Exploring the Major Barriers to Physical Activity in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis: Observational Longitudinal Study.

Q2 Medicine
Chloé Sieber, Christina Haag, Ashley Polhemus, Sarah R Haile, Ramona Sylvester, Jan Kool, Roman Gonzenbach, Viktor von Wyl
{"title":"Exploring the Major Barriers to Physical Activity in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis: Observational Longitudinal Study.","authors":"Chloé Sieber, Christina Haag, Ashley Polhemus, Sarah R Haile, Ramona Sylvester, Jan Kool, Roman Gonzenbach, Viktor von Wyl","doi":"10.2196/52733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physical activity (PA) represents a low-cost and readily available means of mitigating multiple sclerosis (MS) symptoms and alleviating the disease course. Nevertheless, persons with MS engage in lower levels of PA than the general population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to enhance the understanding of the barriers to PA engagement in persons with MS and to evaluate the applicability of the Barriers to Health Promoting Activities for Disabled Persons (BHADP) scale for assessing barriers to PA in persons with MS, by comparing the BHADP score with self-reported outcomes of fatigue, depression, self-efficacy, and health-related quality of life, as well as sensor-measured PA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Study participants (n=45; median age 46, IQR 40-51 years; median Expanded Disability Status Scale score 4.5, IQR 3.5-6) were recruited among persons with MS attending inpatient neurorehabilitation. They wore a Fitbit Inspire HR (Fitbit Inc) throughout their stay at the rehabilitation clinic (phase 1; 2-4 wk) and for the 4 following weeks at home (phase 2; 4 wk). Sensor-based step counts and cumulative minutes in moderate to vigorous PA were computed for the last 7 days at the clinic and at home. On the basis of PA during the last 7 end-of-study days, we grouped the study participants as active (≥10,000 steps/d) and less active (<10,000 steps/d) to explore PA barriers compared with PA level. PA barriers were repeatedly assessed through the BHADP scale. We described the relevance of the 18 barriers of the BHADP scale assessed at the end of the study and quantified their correlations with the Spearman correlation test. We evaluated the associations of the BHADP score with end-of-study reported outcomes of fatigue, depression, self-efficacy, and health-related quality of life with multivariable regression models. We performed separate regression analyses to examine the association of the BHADP score with different sensor-measured outcomes of PA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The less active group reported higher scores for the BHADP items Feeling what I do doesn't help, No one to help me, and Lack of support from family/friends. The BHADP items Not interested in PA and Impairment were positively correlated. The BHADP score was positively associated with measures of fatigue and depression and negatively associated with self-efficacy and health-related quality of life. The BHADP score showed an inverse relationship with the level of PA measured but not when dichotomized according to the recommended PA level thresholds.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The BHADP scale is a valid and well-adapted tool for persons with MS because it reflects common MS symptoms such as fatigue and depression, as well as self-efficacy and health-related quality of life. Moreover, decreases in PA levels are often related to increases in specific barriers in the lives of persons with MS and should hence be addressed jointly in health care management.</p>","PeriodicalId":36224,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies","volume":"11 ","pages":"e52733"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10985607/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/52733","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Physical activity (PA) represents a low-cost and readily available means of mitigating multiple sclerosis (MS) symptoms and alleviating the disease course. Nevertheless, persons with MS engage in lower levels of PA than the general population.

Objective: This study aims to enhance the understanding of the barriers to PA engagement in persons with MS and to evaluate the applicability of the Barriers to Health Promoting Activities for Disabled Persons (BHADP) scale for assessing barriers to PA in persons with MS, by comparing the BHADP score with self-reported outcomes of fatigue, depression, self-efficacy, and health-related quality of life, as well as sensor-measured PA.

