Personalizing rehabilitation for individuals with musculoskeletal impairments: Feasibility of implementation of the Measures Associated to Prognostic (MAPS) tool.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-15 DOI:10.1080/09593985.2024.2329960
Nathalie Desmarais, Simon Décary, Catherine Houle, Christian Longtin, Thomas Gerard, Kadija Perreault, Emilie Lagueux, Pascal Tétreault, Marc-André Blanchette, Hélène Beaudry, Yannick Tousignant-Laflamme
{"title":"Personalizing rehabilitation for individuals with musculoskeletal impairments: Feasibility of implementation of the Measures Associated to Prognostic (MAPS) tool.","authors":"Nathalie Desmarais, Simon Décary, Catherine Houle, Christian Longtin, Thomas Gerard, Kadija Perreault, Emilie Lagueux, Pascal Tétreault, Marc-André Blanchette, Hélène Beaudry, Yannick Tousignant-Laflamme","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2024.2329960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The <b>M</b>easures <b>A</b>ssociated to <b>P</b>rogno<b>S</b>tic (MAPS) tool is a standardized questionnaire that integrates validated prognostic tools to detect the presence of biopsychosocial prognostic factors in patients consulting for musculoskeletal disorders.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objectives were to assess the: 1) feasibility of implementation of the MAPS tool, 2) clinicians' acceptability of the dashboard, and 3) patients' acceptability of the MAPS tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty physiotherapists and two occupational therapists from seven outpatient musculoskeletal clinics were recruited to implement the MAPS tool during a 3-month timeframe, where new patients completed the questionnaire upon initial assessment. The results were presented to the clinicians via a dashboard. Surveys and semi-structured interviews were conducted to measure feasibility and acceptability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six out of 11 feasibility criteria (55%) and 21 out of 24 acceptability criteria (88%) reached the a priori threshold for success. The interviews allowed us to identify three main themes to facilitate implementation: 1) limiting the burden, 2) ensuring patients' understanding of the tool's purpose, and 3) integrating the dashboard as a clinical information tool.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our quantitative and qualitative results support the feasibility of implementation and acceptability of the MAPS tool pending minor adjustments. Depicting the patients' prognostic profile has the potential to help clinicians optimize their interventions for patients presenting with musculoskeletal disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"420-431"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2024.2329960","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Measures Associated to PrognoStic (MAPS) tool is a standardized questionnaire that integrates validated prognostic tools to detect the presence of biopsychosocial prognostic factors in patients consulting for musculoskeletal disorders.

Purpose: The objectives were to assess the: 1) feasibility of implementation of the MAPS tool, 2) clinicians' acceptability of the dashboard, and 3) patients' acceptability of the MAPS tool.

Methods: Twenty physiotherapists and two occupational therapists from seven outpatient musculoskeletal clinics were recruited to implement the MAPS tool during a 3-month timeframe, where new patients completed the questionnaire upon initial assessment. The results were presented to the clinicians via a dashboard. Surveys and semi-structured interviews were conducted to measure feasibility and acceptability.

Results: Six out of 11 feasibility criteria (55%) and 21 out of 24 acceptability criteria (88%) reached the a priori threshold for success. The interviews allowed us to identify three main themes to facilitate implementation: 1) limiting the burden, 2) ensuring patients' understanding of the tool's purpose, and 3) integrating the dashboard as a clinical information tool.

Conclusion: Our quantitative and qualitative results support the feasibility of implementation and acceptability of the MAPS tool pending minor adjustments. Depicting the patients' prognostic profile has the potential to help clinicians optimize their interventions for patients presenting with musculoskeletal disorders.

为肌肉骨骼损伤患者提供个性化康复服务:实施预后相关措施(MAPS)工具的可行性。
简介预后相关措施(MAPS)工具是一种标准化问卷,它整合了经过验证的预后工具,用于检测肌肉骨骼疾病就诊患者是否存在生物心理社会预后因素:1)实施 MAPS 工具的可行性;2)临床医生对仪表板的接受程度;3)患者对 MAPS 工具的接受程度:方法:从 7 家肌肉骨骼门诊诊所招募了 20 名物理治疗师和 2 名职业治疗师,在 3 个月的时间内实施 MAPS 工具,新患者在初次评估时填写问卷。调查结果将通过仪表板呈现给临床医生。为了衡量可行性和可接受性,还进行了调查和半结构化访谈:结果:11 项可行性标准中的 6 项(55%)和 24 项可接受性标准中的 21 项(88%)达到了成功的先验阈值。通过访谈,我们确定了促进实施的三大主题:1) 减轻负担;2) 确保患者理解工具的目的;3) 将仪表板整合为临床信息工具:我们的定量和定性结果支持 MAPS 工具的实施可行性和可接受性,只需稍作调整即可。描述患者的预后情况有望帮助临床医生优化对肌肉骨骼疾病患者的干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信