Non-endoscopic screening for Barrett's esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in at risk Veterans

Katarina B. Greer, Andrew E. Blum, Ashley L. Faulx, Erica M. Deming, Lauren L. Hricik, Hinnah Siddiqui, Brigid M. Wilson, Amitabh Chak
{"title":"Non-endoscopic screening for Barrett's esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in at risk Veterans","authors":"Katarina B. Greer, Andrew E. Blum, Ashley L. Faulx, Erica M. Deming, Lauren L. Hricik, Hinnah Siddiqui, Brigid M. Wilson, Amitabh Chak","doi":"10.1101/2024.03.15.24304354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: While rates of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma (EAC) in the US continue to rise, many patients at risk of disease are not screened. EsoCheck (EC), a non-endoscopic esophageal balloon sampling device coupled with EsoGuard (EG), a DNA based screening assay, is an FDA-approved minimally invasive alternative to the traditional screening method of upper endoscopy. Aim: Aim To prospectively determine the diagnostic accuracy, tolerance, and acceptability of the EC/EG test in a screening population. Methods: We recruited Veterans who met the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) Guideline criteria for endoscopic Barrett's Esophagus (BE) and EAC screening at Louis Stokes Cleveland Veteran Affairs Medical Center. All study participants completed unsedated EC guided distal esophageal sampling followed by a sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). Diagnostic yield of the EG assay and EGD was recorded and used in calculation of sensitivity and specificity of EC/EG in prospective screening. The abbreviated Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-6) questionnaire was administered before and after completion of EC. Overall tolerance of EC sampling was evaluated on a 10-point Likert scale. Results: Results Esophageal cancer screening was accepted by 130/782 (16.6%) eligible veterans and we analyzed results of those who completed both screening tests (N = 124). Prevalence of BE/EAC among studied veterans was 12.9% (16/124), based on EGD. Sensitivity and specificity of EC/EG for EGD-detected BE/EAC were 92.9% (95% CI 66.1, 99.8) and 72.2% (95% CI 62.1, 80.8), respectively. Positive and negative predictive values were 32.5% (95% CI 18.6, 49.1) and 98.6% (95% CI 92.4, 100), respectively. Baseline STAI-6 scores were reflective of notable levels of anxiety among veterans in the peri-procedural setting. Mean post-procedure acceptability score for Esocheck test was 7.23 (SD 2.45). Conclusions: Conclusions Our data suggest excellent sensitivity and negative predictive value of EC/EG in a screening population of veterans, making this modality a powerful screening tool for BE and EAC.","PeriodicalId":501258,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Gastroenterology","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.15.24304354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While rates of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma (EAC) in the US continue to rise, many patients at risk of disease are not screened. EsoCheck (EC), a non-endoscopic esophageal balloon sampling device coupled with EsoGuard (EG), a DNA based screening assay, is an FDA-approved minimally invasive alternative to the traditional screening method of upper endoscopy. Aim: Aim To prospectively determine the diagnostic accuracy, tolerance, and acceptability of the EC/EG test in a screening population. Methods: We recruited Veterans who met the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) Guideline criteria for endoscopic Barrett's Esophagus (BE) and EAC screening at Louis Stokes Cleveland Veteran Affairs Medical Center. All study participants completed unsedated EC guided distal esophageal sampling followed by a sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). Diagnostic yield of the EG assay and EGD was recorded and used in calculation of sensitivity and specificity of EC/EG in prospective screening. The abbreviated Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-6) questionnaire was administered before and after completion of EC. Overall tolerance of EC sampling was evaluated on a 10-point Likert scale. Results: Results Esophageal cancer screening was accepted by 130/782 (16.6%) eligible veterans and we analyzed results of those who completed both screening tests (N = 124). Prevalence of BE/EAC among studied veterans was 12.9% (16/124), based on EGD. Sensitivity and specificity of EC/EG for EGD-detected BE/EAC were 92.9% (95% CI 66.1, 99.8) and 72.2% (95% CI 62.1, 80.8), respectively. Positive and negative predictive values were 32.5% (95% CI 18.6, 49.1) and 98.6% (95% CI 92.4, 100), respectively. Baseline STAI-6 scores were reflective of notable levels of anxiety among veterans in the peri-procedural setting. Mean post-procedure acceptability score for Esocheck test was 7.23 (SD 2.45). Conclusions: Conclusions Our data suggest excellent sensitivity and negative predictive value of EC/EG in a screening population of veterans, making this modality a powerful screening tool for BE and EAC.
对高危退伍军人进行巴雷特食管和食管腺癌的非内窥镜筛查
背景:虽然美国食管腺癌(EAC)的发病率持续上升,但许多有患病风险的患者并未接受筛查。EsoCheck(EC)是一种非内镜食管球囊取样装置,与基于 DNA 的筛查化验 EsoGuard(EG)结合使用,是经美国 FDA 批准的微创检查方法,可替代传统的上内镜筛查方法。目的:旨在前瞻性地确定 EC/EG 检测在筛查人群中的诊断准确性、耐受性和可接受性。方法:我们在路易斯-斯托克斯-克利夫兰退伍军人事务医疗中心招募了符合美国胃肠病学院 (ACG) 内镜巴雷特食管 (BE) 和 EAC 筛查指南标准的退伍军人。所有参加研究的人员都在无镇静剂的情况下完成了 EC 引导下的食管远端取样,然后进行了镇静剂食管胃十二指肠镜检查 (EGD)。记录 EG 检测和 EGD 的诊断率,并用于计算前瞻性筛查中 EC/EG 的敏感性和特异性。在完成食管造影前后均进行了简短的斯皮尔伯格状态-行为焦虑量表(STAI-6)问卷调查。以 10 点李克特量表评估对 EC 抽样的总体耐受性。结果130/782(16.6%)名符合条件的退伍军人接受了食管癌筛查,我们分析了完成两项筛查的退伍军人(N = 124)的结果。根据胃肠道造影检查,所研究的退伍军人中BE/EAC的患病率为12.9%(16/124)。EC/EG对EGD检测出的BE/EAC的敏感性和特异性分别为92.9%(95% CI 66.1,99.8)和72.2%(95% CI 62.1,80.8)。阳性和阴性预测值分别为 32.5% (95% CI 18.6, 49.1) 和 98.6% (95% CI 92.4, 100)。基线 STAI-6 评分反映了退伍军人在手术前的显著焦虑水平。Esocheck测试的术后可接受性平均得分为7.23(标清2.45)。结论我们的数据表明,在退伍军人筛查人群中,EC/EG 具有极高的灵敏度和阴性预测价值,使其成为筛查 BE 和 EAC 的有力工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信