New robotic platform for transoral robotic surgery: an IDEAL stage 0 study

IF 2.1 Q2 SURGERY
Asit Arora, Jack Faulkner, Vinidh Paleri, Karan Kapoor, Ali Al-Lami, Oladejo Olaleye, Stuart Winter, Geogios Oikonomou, Enyi Ofo, Sebastien Ourselin, Prokar Dasgupta, Mark Slack, Jean-Pierre Jeannon
{"title":"New robotic platform for transoral robotic surgery: an IDEAL stage 0 study","authors":"Asit Arora, Jack Faulkner, Vinidh Paleri, Karan Kapoor, Ali Al-Lami, Oladejo Olaleye, Stuart Winter, Geogios Oikonomou, Enyi Ofo, Sebastien Ourselin, Prokar Dasgupta, Mark Slack, Jean-Pierre Jeannon","doi":"10.1136/bmjsit-2022-000181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives This study aims to assess the feasibility to perform transoral robotic surgery (TORS) with a new robotic platform, the Versius Surgical System (CMR Surgical, UK) in a preclinical cadaveric setting in accordance to stage 0 of the IDEAL-D framework. Design IDEAL stage 0 preclinical assessment of the Versius Robotic System in TORS in human cadavers. Setting All procedures were performed in a simulated operating theatre environment at a UK surgical training centre. Participants 11 consultant head and neck surgeons from the UK, mainland Europe and the USA took part in TORS procedures on six human cadavers. Interventions 3 key index procedures were assessed that represent the core surgical workload of TORS: lateral oropharyngectomy, tongue base resection and partial supraglottic laryngectomy. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was the successful completion of each surgical procedure. Secondary outcomes included the optimisation of system setup, instrumentation and surgeon-reported outcomes for feasibility of each component procedural step. Results 33 cadaveric procedures were performed and 32 were successfully completed. One supraglottic laryngectomy was not fully completed due to issues dividing the epiglottic cartilage with available instrumentation. Surgeon-reported outcomes met the minimal level of feasibility in all procedures and a consensus that it is feasible to perform TORS with Versius was reached. Available instrumentation was not representative of other robotic platforms used in TORS and further instrument optimisation is recommended before wider dissemination. Conclusions It is feasible to perform TORS with the Versius Surgical System (CMR Surgical) within a pre-clinical cadaveric setting. Clinical evaluation is needed and appropriate with the system. Further instrument development and optimisation is desirable. Data are available upon reasonable request. All data collected are available on request.","PeriodicalId":33349,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2022-000181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives This study aims to assess the feasibility to perform transoral robotic surgery (TORS) with a new robotic platform, the Versius Surgical System (CMR Surgical, UK) in a preclinical cadaveric setting in accordance to stage 0 of the IDEAL-D framework. Design IDEAL stage 0 preclinical assessment of the Versius Robotic System in TORS in human cadavers. Setting All procedures were performed in a simulated operating theatre environment at a UK surgical training centre. Participants 11 consultant head and neck surgeons from the UK, mainland Europe and the USA took part in TORS procedures on six human cadavers. Interventions 3 key index procedures were assessed that represent the core surgical workload of TORS: lateral oropharyngectomy, tongue base resection and partial supraglottic laryngectomy. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was the successful completion of each surgical procedure. Secondary outcomes included the optimisation of system setup, instrumentation and surgeon-reported outcomes for feasibility of each component procedural step. Results 33 cadaveric procedures were performed and 32 were successfully completed. One supraglottic laryngectomy was not fully completed due to issues dividing the epiglottic cartilage with available instrumentation. Surgeon-reported outcomes met the minimal level of feasibility in all procedures and a consensus that it is feasible to perform TORS with Versius was reached. Available instrumentation was not representative of other robotic platforms used in TORS and further instrument optimisation is recommended before wider dissemination. Conclusions It is feasible to perform TORS with the Versius Surgical System (CMR Surgical) within a pre-clinical cadaveric setting. Clinical evaluation is needed and appropriate with the system. Further instrument development and optimisation is desirable. Data are available upon reasonable request. All data collected are available on request.
用于经口机器人手术的新型机器人平台:IDEAL 0 期研究
目的 本研究旨在根据 IDEAL-D 框架的第 0 阶段,在临床前尸体环境中评估使用新型机器人平台 Versius 手术系统(英国 CMR 外科公司)进行经口机器人手术(TORS)的可行性。设计 IDEAL 第 0 阶段对 Versius 机器人系统在人体尸体上进行 TORS 的临床前评估。环境 所有手术均在英国一家外科培训中心的模拟手术室环境中进行。11 名来自英国、欧洲大陆和美国的头颈外科顾问医生参与了在 6 具人体尸体上进行的 TORS 手术。对代表 TORS 核心手术工作量的 3 个关键指标程序进行了评估:侧口咽切除术、舌根切除术和声门上喉部分切除术。主要结果测量 主要结果是成功完成每个手术过程。次要结果包括优化系统设置、器械和外科医生报告的结果,以了解每个手术步骤的可行性。结果 共进行了 33 例尸体手术,成功完成 32 例。由于使用现有器械分割会厌软骨存在问题,一项声门上喉切除术未能完全完成。外科医生报告的结果符合所有手术的最低可行性水平,并就使用 Versius 进行 TORS 手术的可行性达成了共识。现有器械不能代表用于 TORS 的其他机器人平台,建议在广泛推广前进一步优化器械。结论 在临床前尸体环境中使用 Versius 手术系统(CMR Surgical)进行 TORS 是可行的。需要对该系统进行适当的临床评估。进一步的器械开发和优化是可取的。如有合理要求,可提供数据。可应要求提供收集到的所有数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信