Low-carbon embodied alkali-activated materials for sustainable construction: A comparative study of single and ensemble learners

IF 3.6 4区 材料科学 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Muhammad Nasir Amin, Suleman Ayub Khan, Ahmed A. Alawi Al-Naghi, Enamur R. Latifee, Nawaf Alnawmasi, Ahmed Farouk Deifalla
{"title":"Low-carbon embodied alkali-activated materials for sustainable construction: A comparative study of single and ensemble learners","authors":"Muhammad Nasir Amin, Suleman Ayub Khan, Ahmed A. Alawi Al-Naghi, Enamur R. Latifee, Nawaf Alnawmasi, Ahmed Farouk Deifalla","doi":"10.1515/rams-2023-0162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Popular and eco-friendly alkali-activated materials (AAMs) replace Portland cement concrete. Due to the considerable compositional variability of AAMs and the inability of established materials science methods to understand composition–performance relationships, accurate property forecasts have proved impossible. This study set out to develop AAM compressive strength (CS) evaluation machine learning (ML) models using techniques including extreme gradient boosting (XGB), bagging regressor (BR), and multi-layer perceptron neural network (MLPNN). Ten input variables were used with a large dataset of 676 points. Statistical and K-fold studies were also used to evaluate the developed models’ correctness. XGB predicted the CS of AAM the best, followed by BR and MLPNN. The MLPNN and BR models had <jats:italic>R</jats:italic> <jats:sup>2</jats:sup> values of 0.80 and 0.90, respectively, whereas the XGB model had 0.94. Results from statistical analyses and k-fold cross-validation of the used ML models further attest to their validity. The built models can potentially compute the CS of AAMs for a variety of input parameter values, reducing the requirement for costly and time-consuming laboratory testing. Researchers and businesses may find this study useful in determining the necessary quantities of AAMs’ raw components.","PeriodicalId":54484,"journal":{"name":"Reviews on Advanced Materials Science","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews on Advanced Materials Science","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/rams-2023-0162","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Popular and eco-friendly alkali-activated materials (AAMs) replace Portland cement concrete. Due to the considerable compositional variability of AAMs and the inability of established materials science methods to understand composition–performance relationships, accurate property forecasts have proved impossible. This study set out to develop AAM compressive strength (CS) evaluation machine learning (ML) models using techniques including extreme gradient boosting (XGB), bagging regressor (BR), and multi-layer perceptron neural network (MLPNN). Ten input variables were used with a large dataset of 676 points. Statistical and K-fold studies were also used to evaluate the developed models’ correctness. XGB predicted the CS of AAM the best, followed by BR and MLPNN. The MLPNN and BR models had R 2 values of 0.80 and 0.90, respectively, whereas the XGB model had 0.94. Results from statistical analyses and k-fold cross-validation of the used ML models further attest to their validity. The built models can potentially compute the CS of AAMs for a variety of input parameter values, reducing the requirement for costly and time-consuming laboratory testing. Researchers and businesses may find this study useful in determining the necessary quantities of AAMs’ raw components.
用于可持续建筑的低碳含碱活性材料:单一学习者和组合学习者的比较研究
广受欢迎的环保型碱活性材料(AAMs)可替代硅酸盐水泥混凝土。由于碱活性材料的成分变化很大,而且现有的材料科学方法无法理解成分与性能之间的关系,因此无法进行准确的性能预测。本研究利用极端梯度提升(XGB)、袋装回归器(BR)和多层感知器神经网络(MLPNN)等技术开发了 AAM 抗压强度(CS)评估机器学习(ML)模型。使用了十个输入变量和一个包含 676 个点的大型数据集。统计和 K 折研究也用于评估所开发模型的正确性。XGB 对 AAM 的 CS 预测最好,其次是 BR 和 MLPNN。MLPNN 和 BR 模型的 R 2 值分别为 0.80 和 0.90,而 XGB 模型的 R 2 值为 0.94。对所使用的 ML 模型进行统计分析和 k 倍交叉验证的结果进一步证明了这些模型的有效性。所建立的模型可以计算各种输入参数值的 AAM 的 CS 值,从而减少了对成本高、耗时长的实验室测试的要求。研究人员和企业可能会发现本研究有助于确定 AAMs 原始成分的必要数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
43
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Reviews on Advanced Materials Science is a fully peer-reviewed, open access, electronic journal that publishes significant, original and relevant works in the area of theoretical and experimental studies of advanced materials. The journal provides the readers with free, instant, and permanent access to all content worldwide; and the authors with extensive promotion of published articles, long-time preservation, language-correction services, no space constraints and immediate publication. Reviews on Advanced Materials Science is listed inter alia by Clarivate Analytics (formerly Thomson Reuters) - Current Contents/Physical, Chemical, and Earth Sciences (CC/PC&ES), JCR and SCIE. Our standard policy requires each paper to be reviewed by at least two Referees and the peer-review process is single-blind.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信