Effects of biobased fertilisers on soil physical, chemical and biological indicators – a one-year incubation study

IF 1.2 4区 农林科学 Q4 SOIL SCIENCE
Soil Research Pub Date : 2024-03-15 DOI:10.1071/sr23213
Lærke Wester-Larsen, Lars Stoumann Jensen, Johannes Lund Jensen, Dorette Sophie Müller-Stöver
{"title":"Effects of biobased fertilisers on soil physical, chemical and biological indicators – a one-year incubation study","authors":"Lærke Wester-Larsen, Lars Stoumann Jensen, Johannes Lund Jensen, Dorette Sophie Müller-Stöver","doi":"10.1071/sr23213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soil quality is declining in Europe and globally due to agricultural practices and climate change. The European market for novel biobased fertilisers (BBFs) is growing and the new European Union fertiliser regulation promotes their use. However, knowledge about the effects of many novel BBFs on soil quality is currently very limited. In a one-year laboratory incubation experiment, this study aimed to test the effect on biological (microbial biomass carbon (C)), physical (clay dispersibility and water-holding capacity) and chemical (pH, cation exchange capacity (CEC), total C and C in soil size fractions (&lt;250, 50–250 and &gt;50 μm)) soil quality indicators of 10 BBFs applied at two different rates on two soil types: an Arenosol and a Luvisol. The set-up also included a soil that was subjected to long-term annual application of the compost used in the incubation. The application of BBFs generally improved soil quality, with the compost material improving soil quality most, followed by a plant-based fertiliser and a biogas digestate. The effect of BBF application on CEC, total C and particulate organic matter (POM) was related to the amount of total C added with the BBF. Furthermore, the effect on total C and POM fractions was also related to easily decomposable C added with the BBF. Comparing the single accelerated application with annual application under field conditions indicated that the long-term incubation trial is a reasonable predictor of compost long-term effects in the field. Whether this applies to BBFs with very different properties remains to be shown.</p>","PeriodicalId":21818,"journal":{"name":"Soil Research","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/sr23213","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil quality is declining in Europe and globally due to agricultural practices and climate change. The European market for novel biobased fertilisers (BBFs) is growing and the new European Union fertiliser regulation promotes their use. However, knowledge about the effects of many novel BBFs on soil quality is currently very limited. In a one-year laboratory incubation experiment, this study aimed to test the effect on biological (microbial biomass carbon (C)), physical (clay dispersibility and water-holding capacity) and chemical (pH, cation exchange capacity (CEC), total C and C in soil size fractions (<250, 50–250 and >50 μm)) soil quality indicators of 10 BBFs applied at two different rates on two soil types: an Arenosol and a Luvisol. The set-up also included a soil that was subjected to long-term annual application of the compost used in the incubation. The application of BBFs generally improved soil quality, with the compost material improving soil quality most, followed by a plant-based fertiliser and a biogas digestate. The effect of BBF application on CEC, total C and particulate organic matter (POM) was related to the amount of total C added with the BBF. Furthermore, the effect on total C and POM fractions was also related to easily decomposable C added with the BBF. Comparing the single accelerated application with annual application under field conditions indicated that the long-term incubation trial is a reasonable predictor of compost long-term effects in the field. Whether this applies to BBFs with very different properties remains to be shown.

生物基肥料对土壤物理、化学和生物指标的影响--为期一年的培养研究
由于农业生产方式和气候变化,欧洲和全球的土壤质量都在下降。欧洲新型生物基肥料(BBFs)市场正在不断增长,欧盟新的肥料法规也促进了这些肥料的使用。然而,目前有关许多新型生物基肥料对土壤质量影响的知识非常有限。在为期一年的实验室培养实验中,本研究旨在测试 10 种 BBFs 以两种不同的施用率施用在两种土壤类型(Arenosol 和 Luvisol)上对生物(微生物生物量碳 (C))、物理(粘土分散性和持水能力)和化学(pH 值、阳离子交换容量 (CEC)、总碳和土壤粒径分数(250、50-250 和 50 μm)中的碳)土壤质量指标的影响。该试验还包括一种每年长期施用用于培养的堆肥的土壤。施用 BBF 普遍改善了土壤质量,其中堆肥材料对土壤质量的改善最大,其次是植物基肥和沼气沼渣。施用 BBF 对 CEC、总碳和颗粒有机质(POM)的影响与添加 BBF 的总碳量有关。此外,对总 C 和 POM 部分的影响还与添加 BBF 后的易分解 C 有关。将单次加速施肥与田间条件下的全年施肥进行比较表明,长期培养试验可以合理预测堆肥在田间的长期效果。这是否适用于性质迥异的 BBF 还有待证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil Research
Soil Research SOIL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
35
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Soil Research (formerly known as Australian Journal of Soil Research) is an international journal that aims to rapidly publish high-quality, novel research about fundamental and applied aspects of soil science. As well as publishing in traditional aspects of soil biology, soil physics and soil chemistry across terrestrial ecosystems, the journal welcomes manuscripts dealing with wider interactions of soils with the environment. Soil Research is published with the endorsement of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) and the Australian Academy of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信