Methods: Study participants (n=45; median age 46, IQR 40-51 years; median Expanded Disability Status Scale score 4.5, IQR 3.5-6) were recruited among persons with MS attending inpatient neurorehabilitation. They wore a Fitbit Inspire HR (Fitbit Inc) throughout their stay at the rehabilitation clinic (phase 1; 2-4 wk) and for the 4 following weeks at home (phase 2; 4 wk). Sensor-based step counts and cumulative minutes in moderate to vigorous PA were computed for the last 7 days at the clinic and at home. On the basis of PA during the last 7 end-of-study days, we grouped the study participants as active (≥10,000 steps/d) and less active (<10,000 steps/d) to explore PA barriers compared with PA level. PA barriers were repeatedly assessed through the BHADP scale. We described the relevance of the 18 barriers of the BHADP scale assessed at the end of the study and quantified their correlations with the Spearman correlation test. We evaluated the associations of the BHADP score with end-of-study reported outcomes of fatigue, depression, self-efficacy, and health-related quality of life with multivariable regression models. We performed separate regression analyses to examine the association of the BHADP score with different sensor-measured outcomes of PA.

Results: The less active group reported higher scores for the BHADP items Feeling what I do doesn't help, No one to help me, and Lack of support from family/friends. The BHADP items Not interested in PA and Impairment were positively correlated. The BHADP score was positively associated with measures of fatigue and depression and negatively associated with self-efficacy and health-related quality of life. The BHADP score showed an inverse relationship with the level of PA measured but not when dichotomized according to the recommended PA level thresholds.

Conclusions: The BHADP scale is a valid and well-adapted tool for persons with MS because it reflects common MS symptoms such as fatigue and depression, as well as self-efficacy and health-related quality of life. Moreover, decreases in PA levels are often related to increases in specific barriers in the lives of persons with MS and should hence be addressed jointly in health care management.

探索多发性硬化症患者参加体育活动的主要障碍:观察性纵向研究。
背景:体育锻炼(PA)是减轻多发性硬化症(MS)症状和缓解病程的一种低成本、现成的方法。然而,多发性硬化症患者的体育锻炼水平却低于普通人群:本研究旨在通过比较 BHADP 评分与疲劳、抑郁、自我效能感、健康相关生活质量等自我报告结果以及传感器测量的 PA,加深对多发性硬化症患者参与 PA 的障碍的了解,并评估残疾人健康促进活动障碍量表(BHADP)在评估多发性硬化症患者参与 PA 的障碍方面的适用性:研究参与者(45 人;中位年龄 46 岁,IQR 40-51 岁;中位残疾状况扩展量表评分 4.5 分,IQR 3.5-6 分)从接受住院神经康复治疗的多发性硬化症患者中招募。他们在康复诊所的整个住院期间(第一阶段;2-4 周)和随后在家的 4 周内(第二阶段;4 周)都佩戴着 Fitbit Inspire HR(Fitbit 公司)。在康复诊所和家中的最后 7 天,计算基于传感器的步数和中度至剧烈运动的累计分钟数。根据最后 7 个研究结束日的运动量,我们将研究参与者分为活跃组(≥10,000 步/天)和不太活跃组(结果:不太活跃组的运动量评分较高,而活跃组的运动量评分较低):较不活跃组在 "感觉我所做的事情对我没有帮助"、"没有人帮助我 "和 "缺乏家人/朋友的支持 "等 BHADP 项目中得分较高。BHADP 项目 "对体育锻炼不感兴趣 "和 "身体受损 "呈正相关。BHADP 分值与疲劳和抑郁测量呈正相关,与自我效能感和健康相关生活质量呈负相关。BHADP得分与所测量的PA水平呈反向关系,但根据建议的PA水平阈值进行二分时则不呈反向关系:BHADP量表是一种有效且适用于多发性硬化症患者的工具,因为它能反映多发性硬化症的常见症状,如疲劳和抑郁,以及自我效能和与健康相关的生活质量。此外,多发性硬化症患者活动量的减少往往与生活中特定障碍的增加有关,因此应在医疗保健管理中共同加以解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信