Budget impact analyses for treatment of heart failure. A systematic review.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Heart Failure Reviews Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-16 DOI:10.1007/s10741-024-10397-8
Abedin Teimourizad, Abdosaleh Jafari, Firooz Esmaeilzadeh
{"title":"Budget impact analyses for treatment of heart failure. A systematic review.","authors":"Abedin Teimourizad, Abdosaleh Jafari, Firooz Esmaeilzadeh","doi":"10.1007/s10741-024-10397-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Heart failure (HF) is increasing globally and turning out to be a serious worldwide public health problem with significant morbidity and mortality. This study aims to systemically review the budget impact analysis of heart failure treatments on health care expenditure worldwide. Scientific databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched for budget impact analysis and heart failure treatments, over January 2001 to August 2023. The quality assessment of the selected studies was evaluated through ISPOR practice guideline. Nineteen studies were included in this systematic review. Based on ISPOR recommendations, most studies were performed on a 1-year time horizon and used a government (public health) or health system perspective. Data for selected studies was mainly collected from randomized clinical trials, published literature, pharmaceutical companies, and registry data. Only direct costs were reported in the studies. Sensitivity analyses were stated in almost all studies. However, studies conducted in high-income countries reported sensitivity analyses more elaborately than those performed in low- and middle-income countries. In many published articles related to the budget impact analyses of heart failure treatment, addition of new treatments to the health system's formularies can lead to a reduction in cardiovascular hospitalization rates, re-hospitalization rates, cardiac-associated mortality rates, and an improvement in heart failure class, which can decrease the costs of hospitalizations, specified care visits, primary care visits, and other related treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":12950,"journal":{"name":"Heart Failure Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Failure Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-024-10397-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Heart failure (HF) is increasing globally and turning out to be a serious worldwide public health problem with significant morbidity and mortality. This study aims to systemically review the budget impact analysis of heart failure treatments on health care expenditure worldwide. Scientific databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched for budget impact analysis and heart failure treatments, over January 2001 to August 2023. The quality assessment of the selected studies was evaluated through ISPOR practice guideline. Nineteen studies were included in this systematic review. Based on ISPOR recommendations, most studies were performed on a 1-year time horizon and used a government (public health) or health system perspective. Data for selected studies was mainly collected from randomized clinical trials, published literature, pharmaceutical companies, and registry data. Only direct costs were reported in the studies. Sensitivity analyses were stated in almost all studies. However, studies conducted in high-income countries reported sensitivity analyses more elaborately than those performed in low- and middle-income countries. In many published articles related to the budget impact analyses of heart failure treatment, addition of new treatments to the health system's formularies can lead to a reduction in cardiovascular hospitalization rates, re-hospitalization rates, cardiac-associated mortality rates, and an improvement in heart failure class, which can decrease the costs of hospitalizations, specified care visits, primary care visits, and other related treatments.

Abstract Image

治疗心力衰竭的预算影响分析。系统回顾。
心力衰竭(HF)的发病率和死亡率在全球范围内不断上升,已成为一个严重的世界性公共卫生问题。本研究旨在系统回顾心力衰竭治疗对全球医疗支出的预算影响分析。研究人员在 PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus 和 Google Scholar 等科学数据库中搜索了 2001 年 1 月至 2023 年 8 月期间有关预算影响分析和心衰治疗的内容。通过 ISPOR 实践指南对所选研究进行了质量评估。本系统综述共纳入 19 项研究。根据 ISPOR 的建议,大多数研究的时间跨度为 1 年,并采用了政府(公共卫生)或卫生系统的视角。所选研究的数据主要来自随机临床试验、公开发表的文献、制药公司和登记数据。这些研究只报告了直接成本。几乎所有研究都进行了敏感性分析。不过,与中低收入国家的研究相比,高收入国家的研究对敏感性分析的报告更为详尽。在许多已发表的有关心力衰竭治疗预算影响分析的文章中,将新疗法添加到医疗系统的处方中可降低心血管疾病的住院率、再住院率、心脏相关死亡率,并改善心力衰竭的分级,从而降低住院、特定护理就诊、初级护理就诊和其他相关治疗的费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heart Failure Reviews
Heart Failure Reviews 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
2.20%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Heart Failure Reviews is an international journal which develops links between basic scientists and clinical investigators, creating a unique, interdisciplinary dialogue focused on heart failure, its pathogenesis and treatment. The journal accordingly publishes papers in both basic and clinical research fields. Topics covered include clinical and surgical approaches to therapy, basic pharmacology, biochemistry, molecular biology, pathology, and electrophysiology. The reviews are comprehensive, expanding the reader''s knowledge base and awareness of current research and new findings in this rapidly growing field of cardiovascular medicine. All reviews are thoroughly peer-reviewed before publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信