Effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions in pregnant women attending primary care: a scoping review.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
BJGP Open Pub Date : 2024-10-29 Print Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0185
Niamh Connolly, Dervla Kelly, Patrick O'Donnell, Sarah Hyde
{"title":"Effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions in pregnant women attending primary care: a scoping review.","authors":"Niamh Connolly, Dervla Kelly, Patrick O'Donnell, Sarah Hyde","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Smoking during pregnancy has many adverse effects for infant and mother. Despite this, many pregnant women continue smoking. Primary care is a suitable area to provide smoking cessation interventions.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate available literature regarding effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions for pregnant women in primary care, the factors contributing to this effectiveness, and to provide suggestions for future research.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Systematic scoping literature review.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The methodology followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension for scoping reviews. Five electronic databases were searched. Inclusion criteria included original research studies and studies published in English. Data were extracted using a modified Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) data-charting tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial search yielded 878 articles. Following article screening, 12 studies were included. Five studies found a statistically significant increase in smoking cessation rates or reduction in tobacco consumed in the intervention group. The remaining studies showed no significant difference between the groups. However, 10 studies showed the control group received usual antenatal care involving smoking cessation promotion. An increase in smoking cessation rates was seen in intervention and control groups, demonstrating the effectiveness of these interventions. Interventions included education, counselling, self-help, and financial incentives. They were delivered by GPs, midwives, counsellors, and pregnancy advisers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Primary care is suitable to offer smoking cessation interventions to pregnant women, as it is often the first point of care and more easily accessible than secondary care. Future research is needed to determine the most effective types of interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11523498/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Smoking during pregnancy has many adverse effects for infant and mother. Despite this, many pregnant women continue smoking. Primary care is a suitable area to provide smoking cessation interventions.

Aim: To investigate available literature regarding effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions for pregnant women in primary care, the factors contributing to this effectiveness, and to provide suggestions for future research.

Design & setting: Systematic scoping literature review.

Method: The methodology followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension for scoping reviews. Five electronic databases were searched. Inclusion criteria included original research studies and studies published in English. Data were extracted using a modified Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) data-charting tool.

Results: The initial search yielded 878 articles. Following article screening, 12 studies were included. Five studies found a statistically significant increase in smoking cessation rates or reduction in tobacco consumed in the intervention group. The remaining studies showed no significant difference between the groups. However, 10 studies showed the control group received usual antenatal care involving smoking cessation promotion. An increase in smoking cessation rates was seen in intervention and control groups, demonstrating the effectiveness of these interventions. Interventions included education, counselling, self-help, and financial incentives. They were delivered by GPs, midwives, counsellors, and pregnancy advisers.

Conclusion: Primary care is suitable to offer smoking cessation interventions to pregnant women, as it is often the first point of care and more easily accessible than secondary care. Future research is needed to determine the most effective types of interventions.

对接受初级保健的孕妇进行戒烟干预的范围界定审查。
背景:怀孕期间吸烟会对婴儿和母亲产生许多不利影响。尽管如此,许多孕妇仍在继续吸烟。目的:调查现有文献中有关在初级保健中对孕妇进行戒烟干预的有效性、导致这种有效性的因素,并为今后的研究提供建议:系统范围文献综述:方法:按照PRISMA(系统性综述和Meta分析的首选报告项目)对范围界定综述进行扩展。检索了五个电子数据库。纳入标准包括原创性研究和以英语发表的研究。使用约翰娜-布里格斯研究所(Johanna Briggs Institute)改良的数据图表工具提取数据:结果:初步检索共获得 878 篇文章。经过文章筛选,共纳入了 12 项研究。其中五项研究发现,干预组的戒烟率或烟草消耗量有明显增加。其余研究显示干预组之间没有明显差异。然而,有 10 项研究显示,对照组接受了常规产前护理,其中包括戒烟宣传。干预组和对照组的戒烟率都有所上升,这表明了这些干预措施的有效性。干预措施包括教育、咨询、自助和经济激励。干预措施由全科医生、助产士、咨询师和怀孕顾问提供:结论:基层医疗机构适合为孕妇提供戒烟干预,因为基层医疗机构往往是第一医疗点,而且比二级医疗机构更容易获得服务。未来需要开展研究,以确定最有效的干预类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信