Objective turning measures improve diagnostic accuracy and relate to real-world mobility/combat readiness in chronic mild traumatic brain injury

Peter Fino, Prokopios Antonellis, Lucy Parrington, Margaret M. Weightman, Leland E. Dibble, Mark E. Lester, Carrie W. Hoppes, Laurie A. King
{"title":"Objective turning measures improve diagnostic accuracy and relate to real-world mobility/combat readiness in chronic mild traumatic brain injury","authors":"Peter Fino, Prokopios Antonellis, Lucy Parrington, Margaret M. Weightman, Leland E. Dibble, Mark E. Lester, Carrie W. Hoppes, Laurie A. King","doi":"10.1101/2024.03.11.24304109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Balance and mobility problems are common consequences after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). However, turning and non-straight locomotion, which are required for daily living, are rarely assessed in clinical tests of function after mTBI. Therefore, the primary goals of this study were to assess 1) the added value of clinic-based turning task variables, obtained using wearable sensors, over standard general assessments of mobility, and 2) assess the associations between general assessments of mobility, objective variables from clinic-based turning tasks, and ecologically-relevant functional tasks. Materials and Methods Fifty-three individuals with mTBI and 57 healthy controls participated across three sites. Participants were tested in a single session that encompassed self-reported questionnaires including demographic information and balance and mobility testing including the use of wearable sensors. Lasso regression models and the area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (AUC) assessed diagnostic accuracy. Partial correlation coefficients assessed the relationship between each variable with ecologically-relevant functional tasks. Results Multivariate models revealed high diagnostic accuracy, with an AUC of 0.92, using multiple clinic-based turning variables. The complex turning course (CTC) yielded the highest multivariate AUC (95% CI) of 0.90 (0.84, 0.95) for single task, and the average lap time from the CTC had the highest univariate AUC (95% CI) of 0.70 (0.58, 0.78). Turning variables provided added value, indicated by higher AUCs, over standard general assessments of mobility. Turning variables had strong associations with ecologically-relevant functional tasks and outperformed general assessments of mobility. Discussion Clinic-based turning tasks, especially the CTC, have high diagnostic accuracy, strong associations with ecologically-relevant functional tasks, and require relatively short time(s) to complete. Compared to general assessments of mobility, clinic-based turning tasks may be more ecologically-relevant to daily function. Future work should continue to examine the CTC alongside other promising tools for return-to-activity assessments.","PeriodicalId":501453,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy","volume":"168 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.11.24304109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Balance and mobility problems are common consequences after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). However, turning and non-straight locomotion, which are required for daily living, are rarely assessed in clinical tests of function after mTBI. Therefore, the primary goals of this study were to assess 1) the added value of clinic-based turning task variables, obtained using wearable sensors, over standard general assessments of mobility, and 2) assess the associations between general assessments of mobility, objective variables from clinic-based turning tasks, and ecologically-relevant functional tasks. Materials and Methods Fifty-three individuals with mTBI and 57 healthy controls participated across three sites. Participants were tested in a single session that encompassed self-reported questionnaires including demographic information and balance and mobility testing including the use of wearable sensors. Lasso regression models and the area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (AUC) assessed diagnostic accuracy. Partial correlation coefficients assessed the relationship between each variable with ecologically-relevant functional tasks. Results Multivariate models revealed high diagnostic accuracy, with an AUC of 0.92, using multiple clinic-based turning variables. The complex turning course (CTC) yielded the highest multivariate AUC (95% CI) of 0.90 (0.84, 0.95) for single task, and the average lap time from the CTC had the highest univariate AUC (95% CI) of 0.70 (0.58, 0.78). Turning variables provided added value, indicated by higher AUCs, over standard general assessments of mobility. Turning variables had strong associations with ecologically-relevant functional tasks and outperformed general assessments of mobility. Discussion Clinic-based turning tasks, especially the CTC, have high diagnostic accuracy, strong associations with ecologically-relevant functional tasks, and require relatively short time(s) to complete. Compared to general assessments of mobility, clinic-based turning tasks may be more ecologically-relevant to daily function. Future work should continue to examine the CTC alongside other promising tools for return-to-activity assessments.
客观转体测量可提高诊断准确性,并与慢性轻度脑外伤患者的实际行动能力/战斗准备有关
引言 平衡和活动能力问题是轻度脑外伤(mTBI)后常见的后果。然而,在轻度脑损伤后的临床功能测试中,却很少对日常生活所需的转身和非直线运动进行评估。因此,本研究的主要目标是评估:1)使用可穿戴传感器获得的临床转体任务变量与标准的一般活动能力评估相比的附加价值;2)评估一般活动能力评估、临床转体任务的客观变量和生态相关功能任务之间的关联。材料与方法 53 名 mTBI 患者和 57 名健康对照者在三个地点参加了测试。参加者在一次测试中接受了包括人口统计学信息在内的自我报告问卷以及使用可穿戴传感器进行的平衡和活动能力测试。拉索回归模型和接收器-操作者特征曲线下面积(AUC)评估了诊断准确性。偏相关系数评估了每个变量与生态相关功能任务之间的关系。结果 多变量模型显示,使用基于临床的多个翻身变量,诊断准确率很高,AUC 为 0.92。在单一任务方面,复杂转体过程(CTC)的多变量 AUC(95% CI)最高,为 0.90(0.84,0.95),CTC 的平均圈速的单变量 AUC(95% CI)最高,为 0.70(0.58,0.78)。与标准的一般移动能力评估相比,转弯变量提供了更高的AUC值。翻身变量与生态相关的功能任务有很强的关联性,其表现优于一般的活动能力评估。讨论 基于临床的翻身任务,尤其是 CTC,具有很高的诊断准确性,与生态学相关的功能任务有很强的关联性,并且需要相对较短的时间来完成。与一般的活动能力评估相比,以临床为基础的翻身任务可能与日常功能的生态相关性更高。未来的工作应继续将 CTC 与其他有前途的恢复活动能力评估工具一起进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信