔓延到巴西人口最稠密的各州,造成数百人和数千非人灵长类动物死亡。巴西政府实施的黄热病监测计划(Programa de Vigilância da Febre Amarela)旨在预防和控制黄热病疫情。2020 年,巴西里约热内卢州奥斯瓦尔多-克鲁斯研究所(Oswaldo Cruz Institute)负责黄热病诊断的地区参考实验室向我们提供了 24 份卷尾猴的 DNA 样本,这些样本的黄热病病毒检测呈阴性。这些样本都来自巴西的一些地方,那里的卷尾猴是唯一存在的卷尾猴物种。我们尝试对僧帽猴常用的两个线粒体分子标记进行测序,但有五个样本没有扩增。在本研究中,我们进行了额外的DNA扩增,并使用基本局部比对搜索工具(BLAST)确认了扩增成功的19个样本的物种身份,并确定了扩增失败的5个样本的类群。在被正确鉴定为无患子的 19 个样本中,有一个不是黑无患子,而是另一个无患子物种。在之前扩增失败的 5 个样本中,有 3 个与 Callicebus nigrifrons 相似,1 个与 Alouatta guariba clamitans 相似,1 个未能成功扩增任何标记。这些结果表明,原始分类鉴定的错误率为 5/24(21%)。错误鉴定既发生在属一级,也发生在种一级。我们的研究结果凸显了精确分类的重要性,有助于获得有关黄热病疫情对灵长类动物影响的可靠数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
16.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Primatology is a multidisciplinary forum devoted to the dissemination of current research in fundamental primatology. Publishing peer-reviewed, high-quality original articles which feature primates, the journal gathers laboratory and field studies from such diverse disciplines as anthropology, anatomy, ecology, ethology, paleontology, psychology, sociology, and zoology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信