Guest Editor's Introduction: Pain's Plurals and Narrative Disruption: Communicating Pain and Honoring Its Telling

IF 0.2 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE
Sara Wasson
{"title":"Guest Editor's Introduction: Pain's Plurals and Narrative Disruption: Communicating Pain and Honoring Its Telling","authors":"Sara Wasson","doi":"10.1353/lm.2023.a921562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Guest Editor's Introduction:<span>Pain's Plurals and Narrative Disruption: Communicating Pain and Honoring Its Telling</span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Sara Wasson (bio) </li> </ul> <blockquote> <p><span><em>How to narrate an illness</em></span><span><em>in fairer climates and</em></span><span><em>to fair-weather figures</em>.</span></p> <p><span>*</span></p> <p><span><em>How not to</em>.</span></p> —<em>Amy Allara</em><sup>1</sup> </blockquote> <p>Pain may be a wind, a mist, live burial, a rubbish tip, a concrete suit, shattered glass, a knife.<sup>2</sup> Discussions of pain can readily become a list of the vivid metaphors created as people reach for language in extremity.<sup>3</sup> Each of these metaphors—and this entire theme issue—is an example of the way pain generates words: it inspires telling. Yet despite such an abundance of language, a refrain of \"invisibility\" remains disturbingly prevalent in the lived experience of many people with pain, both mental and physical (and indeed pain problematizes that divide in multiple ways). This introduction to this issue will review and contextualize relevant recent debates in the cultural studies of pain. One of my primary aims in curating this issue is to acknowledge that insofar as pain experience poses challenges to representation, that is less a function of any intrinsic unspeakability of pain, and more of a varying cultural <em>legibility</em> of pain. Expectations of illness story—in the sense of both the events and the narrative of those events, the way they are told—has a direct impact on what kinds of pain experience <strong>[End Page 283]</strong> can most readily be heard, and who is heard. Cultural contexts and expectations of illness story influence what can be heard in pain, what can be known about it, and who is respected as knowing. These are matters of epistemic justice.<sup>4</sup></p> <p>Each article in this issue examines writing which brings pain vividly to life, and shows how a particular telling of pain requires unsettling certain conventions of writing or illness expression. While narratology notes the difference between story (events, plot) and narrative (the telling of those events), the essays in this issue are less concerned with precise narratological anatomization of narrative, and more interested in the cultural work done <em>by</em> narratives, by the telling of events within specific forms.<sup>5</sup> Writing pain may require disruptions, textual experimentation and the breaching of cultural expectations of what narratives should do and who should tell them.</p> <p>Pain takes many forms and has many temporalities. In the form of \"chronic\" or persistent pain, for example, it affects over 20 percent of all adults in the US, and for 12 percent of those people the pain severely impacts multiple parts of their life.<sup>6</sup> Global estimations of chronic pain range between 20 percent and 27 percent, with local variations far in excess of this.<sup>7</sup> Chronic pain is defined as pain that lasts for more than six months, and can be as severe as acute pain; it can impact employment, relationships, and even suicide risk; and its prevalence has been severely exacerbated by the legacies of the COVID pandemic and Long COVID.<sup>8</sup> Yet many people who live with chronic pain describe feeling that their suffering is not visible: pain can be \"Unseen. Unequal. Unfair.\"<sup>9</sup> Responding to such crises requires initiatives economic, social, medical, and cultural. This theme issue stems from the need to expand the representational strategies, imagery, and imaginative models available to all those engaged with representations of pain. The essays here explore multiple chronic pains that need to be more visible, including: the legacies of Black, Native American, and First Nations systemic oppression; chronic physical and mental pain which resists recovery or closure and requires more ambiguous labels; gynecological pain and stigma; and grief from child loss.</p> <p>Saying that pain may be invisible is not to say that it intrinsically resists representation. After Elaine Scarry's <em>The Body in Pain</em> (1985), the idea of pain as unrepresentable became something of a critical refrain. In her analysis of the devastation wrought by torture, Scarry says, \"Physical pain does not simply resist language but actively destroys it, bringing about an immediate reversion to a state anterior to language.\"<sup>10</sup> Many critics have challenged Scarry's claim.<sup>11</sup> Hilary <strong>[End Page 284]</strong> Mantel, for example, praises the efficacy of metaphor, the \"devil's vocabulary\" of \"singing aches, of spasms, of strictures and cramps...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":44538,"journal":{"name":"LITERATURE AND MEDICINE","volume":"508 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LITERATURE AND MEDICINE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/lm.2023.a921562","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • Guest Editor's Introduction:Pain's Plurals and Narrative Disruption: Communicating Pain and Honoring Its Telling
  • Sara Wasson (bio)

How to narrate an illnessin fairer climates andto fair-weather figures.

*

How not to.

Amy Allara1

Pain may be a wind, a mist, live burial, a rubbish tip, a concrete suit, shattered glass, a knife.2 Discussions of pain can readily become a list of the vivid metaphors created as people reach for language in extremity.3 Each of these metaphors—and this entire theme issue—is an example of the way pain generates words: it inspires telling. Yet despite such an abundance of language, a refrain of "invisibility" remains disturbingly prevalent in the lived experience of many people with pain, both mental and physical (and indeed pain problematizes that divide in multiple ways). This introduction to this issue will review and contextualize relevant recent debates in the cultural studies of pain. One of my primary aims in curating this issue is to acknowledge that insofar as pain experience poses challenges to representation, that is less a function of any intrinsic unspeakability of pain, and more of a varying cultural legibility of pain. Expectations of illness story—in the sense of both the events and the narrative of those events, the way they are told—has a direct impact on what kinds of pain experience [End Page 283] can most readily be heard, and who is heard. Cultural contexts and expectations of illness story influence what can be heard in pain, what can be known about it, and who is respected as knowing. These are matters of epistemic justice.4

Each article in this issue examines writing which brings pain vividly to life, and shows how a particular telling of pain requires unsettling certain conventions of writing or illness expression. While narratology notes the difference between story (events, plot) and narrative (the telling of those events), the essays in this issue are less concerned with precise narratological anatomization of narrative, and more interested in the cultural work done by narratives, by the telling of events within specific forms.5 Writing pain may require disruptions, textual experimentation and the breaching of cultural expectations of what narratives should do and who should tell them.

