Acquirer’s Carbon Risk, Host Country Environmental Regulations, Cross-Border M&A and Carbon Emissions: Evidence from China

IF 2.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Jianquan Guo, He Cheng
{"title":"Acquirer’s Carbon Risk, Host Country Environmental Regulations, Cross-Border M&A and Carbon Emissions: Evidence from China","authors":"Jianquan Guo, He Cheng","doi":"10.1007/s41742-024-00580-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Due to imperfect environmental regulation system, developing countries may be treated as “Pollution Havens” by firms from developed countries, imposing impacts on the local and even global environment. Thus, this paper examines the following questions at the country and city levels, respectively: First, whether China’s environmental regulation system (i.e., government and civil environmental regulations) has an impact on the M&amp;A location choices of developed-country acquirers and what the moderating role will the acquirers’ carbon risks play. Second, whether the carbon risks of acquirers from developed countries entering China have an impact on carbon emissions in target regions and what moderating role will the environmental regulation system in the target regions play. By collecting 810 M&amp;A deals from 2002 to 2021 in <i>BvD_Zephyr</i> database and conducting empirical analysis based on logistic, time series, and panel fixed effect regressions, we find that: first, environmental regulations at the country level often have a greater deterrent effect than those at the city level. Second, environmental regulations in China suffer from the problem of a “top down” system, i.e., although government environmental regulations have many measures and thus a high deterrent effect, the effects of civil environmental regulations are poor. Third, attracting foreign investment may help reduce carbon emissions.</p>","PeriodicalId":14121,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-024-00580-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to imperfect environmental regulation system, developing countries may be treated as “Pollution Havens” by firms from developed countries, imposing impacts on the local and even global environment. Thus, this paper examines the following questions at the country and city levels, respectively: First, whether China’s environmental regulation system (i.e., government and civil environmental regulations) has an impact on the M&A location choices of developed-country acquirers and what the moderating role will the acquirers’ carbon risks play. Second, whether the carbon risks of acquirers from developed countries entering China have an impact on carbon emissions in target regions and what moderating role will the environmental regulation system in the target regions play. By collecting 810 M&A deals from 2002 to 2021 in BvD_Zephyr database and conducting empirical analysis based on logistic, time series, and panel fixed effect regressions, we find that: first, environmental regulations at the country level often have a greater deterrent effect than those at the city level. Second, environmental regulations in China suffer from the problem of a “top down” system, i.e., although government environmental regulations have many measures and thus a high deterrent effect, the effects of civil environmental regulations are poor. Third, attracting foreign investment may help reduce carbon emissions.

Abstract Image

收购方的碳风险、东道国环境法规、跨国并购与碳排放:来自中国的证据
由于环境监管体系不完善,发展中国家可能被发达国家的企业视为 "污染天堂",对当地甚至全球环境造成影响。因此,本文分别从国家和城市层面探讨以下问题:首先,中国的环境监管体系(即政府和民间的环境监管)是否会对发达国家收购方的并购地点选择产生影响,以及收购方的碳风险会起到怎样的调节作用。其次,发达国家并购方进入中国的碳风险是否会对目标地区的碳排放产生影响,目标地区的环境监管体系又会起到怎样的调节作用。通过收集 BvD_Zephyr 数据库中 2002 年至 2021 年的 810 笔并购交易,并基于逻辑回归、时间序列回归和面板固定效应回归进行实证分析,我们发现:第一,国家层面的环境监管往往比城市层面的环境监管具有更大的威慑力。第二,中国的环境法规存在 "自上而下 "的问题,即政府环境法规措施多,威慑力大,但民间环境法规效果差。第三,吸引外资有助于减少碳排放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Environmental Research is a multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of environment. In pursuit of these, environmentalist disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. International Journal of Environmental Research publishes original research papers, research notes and reviews across the broad field of environment. These include but are not limited to environmental science, environmental engineering, environmental management and planning and environmental design, urban and regional landscape design and natural disaster management. Thus high quality research papers or reviews dealing with any aspect of environment are welcomed. Papers may be theoretical, interpretative or experimental.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信