DERM Author Taken to the Cleaners by a Reviewer: So, Do You Think the Reviewer of Your Submission Was Unkind? Read This.

Skinmed Pub Date : 2024-03-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01
Mark C Valentine
{"title":"DERM Author Taken to the Cleaners by a Reviewer: So, Do You Think the Reviewer of Your Submission Was Unkind? Read This.","authors":"Mark C Valentine","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Highly critical reviews of medical books are rarely encountered in our age, but this was not always the case. I provide an example of a very negative review of an early medical book that may have blocked the author from further publication.Papers published in reputable journals are subjected to review by experts, whose task is to find weakness in research and/or flaws in its arguments. Published reviews of textbooks that appear these days are generally laudatory, calling attention to the strengths of the book with little mention of any shortcomings. Non-meritorious works are usually winnowed out by the editing process and never make it to publication.</p>","PeriodicalId":94206,"journal":{"name":"Skinmed","volume":"22 1","pages":"14-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skinmed","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Highly critical reviews of medical books are rarely encountered in our age, but this was not always the case. I provide an example of a very negative review of an early medical book that may have blocked the author from further publication.Papers published in reputable journals are subjected to review by experts, whose task is to find weakness in research and/or flaws in its arguments. Published reviews of textbooks that appear these days are generally laudatory, calling attention to the strengths of the book with little mention of any shortcomings. Non-meritorious works are usually winnowed out by the editing process and never make it to publication.

DERM 作者被审稿人告上清洁工:那么,你认为你的作品的审稿人不近人情吗?读读这个。
在我们这个时代,对医学书籍的高度批评性评论很少见,但情况并非总是如此。在知名期刊上发表的论文都要经过专家的审阅,他们的任务是找出研究中的弱点和/或论点中的缺陷。如今出版的教科书评论一般都是赞誉性的,只关注书中的优点,很少提及缺点。不值得称赞的作品通常会在编辑过程中被筛选掉,永远无法出版。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信