Contemporary Management of Blunt Splenic Trauma in Adults: An Analysis of the Trauma Quality Improvement Program Registry

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
{"title":"Contemporary Management of Blunt Splenic Trauma in Adults: An Analysis of the Trauma Quality Improvement Program Registry","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jacr.2024.03.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of management strategies for blunt splenic injuries in adult patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients 18 years and older with blunt splenic injuries registered via the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2013-2019) were identified. Management strategies initiated within 24 hours of hospital presentation were classified as watchful waiting, embolization<span>, surgery, or combination therapy. Patients were stratified by injury grade. Linear models estimated each strategy’s effect on hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, and mortality.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 81,033 included patients, 86.3%, 10.9%, 2.5%, and 0.3% of patients received watchful waiting, surgery, embolization, and combination therapy, respectively. Among patients with low-grade injuries and compared with surgery, embolization was associated with shorter hospital LOS (9.4 days, <em>Q</em> &lt; .001, Cohen’s <em>d</em> = .30) and ICU LOS (5.0 days, <em>Q</em> &lt; .001, Cohen’s <em>d</em> = .44). Among patients with high-grade injuries and compared with surgery, embolization was associated with shorter hospital LOS (8.7 days, <em>Q</em> &lt; .001, Cohen’s <em>d</em> = .12) and ICU LOS (4.5 days, <em>Q</em> &lt; .001, Cohen’s <em>d</em> = .23). Among patients with low- and high-grade injuries, the odds ratios for in-hospital mortality associated with surgery compared with embolization were 4.02 (<em>Q</em> &lt; .001) and 4.38 (<em>Q</em> &lt; .001), respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Among patients presenting with blunt splenic injuries and compared with surgery, embolization was associated with shorter hospital LOS, shorter ICU LOS, and lower risk for mortality.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1546144024002916","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of management strategies for blunt splenic injuries in adult patients.

Methods

Patients 18 years and older with blunt splenic injuries registered via the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2013-2019) were identified. Management strategies initiated within 24 hours of hospital presentation were classified as watchful waiting, embolization, surgery, or combination therapy. Patients were stratified by injury grade. Linear models estimated each strategy’s effect on hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, and mortality.

Results

Of 81,033 included patients, 86.3%, 10.9%, 2.5%, and 0.3% of patients received watchful waiting, surgery, embolization, and combination therapy, respectively. Among patients with low-grade injuries and compared with surgery, embolization was associated with shorter hospital LOS (9.4 days, Q < .001, Cohen’s d = .30) and ICU LOS (5.0 days, Q < .001, Cohen’s d = .44). Among patients with high-grade injuries and compared with surgery, embolization was associated with shorter hospital LOS (8.7 days, Q < .001, Cohen’s d = .12) and ICU LOS (4.5 days, Q < .001, Cohen’s d = .23). Among patients with low- and high-grade injuries, the odds ratios for in-hospital mortality associated with surgery compared with embolization were 4.02 (Q < .001) and 4.38 (Q < .001), respectively.

Conclusions

Among patients presenting with blunt splenic injuries and compared with surgery, embolization was associated with shorter hospital LOS, shorter ICU LOS, and lower risk for mortality.

成人钝性脾脏创伤的现代处理方法:创伤质量改进计划登记分析》。
目的:评估成年患者钝性脾损伤处理策略的有效性:通过创伤质量改进计划(2013-19 年)登记的 18 岁及以上钝性脾损伤患者。入院 24 小时内启动的治疗策略分为观察等待(WW)、栓塞、手术或综合治疗。患者按损伤等级进行分层。线性模型估算了每种策略对住院时间(LOS)、重症监护室(ICU)住院时间和死亡率的影响:在纳入的81033名患者中,分别有86.3%、10.9%、2.5%和0.3%的患者接受了WW、手术、栓塞和综合治疗。在低级别损伤患者中,与手术相比,栓塞治疗缩短了住院时间(9.4天,Q < .001,Cohen's d = .30)和重症监护室住院时间(5.0天,Q < .001,Cohen's d = .44)。在高级别损伤患者中,与手术相比,栓塞治疗缩短了住院时间(8.7 天,Q < .001,Cohen's d = .12)和重症监护室住院时间(4.5 天,Q < .001,Cohen's d = .23)。在低度和高度损伤患者中,与栓塞相比,手术的院内死亡率几率比分别为4.02(Q < .001)和4.38(Q < .001):结论:在钝性脾损伤患者中,与手术相比,栓塞治疗的住院时间更短、重症监护室住院时间更短、死亡风险更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American College of Radiology
Journal of the American College of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.90%
发文量
312
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The official journal of the American College of Radiology, JACR informs its readers of timely, pertinent, and important topics affecting the practice of diagnostic radiologists, interventional radiologists, medical physicists, and radiation oncologists. In so doing, JACR improves their practices and helps optimize their role in the health care system. By providing a forum for informative, well-written articles on health policy, clinical practice, practice management, data science, and education, JACR engages readers in a dialogue that ultimately benefits patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信