Fentanyl initiation rate following the requirement for specialist approval

Oren Miron, Yael Wolff Sagy, Mark Levin, Esti Lubich, Jordan Lewinski, Maya Shpunt, Wiessam Abu Ahmad, Ilya Borochov, Doron Netzer, Gil Lavie
{"title":"Fentanyl initiation rate following the requirement for specialist approval","authors":"Oren Miron, Yael Wolff Sagy, Mark Levin, Esti Lubich, Jordan Lewinski, Maya Shpunt, Wiessam Abu Ahmad, Ilya Borochov, Doron Netzer, Gil Lavie","doi":"10.1101/2024.03.13.24304188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Importance Healthcare organizations are exploring tools to address unwarranted fentanyl use which often leads to increased risk of addiction and overdose. Objective To assess the impact of a requirement for a specialist's approval on fentanyl initiation for non-oncological pain.\nDesign, Settings and Participants Retrospective cohort examination of fentanyl initiations and opioid dispensations for 4.4 million members of Clalit Health Services following a requirement for specialist's approval for fentanyl initiation on July 2022, which was expanded 6 months later for continued use.\nMain Outcomes and Measures We analyzed the change in initiations of fentanyl in the year before and after the implementation and 95% confidence interval, with a sub-group analysis by age group. We also compared total opioid dispensation, fentanyl, and non-fentanyl in the 6th and 12th month after the implementation with the predicted rate based on pre-implementation rates. Results The fentanyl initiation rate in the year before the requirement was 711/1,000,000 capita, which decreased following the requirement by -81% (95% confidence interval:-77%; -85%). The decrease attenuated with age: at ages 0-17 years -100% (16%; -216%), at ages 18-39 years -88% (-78%; -97%), at ages 40-64 years -89% (-83%; -95%) and at ages 65 years and above -73% (-68%; -79%). In the 6th month after the requirement was implemented the morphine milligram equivalent from dispensation of total opioids and fentanyl was lower than predicted by 7% and 12% respectively, while non-fentanyl opioids dispensation was 3% higher than predicted. In the 12th month after the initiation requirement, the dispensation of total opioids and fentanyl was lower than predicted by 26% and 39% respectively, while in non-fentanyl opioids it was 4% higher than predicted.\nConclusions and Relevance Our results indicate that requiring specialist approval for fentanyl initiation for non-oncological chronic pain was associated with a decrease in fentanyl prescription initiations, especially among non-elderly patients. A decrease also occurred gradually in total opioid dispensations, further decreasing following the extension of the requirement to continuous fentanyl. These findings suggest that requiring specialist approval for non-oncological fentanyl initiations is likely an effective strategy to be considered by other healthcare providers.","PeriodicalId":501282,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Addiction Medicine","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Addiction Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.13.24304188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance Healthcare organizations are exploring tools to address unwarranted fentanyl use which often leads to increased risk of addiction and overdose. Objective To assess the impact of a requirement for a specialist's approval on fentanyl initiation for non-oncological pain. Design, Settings and Participants Retrospective cohort examination of fentanyl initiations and opioid dispensations for 4.4 million members of Clalit Health Services following a requirement for specialist's approval for fentanyl initiation on July 2022, which was expanded 6 months later for continued use. Main Outcomes and Measures We analyzed the change in initiations of fentanyl in the year before and after the implementation and 95% confidence interval, with a sub-group analysis by age group. We also compared total opioid dispensation, fentanyl, and non-fentanyl in the 6th and 12th month after the implementation with the predicted rate based on pre-implementation rates. Results The fentanyl initiation rate in the year before the requirement was 711/1,000,000 capita, which decreased following the requirement by -81% (95% confidence interval:-77%; -85%). The decrease attenuated with age: at ages 0-17 years -100% (16%; -216%), at ages 18-39 years -88% (-78%; -97%), at ages 40-64 years -89% (-83%; -95%) and at ages 65 years and above -73% (-68%; -79%). In the 6th month after the requirement was implemented the morphine milligram equivalent from dispensation of total opioids and fentanyl was lower than predicted by 7% and 12% respectively, while non-fentanyl opioids dispensation was 3% higher than predicted. In the 12th month after the initiation requirement, the dispensation of total opioids and fentanyl was lower than predicted by 26% and 39% respectively, while in non-fentanyl opioids it was 4% higher than predicted. Conclusions and Relevance Our results indicate that requiring specialist approval for fentanyl initiation for non-oncological chronic pain was associated with a decrease in fentanyl prescription initiations, especially among non-elderly patients. A decrease also occurred gradually in total opioid dispensations, further decreasing following the extension of the requirement to continuous fentanyl. These findings suggest that requiring specialist approval for non-oncological fentanyl initiations is likely an effective strategy to be considered by other healthcare providers.
需要专家批准后的芬太尼启动率
重要性 医疗机构正在探索各种工具来解决芬太尼的不合理使用问题,这种使用往往会导致成瘾和用药过量风险的增加。目的 评估非肿瘤性疼痛患者使用芬太尼需经专科医生批准的要求所产生的影响。主要结果和措施 我们分析了实施前后一年芬太尼使用量的变化和 95% 的置信区间,并按年龄组进行了分组分析。我们还比较了实施后第 6 个月和第 12 个月的阿片类药物总配给量、芬太尼和非芬太尼配给量与根据实施前配给量预测的配给量。结果 要求实施前一年的芬太尼使用率为 711/1,000,000 人均,要求实施后下降了 -81%(95% 置信区间:-77%;-85%)。下降幅度随年龄增长而减小:0-17 岁为 -100% (16%; -216%),18-39 岁为 -88% (-78%; -97%),40-64 岁为 -89% (-83%; -95%),65 岁及以上为 -73% (-68%; -79%)。在该要求实施后的第 6 个月,阿片类药物总量和芬太尼的吗啡毫克当量分别比预测值低 7%和 12%,而非芬太尼阿片类药物的使用量比预测值高 3%。结论和相关性 我们的研究结果表明,非肿瘤性慢性疼痛患者使用芬太尼需要获得专科医生的批准,这与芬太尼处方使用量的减少有关,尤其是在非老年患者中。阿片类药物的总处方量也逐渐减少,在将该要求扩展至持续芬太尼后,阿片类药物的总处方量进一步减少。这些研究结果表明,要求非肿瘤患者使用芬太尼时获得专科医生的批准很可能是一种有效的策略,值得其他医疗服务提供者考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信