Overview of recent cases before the European Court of Human Rights and the European Committee of Social Rights (June 2023 – December 2023)

IF 1.5 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Eleni De Becker
{"title":"Overview of recent cases before the European Court of Human Rights and the European Committee of Social Rights (June 2023 – December 2023)","authors":"Eleni De Becker","doi":"10.1177/13882627241236488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This case law report discusses two cases before the European Court of Human Rights and two cases before the European Committee of Social Rights. The first case (Pająk and others v. Poland) concerns the introduction of a lower and different retirement age on the basis of sex for judges of the Polish Constitutional Court. In the case X and others v. Ireland, the ECtHR had to examine the extent to which the residence requirement for child benefits violated Article 14 ECHR, read in conjunction with Article 8 ECHR and Article 1 of the Additional Protocol to the ECHR. Child benefits were paid only to claimants who were fully resident in Ireland, and the applicants, who were awaiting a decision on their residency status, did not fulfil this requirement under Irish law. The collective complaint no. 167/2018 (Sindacato autonomo Pensionati Or.S.A. v. Italy) concerned an alleged violation of Article 12 (3) ESC due to the total or partial suspension of the automatic indexation of a large share of pensions in 2011. The measure was extended in 2015 and revised in 2018, taking into account the position of particularly vulnerable persons. In the last case (collective complaint no. 185/2019, European Roma Rights Centre (ERRC) v. Belgium), the applicants argued that their right to social assistance had been violated, as they had not received social assistance benefits following a police investigation. The ECSR did not go along with the applicants’ claim.","PeriodicalId":44670,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Social Security","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Social Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13882627241236488","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This case law report discusses two cases before the European Court of Human Rights and two cases before the European Committee of Social Rights. The first case (Pająk and others v. Poland) concerns the introduction of a lower and different retirement age on the basis of sex for judges of the Polish Constitutional Court. In the case X and others v. Ireland, the ECtHR had to examine the extent to which the residence requirement for child benefits violated Article 14 ECHR, read in conjunction with Article 8 ECHR and Article 1 of the Additional Protocol to the ECHR. Child benefits were paid only to claimants who were fully resident in Ireland, and the applicants, who were awaiting a decision on their residency status, did not fulfil this requirement under Irish law. The collective complaint no. 167/2018 (Sindacato autonomo Pensionati Or.S.A. v. Italy) concerned an alleged violation of Article 12 (3) ESC due to the total or partial suspension of the automatic indexation of a large share of pensions in 2011. The measure was extended in 2015 and revised in 2018, taking into account the position of particularly vulnerable persons. In the last case (collective complaint no. 185/2019, European Roma Rights Centre (ERRC) v. Belgium), the applicants argued that their right to social assistance had been violated, as they had not received social assistance benefits following a police investigation. The ECSR did not go along with the applicants’ claim.
欧洲人权法院和欧洲社会权利委员会近期审理的案件概览(2023 年 6 月至 2023 年 12 月)
本判例法报告讨论了欧洲人权法院审理的两个案件和欧洲社会权利委员会审理的两个案件。第一起案件(Pająk 等人诉波兰)涉及对波兰宪法法院的法官实行基于性别的较低和不同的退休年龄。在 X 等人诉爱尔兰案中,欧洲人权法院必须审查儿童福利的居住要求在多大程度上违反了《欧洲人权公约》第 14 条(与《欧洲人权公约》第 8 条和《欧洲人权公约附加议定书》第 1 条一并解读)。儿童福利只支付给完全居住在爱尔兰的申请人,而申请人正在等待关于其居住身份的决定,根据爱尔兰法律,他们不符合这一要求。第 167/2018 号集体申诉(Sindacato autonomo Pensionati Or.S.A.诉意大利)涉及据称违反《经济、社会、文化权利国际公约》第 12(3)条的行为,原因是 2011 年全部或部分暂停了大部分养老金的自动指数化。考虑到特别弱势者的处境,该措施于 2015 年延长,并于 2018 年修订。在最后一个案件(第 185/2019 号集体申诉,欧洲罗姆人权利中心(ERRC)诉比利时)中, 申诉人辩称,他们获得社会援助的权利受到了侵犯,因为在警方调查后,他们没有获得社会 援助福利。欧洲社会权利中心不同意申请人的主张。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Social Security
European Journal of Social Security PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信