Does Intermittent Nutrition Enterally Normalise hormonal and metabolic responses to feeding in critically ill adults? A protocol for the DINE-Normal proof-of-concept randomised parallel group study.

Clodagh E Beattie, Matt Thomas, Borislava Borislavova, Harry A Smith, Michael Ambler, Paul White, Kati Hayes, Danielle Milne, Aravind V Ramesh, Javier T Gonzalez, James A Betts, Anthony E Pickering
{"title":"Does Intermittent Nutrition Enterally Normalise hormonal and metabolic responses to feeding in critically ill adults? A protocol for the DINE-Normal proof-of-concept randomised parallel group study.","authors":"Clodagh E Beattie, Matt Thomas, Borislava Borislavova, Harry A Smith, Michael Ambler, Paul White, Kati Hayes, Danielle Milne, Aravind V Ramesh, Javier T Gonzalez, James A Betts, Anthony E Pickering","doi":"10.1101/2024.03.14.24303591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction:\nOver half of patients who spend >48 hours in the intensive care unit (ICU) are fed via a nasogastric (NG) tube. Current guidance recommends continuous delivery of feed throughout the day and night. Emerging evidence from healthy human studies shows that NG feeding in an intermittent pattern (rather than continuous) promotes phasic hormonal, digestive and metabolic responses that are important for effective nutrition. It is not yet known whether this will translate to the critically ill population. Here we present the protocol for a proof-of-concept study comparing diurnal intermittent versus continuous feeding for patients in the intensive care unit. Methods and Analysis:\nThe study is a single-centre, prospective, randomised, open-label trial comparing intermittent enteral nutrition with the current standard practice of continuous enteral feeding. It aims to recruit participants (n=30) needing enteral nutrition via an NG tube for >24 hours who will be randomised to a diurnal intermittent or a continuous feeding regime with equivalent nutritional value. The primary outcome is peak plasma insulin / c-peptide within 3 hours of delivering the morning bolus feed on the second study day, compared to that seen in the continuous feed delivery group at the same timepoint. Secondary outcomes include feasibility, tolerability, efficacy and metabolic / hormonal profiles. Ethics and Dissemination:\nThis trial has been registered prospectively with the Clinical Trials Registry (clinicaltrials.gov - NCT06115044). We obtained ethical approval from the Wales Research Ethics Committee 3 prior to data collection (reference 23/WA/0297). We will publish the results of this study in an open-access peer-reviewed journal.","PeriodicalId":501249,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.14.24303591","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Over half of patients who spend >48 hours in the intensive care unit (ICU) are fed via a nasogastric (NG) tube. Current guidance recommends continuous delivery of feed throughout the day and night. Emerging evidence from healthy human studies shows that NG feeding in an intermittent pattern (rather than continuous) promotes phasic hormonal, digestive and metabolic responses that are important for effective nutrition. It is not yet known whether this will translate to the critically ill population. Here we present the protocol for a proof-of-concept study comparing diurnal intermittent versus continuous feeding for patients in the intensive care unit. Methods and Analysis: The study is a single-centre, prospective, randomised, open-label trial comparing intermittent enteral nutrition with the current standard practice of continuous enteral feeding. It aims to recruit participants (n=30) needing enteral nutrition via an NG tube for >24 hours who will be randomised to a diurnal intermittent or a continuous feeding regime with equivalent nutritional value. The primary outcome is peak plasma insulin / c-peptide within 3 hours of delivering the morning bolus feed on the second study day, compared to that seen in the continuous feed delivery group at the same timepoint. Secondary outcomes include feasibility, tolerability, efficacy and metabolic / hormonal profiles. Ethics and Dissemination: This trial has been registered prospectively with the Clinical Trials Registry (clinicaltrials.gov - NCT06115044). We obtained ethical approval from the Wales Research Ethics Committee 3 prior to data collection (reference 23/WA/0297). We will publish the results of this study in an open-access peer-reviewed journal.
间歇性肠内营养是否能使重症成人的荷尔蒙和新陈代谢对进食的反应正常化?DINE-Normal概念验证随机平行分组研究方案。
导言:在重症监护室(ICU)中度过 48 小时的患者中,有一半以上是通过鼻胃管喂食的。目前的指南建议全天候持续喂食。来自健康人体研究的新证据显示,间歇性(而非持续性)鼻胃管喂食可促进阶段性激素、消化和新陈代谢反应,这对有效营养非常重要。目前尚不清楚这是否适用于重症患者。在此,我们将介绍一项概念验证研究的方案,比较重症监护病房患者的昼夜间歇喂养与持续喂养。方法与分析:该研究是一项单中心、前瞻性、随机、开放标签试验,比较间歇性肠内营养与当前持续性肠内喂养的标准做法。研究旨在招募需要通过 NG 管进行 24 小时肠内营养的参与者(30 人),他们将被随机分配到营养价值相当的昼夜间歇喂养或持续喂养方案中。主要结果是在第二个研究日早晨给药后 3 小时内血浆胰岛素/c-肽达到峰值,并与连续给药组在同一时间点的血浆胰岛素/c-肽峰值进行比较。次要结果包括可行性、耐受性、疗效和代谢/激素概况。伦理与传播:本试验已在临床试验注册中心(clinicaltrials.gov - NCT06115044)进行了前瞻性注册。在数据收集之前,我们获得了威尔士研究伦理委员会(Wales Research Ethics Committee 3)的伦理批准(参考文献 23/WA/0297)。我们将在公开发行的同行评审期刊上发表这项研究的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信