Design and Implementation of a Didactic Curriculum in a Large Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine Fellowship Program: A Single-Center Experience.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
American journal of perinatology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-15 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1782599
Shanmukha Mukthapuram, Beth Ann Johnson, Cara Slagle, John Erickson, Beena D Kamath-Rayne, Jennifer M Brady
{"title":"Design and Implementation of a Didactic Curriculum in a Large Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine Fellowship Program: A Single-Center Experience.","authors":"Shanmukha Mukthapuram, Beth Ann Johnson, Cara Slagle, John Erickson, Beena D Kamath-Rayne, Jennifer M Brady","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1782599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> Although the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) provide regulations and guidance on fellowship didactic education, each program establishes their own didactic schedules to address these learning needs. Wide variation exists in content, educators, amount of protected educational time, and the format for didactic lectures. This inconsistency can contribute to fellow dissatisfaction, a perceived poor learning experience, and poor attendance. Our objective was to create a Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine (NPM) fellow curriculum based on adult learning theory utilizing fellow input to improve the perceived fellow experience.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> A needs assessment of current NPM fellows at Cincinnati Children's Hospital was conducted to guide the development of a new curriculum. Fellow perception of educational experience and board preparedness before and after introduction of the new curriculum was collected. Study period was from October 2018 to July 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> One hundred percent of the fellows responded to the needs assessment survey. A response rate of 100 and 87.5% were noted on mid-curriculum survey and postcurriculum survey, respectively. Key themes identified and incorporated into the curriculum included schedule structure, content, and delivery mode. A new didactic curriculum implementing a consistent schedule of shorter lectures grouped by organ system targeting ABP core content was created. After curriculum implementation, fellows had higher self-perception of board preparedness, and overall improved satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Our positive experience in implementing this curriculum provides a framework for individual programs to implement similar curricula, and could be utilized to aid in development of national NPM curricula.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· Fellowship didactic education varies significantly resulting in learner dissatisfaction and poor attendance.. · Widespread need to restructure didactic curricula exists.. · Our study provides a framework for future curricula..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":"1874-1879"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1782599","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective:  Although the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) provide regulations and guidance on fellowship didactic education, each program establishes their own didactic schedules to address these learning needs. Wide variation exists in content, educators, amount of protected educational time, and the format for didactic lectures. This inconsistency can contribute to fellow dissatisfaction, a perceived poor learning experience, and poor attendance. Our objective was to create a Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine (NPM) fellow curriculum based on adult learning theory utilizing fellow input to improve the perceived fellow experience.

Study design:  A needs assessment of current NPM fellows at Cincinnati Children's Hospital was conducted to guide the development of a new curriculum. Fellow perception of educational experience and board preparedness before and after introduction of the new curriculum was collected. Study period was from October 2018 to July 2021.

Results:  One hundred percent of the fellows responded to the needs assessment survey. A response rate of 100 and 87.5% were noted on mid-curriculum survey and postcurriculum survey, respectively. Key themes identified and incorporated into the curriculum included schedule structure, content, and delivery mode. A new didactic curriculum implementing a consistent schedule of shorter lectures grouped by organ system targeting ABP core content was created. After curriculum implementation, fellows had higher self-perception of board preparedness, and overall improved satisfaction.

Conclusion:  Our positive experience in implementing this curriculum provides a framework for individual programs to implement similar curricula, and could be utilized to aid in development of national NPM curricula.

Key points: · Fellowship didactic education varies significantly resulting in learner dissatisfaction and poor attendance.. · Widespread need to restructure didactic curricula exists.. · Our study provides a framework for future curricula..

大型新生儿-围产期医学研究员项目中教学课程的设计与实施:单中心经验。
目的:尽管毕业医学教育认证委员会(Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education)和美国儿科学委员会(American Board of Pediatrics, ABP)对研究员的授课教育做出了规定和指导,但每个项目都制定了自己的授课计划,以满足这些学习需求。在教学内容、教育者、受保护的教育时间以及授课形式等方面存在很大差异。这种不一致性可能会导致学员不满、认为学习体验不佳以及出勤率低。我们的目标是以成人学习理论为基础,利用研究人员的意见创建新生儿-围产期医学(NPM)研究人员课程,以改善研究人员的感知体验:研究设计:我们对辛辛那提儿童医院目前的新生儿-围产期医学研究员进行了需求评估,以指导新课程的开发。在引入新课程前后,收集了研究员对教育经验和董事会准备情况的看法。研究时间为 2018 年 10 月至 2021 年 7 月:100%的研究员对需求评估调查做出了回应。课程中期调查和课程后期调查的回复率分别为 100% 和 87.5%。已确定并纳入课程的关键主题包括课程表结构、内容和授课模式。针对 ABP 核心内容,创建了新的教学课程,实施了按器官系统分组的一致的较短讲座时间表。课程实施后,研究员对董事会准备情况有了更高的自我认知,总体满意度也有所提高:我们在实施该课程方面的积极经验为各个项目实施类似课程提供了一个框架,并可用于帮助制定国家国家预防医学课程:- 研究员的教学教育差异很大,导致学员不满意和出勤率低。- 广泛存在重组教学课程的需求。- 我们的研究为未来的课程提供了一个框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信