Four Notes on Six Conversations

IF 0.8 3区 艺术学 0 THEATER
Carla Neuss
{"title":"Four Notes on Six Conversations","authors":"Carla Neuss","doi":"10.1353/tj.2023.a922315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Four Notes on Six Conversations <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Carla Neuss (bio) </li> </ul> <p>In June 2023, I had the unexpected privilege of being able to sit down, in person, with six scholars in our field for a series of open-ended and wide-ranging conversations. The occasion was, nominally, a chance to reflect on the seventy-five years of <em>Theatre Journal’s</em> contribution to theatre scholarship; but over the course of my conversations with Rustom Bharucha, Jean Graham-Jones, Joseph Roach, Karen Shimakawa, Patricia Ybarra, and Harvey Young, what emerged was a multi-valenced probing of the past, present, and future of what has come to be known as theatre and performance studies. As a recently minted PhD, I was conscious of proverbially sitting at the feet of intellectual giants in our field and had planned on dutifully asking a series of pre-prepared questions: What has your experience with <em>Theatre Journal</em> been? What do you see as the role of scholarly journals today? What are your hopes for the next seventy-five years of the journal? As in only but the richest of conversations, what resulted exceeded the narrow bounds of such questions and I found myself sharing ideas, concerns, and hopes with my interlocutors that ran the gamut from redefining diversity to the collapse of public universities, the sidelining of theatre history to the tensions between scholarship and practice.</p> <p>My task since that June has been to distill the knowledges generated from these conversations in order to share them with <em>TJ</em> readers and the field at large. To that end, I have produced a series of short videos drawn from these interviews (which I had the good fortune to be able to record) as well as publishing the transcripts of our conversations in hopes of building an archive of reflections on the state of the field that can serve scholars in years to come. In this short essay, I cannot do justice to the richness of this archive. What I can do, though, is distill the threads of conversation into four key considerations, each of which continues to linger with me. I hope by sharing these notes with you we can collectively consider—and create—what the next seventy-five years of the discourse on theatre and performance will be and the form it will take.</p> <ol> <li> <p>1. Dwindling, if not gone, are the days of receiving a journal like <em>TJ</em> in the mail, sitting down with a beverage of choice, and reading it cover to cover. Harvey Young suspects that perhaps only Ric Knowles still enacts that ritual of reading that was once dominant. For me, as a scholar raised in the keyword generation, reading a journal in its entirety has gone the way of listening to an entire album; instead, I usually just stream the hit single from Spotify (in this case, JSTOR or ProjectMuse.) A sense of loss surrounding this shift underpinned these conversations. What do we lose when we <strong>[End Page E-67]</strong> consume scholarship outside of its curatorial context? But in other ways, we have all benefited from the search-enginization of encountering scholarship, in no small part because we are now more likely, through algorithms and keywords, to encounter work from fields beyond our own; my own current book project’s central case studies were the results of erroneous hits on JSTOR that caught my eye and attracted my curiosity. My interlocutors also spoke to the need and desire for academic publishing to move to more open-access models. That shift, already underway with some publications (facilitated by moves like JSTOR’s free access to one hundred articles monthly for all registered users) holds the potential of lifting the paywall curtain that often keeps valuable work out of the hands of readers beyond the academy. Perhaps much more of the scholarship in our field would function as public-facing if the public could in fact access it.</p> </li> <li> <p>2. Many of the interviewees spoke to the question of diversity in unexpected ways. Yes, several praised the progress made by <em>Theatre Journal</em> and its peer journals in widening the range of voices and contributors to the journal; Patricia Ybarra wryly recalled a special issue on Women in Drama published in...</p> </li> </ol> </p>","PeriodicalId":46247,"journal":{"name":"THEATRE JOURNAL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THEATRE JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tj.2023.a922315","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • Four Notes on Six Conversations
  • Carla Neuss (bio)

In June 2023, I had the unexpected privilege of being able to sit down, in person, with six scholars in our field for a series of open-ended and wide-ranging conversations. The occasion was, nominally, a chance to reflect on the seventy-five years of Theatre Journal’s contribution to theatre scholarship; but over the course of my conversations with Rustom Bharucha, Jean Graham-Jones, Joseph Roach, Karen Shimakawa, Patricia Ybarra, and Harvey Young, what emerged was a multi-valenced probing of the past, present, and future of what has come to be known as theatre and performance studies. As a recently minted PhD, I was conscious of proverbially sitting at the feet of intellectual giants in our field and had planned on dutifully asking a series of pre-prepared questions: What has your experience with Theatre Journal been? What do you see as the role of scholarly journals today? What are your hopes for the next seventy-five years of the journal? As in only but the richest of conversations, what resulted exceeded the narrow bounds of such questions and I found myself sharing ideas, concerns, and hopes with my interlocutors that ran the gamut from redefining diversity to the collapse of public universities, the sidelining of theatre history to the tensions between scholarship and practice.

My task since that June has been to distill the knowledges generated from these conversations in order to share them with TJ readers and the field at large. To that end, I have produced a series of short videos drawn from these interviews (which I had the good fortune to be able to record) as well as publishing the transcripts of our conversations in hopes of building an archive of reflections on the state of the field that can serve scholars in years to come. In this short essay, I cannot do justice to the richness of this archive. What I can do, though, is distill the threads of conversation into four key considerations, each of which continues to linger with me. I hope by sharing these notes with you we can collectively consider—and create—what the next seventy-five years of the discourse on theatre and performance will be and the form it will take.