Pain takes many forms and has many temporalities. In the form of "chronic" or persistent pain, for example, it affects over 20 percent of all adults in the US, and for 12 percent of those people the pain severely impacts multiple parts of their life.6 Global estimations of chronic pain range between 20 percent and 27 percent, with local variations far in excess of this.7 Chronic pain is defined as pain that lasts for more than six months, and can be as severe as acute pain; it can impact employment, relationships, and even suicide risk; and its prevalence has been severely exacerbated by the legacies of the COVID pandemic and Long COVID.8 Yet many people who live with chronic pain describe feeling that their suffering is not visible: pain can be "Unseen. Unequal. Unfair."9 Responding to such crises requires initiatives economic, social, medical, and cultural. This theme issue stems from the need to expand the representational strategies, imagery, and imaginative models available to all those engaged with representations of pain. The essays here explore multiple chronic pains that need to be more visible, including: the legacies of Black, Native American, and First Nations systemic oppression; chronic physical and mental pain which resists recovery or closure and requires more ambiguous labels; gynecological pain and stigma; and grief from child loss.

Saying that pain may be invisible is not to say that it intrinsically resists representation. After Elaine Scarry's The Body in Pain (1985), the idea of pain as unrepresentable became something of a critical refrain. In her analysis of the devastation wrought by torture, Scarry says, "Physical pain does not simply resist language but actively destroys it, bringing about an immediate reversion to a state anterior to language."10 Many critics have challenged Scarry's claim.11 Hilary [End Page 284] Mantel, for example, praises the efficacy of metaphor, the "devil's vocabulary" of "singing aches, of spasms, of strictures and cramps...

客座编辑导言:疼痛的复数与叙事中断:传达疼痛并尊重疼痛的诉说
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: 特邀编辑导言:疼痛的复数与叙事中断:萨拉-瓦森(Sara Wasson)(简历) 如何在更公平的气候条件下向更公平的人物叙述疾病。* 如何不叙述。-疼痛可能是风、是雾、是活埋、是垃圾堆、是水泥服、是碎玻璃、是刀子。2 人们在讨论疼痛时,很容易就会列举出一系列生动的隐喻,这些隐喻是人们在极度痛苦时创造出来的语言。然而,尽管有如此丰富的语言,"不可见 "的反语仍然令人不安地普遍存在于许多精神和身体疼痛患者的生活经历中(事实上,疼痛以多种方式使这一鸿沟成为问题)。本期导言将回顾疼痛文化研究领域近期的相关争论,并对争论背景进行梳理。我策划本期的主要目的之一是承认,只要疼痛体验对表述构成挑战,这与其说是疼痛内在的不可言说性,不如说是疼痛的文化可读性各不相同。对疾病故事的期望--从事件和对这些事件的叙述、讲述方式的意义上来说--直接影响到什么样的疼痛经历 [完 第 283 页] 最容易被倾听,以及谁会被倾听。文化背景和人们对疾病故事的期望影响着人们可以听到哪些痛苦经历,可以了解哪些痛苦经历,以及谁被尊重为了解痛苦经历的人。4 本期的每篇文章都探讨了如何通过写作将疼痛生动地展现出来,并展示了对疼痛的特定讲述如何需要打破某些写作或疾病表达的惯例。叙事学指出了故事(事件、情节)和叙事(讲述这些事件)之间的区别,而本期的文章则不太关注叙事学对叙事的精确解剖,而是更关注叙事所做的文化工作,即以特定形式讲述事件。疼痛有多种形式和多种时间性。以 "慢性 "或持续性疼痛为例,它影响着美国 20% 以上的成年人,其中 12% 的人的疼痛严重影响了他们生活的多个部分。慢性疼痛的定义是持续 6 个月以上的疼痛,其严重程度可能不亚于急性疼痛;慢性疼痛可能影响就业、人际关系,甚至自杀风险;COVID 大流行和 Long COVID 的遗留问题严重加剧了慢性疼痛的流行。不平等。9 应对此类危机需要在经济、社会、医疗和文化方面采取主动行动。本期主题源于扩大表述策略、图像和想象模式的需要,供所有参与疼痛表述的人使用。这里的文章探讨了需要更多关注的多种慢性疼痛,包括:黑人、美洲原住民和原住民系统性压迫的遗留问题;慢性身体和精神痛苦,这些疼痛抗拒恢复或结束,需要更模糊的标签;妇科疼痛和耻辱;以及失去孩子的悲痛。说疼痛可能是隐形的,并不是说它本质上抗拒表述。在伊莱恩-斯卡瑞(Elaine Scarry)的《疼痛中的身体》(The Body in Pain,1985 年)一书之后,"疼痛是不可表述的 "这一观点成为了批评界的口头禅。在分析酷刑造成的破坏时,斯卡瑞说:"身体的疼痛并不只是抵制语言,而是积极地摧毁语言,使其立即恢复到语言之前的状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Literature and Medicine is a journal devoted to exploring interfaces between literary and medical knowledge and understanding. Issues of illness, health, medical science, violence, and the body are examined through literary and cultural texts. Our readership includes scholars of literature, history, and critical theory, as well as health professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信