Ethical Considerations in the Treatment of Cerebrovascular Disease

IF 2 4区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Nathan A. Shlobin
{"title":"Ethical Considerations in the Treatment of Cerebrovascular Disease","authors":"Nathan A. Shlobin","doi":"10.1007/s11940-024-00789-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose of Review</h3><p>To care for patients with cerebrovascular disease (CVD), neurointerventionalists, intensivists, and other healthcare providers must be equipped to address associated ethical challenges. This review aims to delineate the applicability of fundamental bioethical approaches to CVD, highlight key ethical issues in CVD care, and delineate an ethical framework to streamline ethical decision-making for people with CVD.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Recent Findings</h3><p>Three introductory cases are presented. The four key principles of principalism and the approach of narrative ethics are described with reference to CVD. Key ethical considerations include decision-making capacity and informed consent, uncertainty, and resource allocation. A categorization of CVD as emergent/nonemergent and the recommended management as intervention/no intervention helps frame the spectrum of CVD. A different six-pathway may then be taken based on which category the patient case corresponds to.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Summary</h3><p>Physicians involved in the care of people with cerebrovascular disease must understand how the ethical issues manifest in individual patient cases to ensure appropriate care. The aforementioned ethical framework may aid physicians in providing ethically sound care. All decisions must involve a balance between clinical expertise and patient values and preferences or those articulated by a surrogate to properly respect the wishes of patients with CVD.</p>","PeriodicalId":10975,"journal":{"name":"Current Treatment Options in Neurology","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Treatment Options in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-024-00789-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of Review

To care for patients with cerebrovascular disease (CVD), neurointerventionalists, intensivists, and other healthcare providers must be equipped to address associated ethical challenges. This review aims to delineate the applicability of fundamental bioethical approaches to CVD, highlight key ethical issues in CVD care, and delineate an ethical framework to streamline ethical decision-making for people with CVD.

Recent Findings

Three introductory cases are presented. The four key principles of principalism and the approach of narrative ethics are described with reference to CVD. Key ethical considerations include decision-making capacity and informed consent, uncertainty, and resource allocation. A categorization of CVD as emergent/nonemergent and the recommended management as intervention/no intervention helps frame the spectrum of CVD. A different six-pathway may then be taken based on which category the patient case corresponds to.

Summary

Physicians involved in the care of people with cerebrovascular disease must understand how the ethical issues manifest in individual patient cases to ensure appropriate care. The aforementioned ethical framework may aid physicians in providing ethically sound care. All decisions must involve a balance between clinical expertise and patient values and preferences or those articulated by a surrogate to properly respect the wishes of patients with CVD.

Abstract Image

治疗脑血管疾病的伦理考量
综述目的为了护理脑血管疾病(CVD)患者,神经介入医生、重症监护医生和其他医疗服务提供者必须具备应对相关伦理挑战的能力。本综述旨在阐明基本生物伦理方法对 CVD 的适用性,强调 CVD 护理中的关键伦理问题,并勾勒出一个伦理框架,以简化 CVD 患者的伦理决策。结合心血管疾病介绍了主体论的四项关键原则和叙事伦理学的方法。主要的伦理考虑因素包括决策能力和知情同意、不确定性和资源分配。将心血管疾病分为急症/非急症,建议的管理分为干预/不干预,有助于确定心血管疾病的范围。小结参与护理脑血管疾病患者的医生必须了解伦理问题在个别患者病例中的表现形式,以确保提供适当的护理。上述伦理框架可帮助医生提供符合伦理的护理。所有决定都必须兼顾临床专业知识与患者的价值观和偏好,或由代理人阐明的价值观和偏好,以适当尊重心血管疾病患者的意愿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal aims to review the most important, recently published treatment option advances in the field of neurology. By presenting clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to facilitate worldwide approaches to the treatment of neurologic conditions. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as epilepsy, headache, neurologic ophthalmology and otology, neuromuscular disorders, psychiatric manifestations of neurologic disease, and sleep disorders. Section Editors select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. We also provide commentaries from well-known neurologists, and an international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信