  1. 1. Dwindling, if not gone, are the days of receiving a journal like TJ in the mail, sitting down with a beverage of choice, and reading it cover to cover. Harvey Young suspects that perhaps only Ric Knowles still enacts that ritual of reading that was once dominant. For me, as a scholar raised in the keyword generation, reading a journal in its entirety has gone the way of listening to an entire album; instead, I usually just stream the hit single from Spotify (in this case, JSTOR or ProjectMuse.) A sense of loss surrounding this shift underpinned these conversations. What do we lose when we [End Page E-67] consume scholarship outside of its curatorial context? But in other ways, we have all benefited from the search-enginization of encountering scholarship, in no small part because we are now more likely, through algorithms and keywords, to encounter work from fields beyond our own; my own current book project’s central case studies were the results of erroneous hits on JSTOR that caught my eye and attracted my curiosity. My interlocutors also spoke to the need and desire for academic publishing to move to more open-access models. That shift, already underway with some publications (facilitated by moves like JSTOR’s free access to one hundred articles monthly for all registered users) holds the potential of lifting the paywall curtain that often keeps valuable work out of the hands of readers beyond the academy. Perhaps much more of the scholarship in our field would function as public-facing if the public could in fact access it.

  2. 2. Many of the interviewees spoke to the question of diversity in unexpected ways. Yes, several praised the progress made by Theatre Journal and its peer journals in widening the range of voices and contributors to the journal; Patricia Ybarra wryly recalled a special issue on Women in Drama published in...

六次对话的四篇笔记
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: 六次谈话的四篇笔记 卡拉-诺伊斯(简历 2023 年 6 月,我意外地荣幸地与我们领域的六位学者当面坐下来,进行了一系列开放而广泛的谈话。名义上,这是一次反思《戏剧杂志》七十五年来对戏剧学术贡献的机会;但在我与拉ustom Bharucha、Jean Graham-Jones、Joseph Roach、Karen Shimakawa、Patricia Ybarra 和 Harvey Young 的谈话过程中,出现的是对戏剧和表演研究的过去、现在和未来的多角度探究。作为一名新近毕业的博士,我意识到自己正坐在本领域知识巨匠的脚下,并计划尽职尽责地提出一系列事先准备好的问题:您在《戏剧杂志》工作的经历如何?您认为当今学术期刊的作用是什么?您对该期刊下一个七十五年有何期许?我发现自己与对话者分享的想法、关注的问题和希望涵盖了从重新定义多样性到公立大学的崩溃、戏剧史的边缘化到学术与实践之间的紧张关系等方方面面。自今年 6 月以来,我的任务一直是提炼这些对话中产生的知识,以便与 TJ 的读者和整个领域分享。为此,我制作了一系列取材于这些访谈的视频短片(我有幸录制了这些视频短片),并出版了我们的谈话记录,希望能建立一个关于该领域现状的反思档案库,在未来的岁月里为学者们服务。在这篇短文中,我无法对这一档案的丰富内容做出公正的评价。不过,我可以做的是将对话的线索提炼为四个关键考虑因素,其中每一个都让我回味无穷。我希望通过与大家分享这些观点,我们能够共同思考--并创造--未来七十五年关于戏剧和表演的讨论将是怎样的,以及它将采取怎样的形式。 1.收到邮寄来的类似《TJ》这样的期刊,坐下来喝上一杯饮料,然后从头到尾读完的日子,即使还没有消失,也已经越来越少了。哈维-扬怀疑,也许只有里克-诺尔斯(Ric Knowles)还在坚持这种曾经占主导地位的阅读仪式。对我来说,作为一名在 "关键词 "时代成长起来的学者,阅读整本期刊就像听一整张专辑一样;相反,我通常只是从Spotify上下载热门单曲(这里指的是JSTOR或ProjectMuse)。当我们[第 E-67 页末]在策展背景之外消费学术成果时,我们会失去什么?但在其他方面,我们都从搜索引擎化的学术研究中获益匪浅,这在很大程度上是因为,通过算法和关键词,我们现在更有可能接触到我们自己领域之外的作品;我自己当前图书项目的核心案例研究就是在 JSTOR 上错误点击的结果,它们吸引了我的眼球,引起了我的好奇心。我的对话者们还谈到了学术出版向更开放获取模式转变的必要性和愿望。一些出版物已经在进行这种转变(JSTOR 每月向所有注册用户免费提供一百篇文章等举措推动了这种转变),这种转变有可能揭开付费墙的帷幕,因为付费墙往往使学术界以外的读者无法接触到有价值的作品。如果公众可以访问我们领域的学术成果,那么也许会有更多的学术成果面向公众。 2.2. 许多受访者以意想不到的方式谈到了多样性问题。帕特里夏-伊巴拉(Patricia Ybarra)诙谐地回顾了《戏剧杂志》及其同行期刊在扩大声音和投稿人范围方面所取得的进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
THEATRE JOURNAL
THEATRE JOURNAL THEATER-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
40.00%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: For over five decades, Theatre Journal"s broad array of scholarly articles and reviews has earned it an international reputation as one of the most authoritative and useful publications of theatre studies available today. Drawing contributions from noted practitioners and scholars, Theatre Journal features social and historical studies, production reviews, and theoretical inquiries that analyze dramatic texts and production.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信