Potential efficacy of T and B lymphocyte-targeted therapies on articular involvement of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and systemic sclerosis overlap syndrome. Results from a 2-centre series of 19 cases.

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Nans Lebel, Isabelle Marie, Julien Grosjean, Pauline Brevet, Mathilde Leclercq, Anaël Dumont, Hervé Levesque, Ygal Benhamou, Christian Marcelli, Thierry Lequerre, Olivier Vittecoq
{"title":"Potential efficacy of T and B lymphocyte-targeted therapies on articular involvement of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and systemic sclerosis overlap syndrome. Results from a 2-centre series of 19 cases.","authors":"Nans Lebel, Isabelle Marie, Julien Grosjean, Pauline Brevet, Mathilde Leclercq, Anaël Dumont, Hervé Levesque, Ygal Benhamou, Christian Marcelli, Thierry Lequerre, Olivier Vittecoq","doi":"10.55563/clinexprheumatol/0znf7e","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyse in routine practice the efficacy of targeted therapies on joint involvement of patients with rheumatoid arthritis/systemic sclerosis (RA/SSc) overlap syndrome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective analysis of medical records of two academic centres over a 10-year period. Joint response to targeted therapies was measured according to EULAR criteria based on Disease Activity Score (DAS)-28. In addition, changes in CRP level and glucocorticoid consumption were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen patients were included. Methotrexate (n=11) and hydroxychloroquine (n=4) were the most used first-line treatments. Targeted therapies were frequently used (n=14). Tocilizumab was the most selected therapy (n=8), then rituximab (n=5), abatacept and anti-tumour necrosis factor (n=4). Twenty-one treatment sequences were assessed, including 18 with EULAR response criteria. Responses were \"good\" or \"moderate\" in 100% (4/4) of patients treated with abatacept, 80% (4/5) with rituximab, 40% (2/5) with tocilizumab, and 25% (1/4) with anti-TNF. T and B lymphocyte-targeted therapies (abatacept, rituximab) resulted more frequently in a \"good\" or \"moderate\" response compared to cytokine inhibitors (tocilizumab, etanercept, infliximab) with a significant decrease in DAS-28 at 6 months (-1.75; p=0.016) and a trend to a lower consumption of glucocorticoids.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with RA/SSc overlap syndrome refractory to conventional synthetic-DMARDs, T and B lymphocyte-targeted therapies seem to be a promising therapeutic option to control joint activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":10274,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/0znf7e","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To analyse in routine practice the efficacy of targeted therapies on joint involvement of patients with rheumatoid arthritis/systemic sclerosis (RA/SSc) overlap syndrome.

Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of medical records of two academic centres over a 10-year period. Joint response to targeted therapies was measured according to EULAR criteria based on Disease Activity Score (DAS)-28. In addition, changes in CRP level and glucocorticoid consumption were recorded.

Results: Nineteen patients were included. Methotrexate (n=11) and hydroxychloroquine (n=4) were the most used first-line treatments. Targeted therapies were frequently used (n=14). Tocilizumab was the most selected therapy (n=8), then rituximab (n=5), abatacept and anti-tumour necrosis factor (n=4). Twenty-one treatment sequences were assessed, including 18 with EULAR response criteria. Responses were "good" or "moderate" in 100% (4/4) of patients treated with abatacept, 80% (4/5) with rituximab, 40% (2/5) with tocilizumab, and 25% (1/4) with anti-TNF. T and B lymphocyte-targeted therapies (abatacept, rituximab) resulted more frequently in a "good" or "moderate" response compared to cytokine inhibitors (tocilizumab, etanercept, infliximab) with a significant decrease in DAS-28 at 6 months (-1.75; p=0.016) and a trend to a lower consumption of glucocorticoids.

Conclusions: In patients with RA/SSc overlap syndrome refractory to conventional synthetic-DMARDs, T and B lymphocyte-targeted therapies seem to be a promising therapeutic option to control joint activity.

T和B淋巴细胞靶向疗法对类风湿性关节炎和系统性硬化症重叠综合征患者关节受累的潜在疗效。来自两个中心 22 例病例的系列研究结果。
目的分析常规靶向疗法对类风湿性关节炎/系统性硬化症(RA/SSC)重叠综合征患者关节受累的疗效:这是一项对两个学术中心10年来的医疗记录进行的回顾性分析。根据EULAR标准,以疾病活动度评分(DAS)-28为基础,衡量关节对靶向疗法的反应。此外,还记录了CRP水平和糖皮质激素用量的变化:结果:共纳入19名患者。甲氨蝶呤(11 例)和羟氯喹(4 例)是最常用的一线治疗方法。靶向疗法也经常使用(14 人)。选择最多的疗法是托珠单抗(8例),然后是利妥昔单抗(5例)、阿帕赛普和抗肿瘤坏死因子(4例)。共评估了21种治疗序列,其中18种符合EULAR反应标准。在接受阿巴他赛治疗的患者中,100%(4/4)的反应为 "良好 "或 "中等",80%(4/5)的患者接受了利妥昔单抗治疗,40%(2/5)的患者接受了托珠单抗治疗,25%(1/4)的患者接受了抗肿瘤坏死因子治疗。与细胞因子抑制剂(妥西珠单抗、依那西普、英夫利昔单抗)相比,T淋巴细胞和B淋巴细胞靶向疗法(阿巴他赛普、利妥昔单抗)更常导致 "良好 "或 "中度 "反应,6个月时DAS-28显著下降(-1.75;P=0.016),糖皮质激素用量呈下降趋势:结论:对于传统合成DMARDs难治的RA/SSC重叠综合征患者,T淋巴细胞和B淋巴细胞靶向疗法似乎是一种很有前景的控制关节活动的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
18.90%
发文量
377
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology is a bi-monthly international peer-reviewed journal which has been covering all clinical, experimental and translational aspects of musculoskeletal, arthritic and connective tissue diseases since 1983.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信