Dropout in a clinical trial for comorbid PTSD and MDD among US service members: Are pretreatment characteristics predictive?

IF 2.6 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Psychotherapy Research Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-18 DOI:10.1080/10503307.2024.2325519
Alexander C Kline, Nicholas P Otis, Sonya B Norman, W Michael Hunt, Kristen H Walter
{"title":"Dropout in a clinical trial for comorbid PTSD and MDD among US service members: Are pretreatment characteristics predictive?","authors":"Alexander C Kline, Nicholas P Otis, Sonya B Norman, W Michael Hunt, Kristen H Walter","doi":"10.1080/10503307.2024.2325519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Despite effective treatment options for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), many patients do not complete therapy. This includes U.S. active duty service members, yet factors linked to attendance in this population remain understudied and dropout remains difficult to predict. Additionally, most studies have not examined samples with PTSD and co-occurring major depressive disorder (MDD) despite high rates of comorbidity.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The current study explored predictors of dropout among service members with comorbid PTSD and MDD (<i>N</i> = 94) randomized to cognitive processing therapy enhanced with behavioral activation (BA + CPT) or CPT as part of a clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using the Fournier approach, only two predictors were associated with lower dropout risk among over 20 examined: shorter duration between pretreatment assessment and Session 1 (<i>p</i> = .041) and past 3-month PTSD treatment engagement (<i>p</i> = .036).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results suggest the possible utility of early momentum in starting therapy and leveraging recent treatment to improve attendance. However, this study also highlights the possible limitations of commonly assessed pretreatment factors in predicting attendance and current challenges in measuring dropout risk. Strategies to improve prediction, such as shifting focus to assess modifiable factors and processes more proximal to dropout during treatment, may be needed.<b>Trial registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02874131.</p>","PeriodicalId":48159,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy Research","volume":" ","pages":"614-626"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2024.2325519","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Despite effective treatment options for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), many patients do not complete therapy. This includes U.S. active duty service members, yet factors linked to attendance in this population remain understudied and dropout remains difficult to predict. Additionally, most studies have not examined samples with PTSD and co-occurring major depressive disorder (MDD) despite high rates of comorbidity.

Method: The current study explored predictors of dropout among service members with comorbid PTSD and MDD (N = 94) randomized to cognitive processing therapy enhanced with behavioral activation (BA + CPT) or CPT as part of a clinical trial.

Results: Using the Fournier approach, only two predictors were associated with lower dropout risk among over 20 examined: shorter duration between pretreatment assessment and Session 1 (p = .041) and past 3-month PTSD treatment engagement (p = .036).

Conclusion: Results suggest the possible utility of early momentum in starting therapy and leveraging recent treatment to improve attendance. However, this study also highlights the possible limitations of commonly assessed pretreatment factors in predicting attendance and current challenges in measuring dropout risk. Strategies to improve prediction, such as shifting focus to assess modifiable factors and processes more proximal to dropout during treatment, may be needed.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02874131.

美国军人中合并创伤后应激障碍和抑郁障碍的临床试验中的辍学现象:治疗前的特征是否具有预测性?
目的:尽管创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的治疗方法很有效,但许多患者并没有完成治疗。这其中就包括美国现役军人,但与这一人群接受治疗有关的因素仍未得到充分研究,辍学情况仍难以预测。此外,尽管创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和重度抑郁障碍(MDD)的合并率很高,但大多数研究都没有对这一人群进行研究:本研究探讨了在临床试验中随机接受认知加工疗法(BA + CPT)或认知加工疗法(CPT)治疗的并发创伤后应激障碍和重度抑郁症患者(N = 94)的辍学预测因素:采用傅尼叶方法,在超过 20 个受试者中,只有两个预测因素与较低的辍学风险相关:治疗前评估与疗程 1 之间的持续时间较短(p = .041),以及创伤后应激障碍治疗参与时间超过 3 个月(p = .036):研究结果表明,尽早开始治疗和利用最近的治疗来提高就诊率可能是有用的。然而,本研究也强调了通常评估的治疗前因素在预测出勤率方面可能存在的局限性,以及目前在衡量辍学风险方面所面临的挑战。可能需要改进预测的策略,如将重点转移到评估可改变的因素和治疗期间更接近辍学的过程:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:NCT02874131.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychotherapy Research
Psychotherapy Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
10.30%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy Research seeks to enhance the development, scientific quality, and social relevance of psychotherapy research and to foster the use of research findings in practice, education, and policy formulation. The Journal publishes reports of original research on all aspects of psychotherapy, including its outcomes, its processes, education of practitioners, and delivery of services. It also publishes methodological, theoretical, and review articles of direct relevance to psychotherapy research. The Journal is addressed to an international, interdisciplinary audience and welcomes submissions dealing with diverse theoretical orientations, treatment modalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信