Legitimacy of community-based social enterprises (CBSE) in service provision in rural areas

IF 2.5 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Katja Rinne-Koski, Merja Lähdesmäki
{"title":"Legitimacy of community-based social enterprises (CBSE) in service provision in rural areas","authors":"Katja Rinne-Koski, Merja Lähdesmäki","doi":"10.1108/ijpsm-04-2023-0127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Municipalities seek new opportunities for co-producing services in rural areas. One potential partner is community-based social enterprises (CBSEs). However, whilst service co-production through CBSEs obscures the traditional roles of actors, it may lead to a legitimation crisis in local service provision. In this paper, the ways CBSEs are legitimised as service providers in rural areas are addressed from the CBSE and municipality perspectives.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Empirical data combine interviews with CBSE representatives and open-ended national survey responses from municipality decision-makers. The data analysis is based on a qualitative content analysis to examine legitimation arguments.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Results show that unestablished legitimacy and un-institutionalised support structures for co-production models build mistrust between CBSEs and municipalities, which prevents the parties from seeing the benefits of cooperation in service production.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The research focusses on the legitimation of CBSEs in service co-production in rural areas. As legitimation seems to be a context-specific process, future research is needed regarding other contexts.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>Municipalities interested in the co-production of services might benefit from establishing a collaborative and responsive (rural) service policy forum that would institutionalise new models of co-production and enable better design and governance of service provision.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Results will give new theoretical and practical insights into the importance of legitimacy in the development of service co-production relationships.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47437,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Public Sector Management","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Public Sector Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpsm-04-2023-0127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Municipalities seek new opportunities for co-producing services in rural areas. One potential partner is community-based social enterprises (CBSEs). However, whilst service co-production through CBSEs obscures the traditional roles of actors, it may lead to a legitimation crisis in local service provision. In this paper, the ways CBSEs are legitimised as service providers in rural areas are addressed from the CBSE and municipality perspectives.

Design/methodology/approach

Empirical data combine interviews with CBSE representatives and open-ended national survey responses from municipality decision-makers. The data analysis is based on a qualitative content analysis to examine legitimation arguments.

Findings

Results show that unestablished legitimacy and un-institutionalised support structures for co-production models build mistrust between CBSEs and municipalities, which prevents the parties from seeing the benefits of cooperation in service production.

Research limitations/implications

The research focusses on the legitimation of CBSEs in service co-production in rural areas. As legitimation seems to be a context-specific process, future research is needed regarding other contexts.

Practical implications

Municipalities interested in the co-production of services might benefit from establishing a collaborative and responsive (rural) service policy forum that would institutionalise new models of co-production and enable better design and governance of service provision.

Originality/value

Results will give new theoretical and practical insights into the importance of legitimacy in the development of service co-production relationships.

社区社会企业(CBSE)在农村地区提供服务的合法性
目的市政当局寻求在农村地区共同生产服务的新机会。其中一个潜在的合作伙伴就是社区社会企业(CBSEs)。然而,虽然通过社区社会企业共同生产服务模糊了参与者的传统角色,但它可能会导致当地服务提供的合法性危机。本文将从社区社会企业和市政当局的角度,探讨如何将社区社会企业合法化,使其成为农村地区的服务提供者。结果研究结果表明,共同生产模式的合法性尚未确立,支持结构也未制度化,这在社区社区服务机构和市政当局之间造成了不信任,阻碍了双方在服务生产中看到合作的益处。研究局限性/影响研究重点关注社区社区服务机构在农村地区服务共同生产中的合法性。实践意义对服务共同生产感兴趣的市政当局可能会受益于建立一个合作性和响应性的(农村)服务政策论坛,该论坛将使新的共同生产模式制度化,并能更好地设计和管理服务的提供。原创性/价值研究结果将为服务共同生产关系发展中合法性的重要性提供新的理论和实践见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Public Sector Management (IJPSM) publishes academic articles on the management, governance, and reform of public sector organizations around the world, aiming to provide an accessible and valuable resource for academics and public managers alike. IJPSM covers the full range of public management research including studies of organizations, public finances, performance management, Human Resources Management, strategy, leadership, accountability, integrity, collaboration, e-government, procurement, and more. IJPSM encourages scholars to publish their empirical research and is particularly interested in comparative findings. IJPSM is open to articles using a variety of research methods and theoretical approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信