Impact of Simulation Manikins to Train Pharmacy Students in Nasal, Throat, and Oral Fluid Swab Collection.

Innovations in pharmacy Pub Date : 2023-11-20 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.24926/iip.v14i4.5046
Ginelle A Bryant, Michelle M Bottenberg, Hayden L Smith, MacKenzie Challoner, Tarah Fisher
{"title":"Impact of Simulation Manikins to Train Pharmacy Students in Nasal, Throat, and Oral Fluid Swab Collection.","authors":"Ginelle A Bryant, Michelle M Bottenberg, Hayden L Smith, MacKenzie Challoner, Tarah Fisher","doi":"10.24926/iip.v14i4.5046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Introduction:</i> A point-of-care testing (POCT) certificate was implemented in a required pharmacy skills-based course. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of manikins on student confidence in performing POCT swabs for infectious diseases. <i>Innovation:</i> Manikins were used to train second-year pharmacy students on nasal swabs, throat swabs, and oral fluid swabs. Student skills were assessed on manikins first, then on a peer. Proficiency was defined as a score of 90% or higher. Students completed a pre- and post-training survey regarding their confidence performing swabs. Student confidence was based on Likert style responses (i.e., 'Strongly Disagree' [score: 1], to 'Strongly Agree' [score: 5]) performing the swabs. Median change in confidence was calculated using quantile regression. <i>Findings:</i> All students (n=63) demonstrated proficiency in performing swabs. Median confidence for nasal, throat, and oral fluid swabs changed by 2.0 (95% CI: 1.5, 2.5), 2.0 (95% CI: 1.5, 2.5), and 2.0 (95%CI: 1.3, 2.7), respectively. The majority of students reported time spent practicing was adequate for the nasal (n=51, 81%), throat (n=51, 81%), and oral fluid swab (n=59, 94%). All participating students reported manikins to be moderately (n=17, 27%) or extremely (n=46, 73%) valuable, and all students rated their overall experience with manikins as positive (n=63, 100%). Student comments revealed manikins helped to visualize anatomy, practice skills without peer discomfort, and minimize risk during the COVID-19 pandemic. <i>Conclusion:</i> This study demonstrated that inclusion of practice on manikins increased student confidence in performing POCT for infectious diseases. In addition, the majority of students indicated that the use of manikins was valuable to their learning and reported feeling prepared to perform POCT in practice after using the manikins.</p>","PeriodicalId":501014,"journal":{"name":"Innovations in pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10939491/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations in pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v14i4.5046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: A point-of-care testing (POCT) certificate was implemented in a required pharmacy skills-based course. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of manikins on student confidence in performing POCT swabs for infectious diseases. Innovation: Manikins were used to train second-year pharmacy students on nasal swabs, throat swabs, and oral fluid swabs. Student skills were assessed on manikins first, then on a peer. Proficiency was defined as a score of 90% or higher. Students completed a pre- and post-training survey regarding their confidence performing swabs. Student confidence was based on Likert style responses (i.e., 'Strongly Disagree' [score: 1], to 'Strongly Agree' [score: 5]) performing the swabs. Median change in confidence was calculated using quantile regression. Findings: All students (n=63) demonstrated proficiency in performing swabs. Median confidence for nasal, throat, and oral fluid swabs changed by 2.0 (95% CI: 1.5, 2.5), 2.0 (95% CI: 1.5, 2.5), and 2.0 (95%CI: 1.3, 2.7), respectively. The majority of students reported time spent practicing was adequate for the nasal (n=51, 81%), throat (n=51, 81%), and oral fluid swab (n=59, 94%). All participating students reported manikins to be moderately (n=17, 27%) or extremely (n=46, 73%) valuable, and all students rated their overall experience with manikins as positive (n=63, 100%). Student comments revealed manikins helped to visualize anatomy, practice skills without peer discomfort, and minimize risk during the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that inclusion of practice on manikins increased student confidence in performing POCT for infectious diseases. In addition, the majority of students indicated that the use of manikins was valuable to their learning and reported feeling prepared to perform POCT in practice after using the manikins.

模拟人体模型对培训药学专业学生采集鼻腔、咽喉和口腔液拭子的影响。
导言:在药剂学技能必修课程中开设了护理点检测(POCT)证书课程。本研究旨在评估人体模型对学生进行传染病 POCT 拭子测试的信心的影响。创新:使用人体模型对药剂学二年级学生进行鼻拭子、咽拭子和口腔液拭子的培训。首先在人体模型上评估学生的技能,然后在同伴身上进行评估。熟练程度的定义是 90% 或更高的分数。学生在培训前和培训后都填写了一份关于他们执行咽拭子操作的信心调查表。学生的信心基于对棉签操作的李克特式回答(即 "非常不同意"[1 分] 到 "非常同意"[5 分])。使用量子回归法计算了信心变化的中位数。结果所有学生(n=63)都熟练掌握了咽拭子的操作。鼻腔、咽喉和口腔液咽拭子的信心变化中位数分别为 2.0(95% CI:1.5,2.5)、2.0(95% CI:1.5,2.5)和 2.0(95% CI:1.3,2.7)。大多数学生表示鼻腔(51 人,81%)、咽喉(51 人,81%)和口腔液拭抹试验(59 人,94%)的练习时间充足。所有参与的学生都认为人体模型具有中等(n=17,27%)或极高(n=46,73%)的价值,所有学生对使用人体模型的总体体验都给予了积极的评价(n=63,100%)。学生的评论显示,人体模型有助于直观了解解剖结构,在没有同伴不适的情况下练习技能,并在 COVID-19 大流行期间将风险降至最低。结论:这项研究表明,在人体模型上进行练习增强了学生对进行传染病 POCT 的信心。此外,大多数学生表示,使用人体模型对他们的学习很有价值,并表示在使用人体模型后,感觉为在实践中进行 POCT 做好了准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信