{"title":"Evaluation of Technologist-Controlled Factors Used During CT Kidney Stone Examinations.","authors":"Kristin Seitz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify technologist-controlled factors to decrease dose and improve image quality and evaluate their use during computed tomography (CT) kidney stone examinations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Online scholarly databases were searched to acquire peer-reviewed, published articles involving methods of optimizing radiation dose during CT. These articles were reviewed, and the technologist-controlled factors identified were protocol selection, patient centering in the bore, and scan length. The author retrospectively reviewed CT kidney stone examinations performed at a free-standing emergency department to evaluate the use of these factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Technologists consistently chose the correct scan protocol. Reviewed literature was used to determine the acceptable variance for positioning at isocenter and overscanning beyond anatomical landmarks. All patient positioning was off-center in the vertical direction, and in 3 of those examinations, patient positioning was off-center more than the 3 cm threshold. Horizontal off-center positioning was less frequent. All examinations had some amount of overscan, with 73.1% of patients being overscanned more than the determined threshold of 10% of total scan length.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Accurate labeling of protocols at the console assist technologists in choosing protocols correctly. Technologists were inconsistent with patient centering and scan range. The amount of which images were off-center was consistent with previous research studies, while the amount of overscan was less than that found in previous studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Technologists have an important role in optimizing patient radiation dose. Education and quality assurance could help technologists gain awareness of these factors and use them effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":51772,"journal":{"name":"Radiologic Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologic Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To identify technologist-controlled factors to decrease dose and improve image quality and evaluate their use during computed tomography (CT) kidney stone examinations.
Methods: Online scholarly databases were searched to acquire peer-reviewed, published articles involving methods of optimizing radiation dose during CT. These articles were reviewed, and the technologist-controlled factors identified were protocol selection, patient centering in the bore, and scan length. The author retrospectively reviewed CT kidney stone examinations performed at a free-standing emergency department to evaluate the use of these factors.
Results: Technologists consistently chose the correct scan protocol. Reviewed literature was used to determine the acceptable variance for positioning at isocenter and overscanning beyond anatomical landmarks. All patient positioning was off-center in the vertical direction, and in 3 of those examinations, patient positioning was off-center more than the 3 cm threshold. Horizontal off-center positioning was less frequent. All examinations had some amount of overscan, with 73.1% of patients being overscanned more than the determined threshold of 10% of total scan length.
Discussion: Accurate labeling of protocols at the console assist technologists in choosing protocols correctly. Technologists were inconsistent with patient centering and scan range. The amount of which images were off-center was consistent with previous research studies, while the amount of overscan was less than that found in previous studies.
Conclusion: Technologists have an important role in optimizing patient radiation dose. Education and quality assurance could help technologists gain awareness of these factors and use them effectively.
期刊介绍:
Radiologic Technology is an official scholarly journal of the American Society of Radiologic Technologists. Published continuously since 1929, it circulates to more than 145,000 readers worldwide. This award-winning bimonthly Journal covers all disciplines and specialties within medical imaging, including radiography, mammography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, nuclear medicine imaging, sonography and cardiovascular-interventional radiography. In addition to peer-reviewed research articles, Radi