Neuromuscular Control and Resistance Training for People With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Joshua B Farragher, Adrian Pranata, Gavin P Williams, Doa El-Ansary, Selina M Parry, Ross A Clark, Benjamin Mentiplay, Jessica Kasza, Samuel Crofts, Adam L Bryant
{"title":"Neuromuscular Control and Resistance Training for People With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Joshua B Farragher, Adrian Pranata, Gavin P Williams, Doa El-Ansary, Selina M Parry, Ross A Clark, Benjamin Mentiplay, Jessica Kasza, Samuel Crofts, Adam L Bryant","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2024.12349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To determine if adding lumbar neuromuscular control retraining exercises to a 12-week program of strengthening exercises had greater effect for improving disability than 12 weeks of strengthening exercises alone in people with chronic low back pain (LBP). <b>DESIGN:</b> Single-center, participant- and assessor-blinded, comparative effectiveness randomized controlled trial. <b>METHODS:</b> Sixty-nine participants (31 females; 29 males; mean age: 46.5 years) with nonspecific chronic LBP were recruited for a 12-week program involving lumbar extension neuromuscular retraining in addition to resistance exercises (intervention) or 12 weeks of resistance exercises alone (control). The primary outcome measure was the Oswestry Disability Index. Secondary outcome measures included the Numeric Rating Scale, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. Outcomes were measured at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks. <b>RESULTS:</b> Forty-three participants (22 control, 21 intervention) completed all outcome measures at 6 and 12 weeks. Fourteen participants were lost to follow-up, and 12 participants discontinued due to COVID-19 restrictions. Both groups demonstrated clinically important changes in disability, pain intensity, and kinesiophobia. The difference between groups with respect to disability was imprecise and not clinically meaningful (mean difference, -4.4; 95% CI: -10.2, 1.4) at 12 weeks. Differences in secondary outcomes at 6 or 12 weeks were also small with wide confidence intervals. <b>CONCLUSIONS</b>: Adding lumbar neuromuscular control retraining to a series of resistance exercises offered no additional benefit over resistance exercises alone over a 12-week period. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(5):1-10. Epub 18 March 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12349</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"350-359"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2024.12349","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if adding lumbar neuromuscular control retraining exercises to a 12-week program of strengthening exercises had greater effect for improving disability than 12 weeks of strengthening exercises alone in people with chronic low back pain (LBP). DESIGN: Single-center, participant- and assessor-blinded, comparative effectiveness randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Sixty-nine participants (31 females; 29 males; mean age: 46.5 years) with nonspecific chronic LBP were recruited for a 12-week program involving lumbar extension neuromuscular retraining in addition to resistance exercises (intervention) or 12 weeks of resistance exercises alone (control). The primary outcome measure was the Oswestry Disability Index. Secondary outcome measures included the Numeric Rating Scale, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. Outcomes were measured at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks. RESULTS: Forty-three participants (22 control, 21 intervention) completed all outcome measures at 6 and 12 weeks. Fourteen participants were lost to follow-up, and 12 participants discontinued due to COVID-19 restrictions. Both groups demonstrated clinically important changes in disability, pain intensity, and kinesiophobia. The difference between groups with respect to disability was imprecise and not clinically meaningful (mean difference, -4.4; 95% CI: -10.2, 1.4) at 12 weeks. Differences in secondary outcomes at 6 or 12 weeks were also small with wide confidence intervals. CONCLUSIONS: Adding lumbar neuromuscular control retraining to a series of resistance exercises offered no additional benefit over resistance exercises alone over a 12-week period. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(5):1-10. Epub 18 March 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12349.

针对慢性腰背痛患者的神经肌肉控制和阻力训练:随机对照试验。
目的:确定在为期 12 周的加强锻炼计划中加入腰部神经肌肉控制再训练是否比单独进行为期 12 周的加强锻炼更能有效改善慢性腰背痛患者的残疾状况。设计:单中心、参与者和评估者盲法、比较效果随机对照试验。方法:招募 69 名非特异性慢性腰背痛患者(31 名女性;29 名男性;平均年龄 46.5 岁),对其进行为期 12 周的腰部伸展神经肌肉再训练,同时进行抗阻力锻炼(干预)或单独进行为期 12 周的抗阻力锻炼(对照)。主要结果指标为 Oswestry 残疾指数。次要结果测量包括数字评分量表、坦帕运动恐惧症量表、疼痛自我效能问卷和国际体育活动问卷。结果在基线、6 周和 12 周时进行测量。结果:43 名参与者(22 名对照组;21 名干预组)在 6 周和 12 周时完成了所有结果测量。14 名参与者失去了随访机会,12 名参与者因 COVID-19 限制而中止随访。两组患者在残疾程度、疼痛强度和运动恐惧方面都有重要的临床变化。在 12 周时,两组在残疾方面的差异不精确,没有临床意义(平均差异为-4.4,95% CI [-10.2, 1.4])。6周或12周时次要结果的差异也很小,置信区间较宽。结论:在一系列阻力练习中加入腰部神经肌肉控制再训练,与单独进行阻力练习相比,在12周的时间内没有额外的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy® (JOSPT®) publishes scientifically rigorous, clinically relevant content for physical therapists and others in the health care community to advance musculoskeletal and sports-related practice globally. To this end, JOSPT features the latest evidence-based research and clinical cases in musculoskeletal health, injury, and rehabilitation, including physical therapy, orthopaedics, sports medicine, and biomechanics. With an impact factor of 3.090, JOSPT is among the highest ranked physical therapy journals in Clarivate Analytics''s Journal Citation Reports, Science Edition (2017). JOSPT stands eighth of 65 journals in the category of rehabilitation, twelfth of 77 journals in orthopedics, and fourteenth of 81 journals in sport sciences. JOSPT''s 5-year impact factor is 4.061.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信