Freesurfer Software Update Significantly Impacts Striatal Volumes in the Huntington's Disease Young Adult Study and Will Influence HD-ISS Staging.

IF 2.1 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Harry Knights, Annabelle Coleman, Nicola Z Hobbs, Sarah J Tabrizi, Rachael I Scahill
{"title":"Freesurfer Software Update Significantly Impacts Striatal Volumes in the Huntington's Disease Young Adult Study and Will Influence HD-ISS Staging.","authors":"Harry Knights, Annabelle Coleman, Nicola Z Hobbs, Sarah J Tabrizi, Rachael I Scahill","doi":"10.3233/JHD-231512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Huntington's Disease Integrated Staging System (HD-ISS) defined disease onset using volumetric cut-offs for caudate and putamen derived from FreeSurfer 6 (FS6). The impact of the latest software update (FS7) on volumes remains unknown. The Huntington's Disease Young Adult Study (HD-YAS) is appropriately positioned to explore differences in FS bias when detecting early atrophy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Explore the relationships and differences between raw caudate and putamen volumes, calculated total intracranial volumes (cTICV), and adjusted caudate and putamen volumes, derived from FS6 and FS7, in HD-YAS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Images from 123 participants were segmented and quality controlled. Relationships and differences between volumes were explored using intraclass correlation (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across the whole cohort, ICC for raw caudate and putamen was 0.99, cTICV 0.93, adjusted caudate 0.87, and adjusted putamen 0.86 (all p < 0.0005). Compared to FS6, FS7 calculated: i) larger raw caudate (+0.8%, p < 0.00005) and putamen (+1.9%, p < 0.00005), with greater difference for larger volumes; and ii) smaller cTICV (-5.1%, p < 0.00005), with greater difference for smaller volumes. The systematic and proportional difference in cTICV was greater than raw volumes. When raw volumes were adjusted for cTICV, these effects compounded (adjusted caudate +7.0%, p < 0.00005; adjusted putamen +8.2%, p < 0.00005), with greater difference for larger volumes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As new software is released, it is critical that biases are explored since differences have the potential to significantly alter the findings of HD trials. Until conversion factors are defined, the HD-ISS must be applied using FS6. This should be incorporated into the HD-ISS online calculator.</p>","PeriodicalId":16042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Huntington's disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Huntington's disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/JHD-231512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Huntington's Disease Integrated Staging System (HD-ISS) defined disease onset using volumetric cut-offs for caudate and putamen derived from FreeSurfer 6 (FS6). The impact of the latest software update (FS7) on volumes remains unknown. The Huntington's Disease Young Adult Study (HD-YAS) is appropriately positioned to explore differences in FS bias when detecting early atrophy.

Objective: Explore the relationships and differences between raw caudate and putamen volumes, calculated total intracranial volumes (cTICV), and adjusted caudate and putamen volumes, derived from FS6 and FS7, in HD-YAS.

Methods: Images from 123 participants were segmented and quality controlled. Relationships and differences between volumes were explored using intraclass correlation (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis.

Results: Across the whole cohort, ICC for raw caudate and putamen was 0.99, cTICV 0.93, adjusted caudate 0.87, and adjusted putamen 0.86 (all p < 0.0005). Compared to FS6, FS7 calculated: i) larger raw caudate (+0.8%, p < 0.00005) and putamen (+1.9%, p < 0.00005), with greater difference for larger volumes; and ii) smaller cTICV (-5.1%, p < 0.00005), with greater difference for smaller volumes. The systematic and proportional difference in cTICV was greater than raw volumes. When raw volumes were adjusted for cTICV, these effects compounded (adjusted caudate +7.0%, p < 0.00005; adjusted putamen +8.2%, p < 0.00005), with greater difference for larger volumes.

Conclusions: As new software is released, it is critical that biases are explored since differences have the potential to significantly alter the findings of HD trials. Until conversion factors are defined, the HD-ISS must be applied using FS6. This should be incorporated into the HD-ISS online calculator.

Freesurfer 软件更新显著影响亨廷顿氏病青年研究中的纹状体体积,并将影响 HD-ISS 分期。
背景:亨廷顿氏病综合分期系统(HD-ISS)使用Freesurfer 6(FS6)得出的尾状体和普鲁士脑的体积截断值来定义疾病的发病。最新的软件更新(FS7)对体积的影响尚不清楚。亨廷顿氏病青年研究(HD-YAS)是探索FS在检测早期萎缩时的偏差差异的合适位置:探索 HD-YAS 所得 FS6 和 FS7 的原始尾状体和普鲁曼体积、计算的颅内总体积(cTICV)以及调整后的尾状体和普鲁曼体积之间的关系和差异:对 123 名参与者的图像进行分割和质量控制。采用类内相关(ICC)和布兰-阿尔特曼(Bland-Altman)分析法探讨体积之间的关系和差异:在整个组群中,原始尾状体和普鲁曼的 ICC 为 0.99,cTICV 为 0.93,调整后的尾状体为 0.87,调整后的普鲁曼为 0.86(均 p < 0.00005)。与 FS6 相比,FS7 计算出:i)更大的原始尾状核(+0.8%,p < 0.00005)和普萘(+1.9%,p < 0.00005),体积越大差异越大;ii)更小的 cTICV(-5.1%,p < 0.00005),体积越小差异越大。cTICV 的系统性和比例性差异大于原始体积。当根据 cTICV 调整原始体积时,这些影响会加剧(调整后尾状核 +7.0%,p < 0.00005;调整后普鲁卡因 +8.2%,p < 0.00005),体积越大,差异越大:结论:随着新软件的发布,探讨偏差至关重要,因为差异有可能显著改变 HD 试验的结果。在确定转换系数之前,必须使用 FS6 来应用 HD-ISS。这一点应纳入 HD-ISS 在线计算器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.70%
发文量
60
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信