Evaluation of Technologist-Controlled Factors Used During CT Kidney Stone Examinations.

IF 0.7 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Radiologic Technology Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Kristin Seitz
{"title":"Evaluation of Technologist-Controlled Factors Used During CT Kidney Stone Examinations.","authors":"Kristin Seitz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify technologist-controlled factors to decrease dose and improve image quality and evaluate their use during computed tomography (CT) kidney stone examinations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Online scholarly databases were searched to acquire peer-reviewed, published articles involving methods of optimizing radiation dose during CT. These articles were reviewed, and the technologist-controlled factors identified were protocol selection, patient centering in the bore, and scan length. The author retrospectively reviewed CT kidney stone examinations performed at a free-standing emergency department to evaluate the use of these factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Technologists consistently chose the correct scan protocol. Reviewed literature was used to determine the acceptable variance for positioning at isocenter and overscanning beyond anatomical landmarks. All patient positioning was off-center in the vertical direction, and in 3 of those examinations, patient positioning was off-center more than the 3 cm threshold. Horizontal off-center positioning was less frequent. All examinations had some amount of overscan, with 73.1% of patients being overscanned more than the determined threshold of 10% of total scan length.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Accurate labeling of protocols at the console assist technologists in choosing protocols correctly. Technologists were inconsistent with patient centering and scan range. The amount of which images were off-center was consistent with previous research studies, while the amount of overscan was less than that found in previous studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Technologists have an important role in optimizing patient radiation dose. Education and quality assurance could help technologists gain awareness of these factors and use them effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":51772,"journal":{"name":"Radiologic Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologic Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To identify technologist-controlled factors to decrease dose and improve image quality and evaluate their use during computed tomography (CT) kidney stone examinations.

Methods: Online scholarly databases were searched to acquire peer-reviewed, published articles involving methods of optimizing radiation dose during CT. These articles were reviewed, and the technologist-controlled factors identified were protocol selection, patient centering in the bore, and scan length. The author retrospectively reviewed CT kidney stone examinations performed at a free-standing emergency department to evaluate the use of these factors.

Results: Technologists consistently chose the correct scan protocol. Reviewed literature was used to determine the acceptable variance for positioning at isocenter and overscanning beyond anatomical landmarks. All patient positioning was off-center in the vertical direction, and in 3 of those examinations, patient positioning was off-center more than the 3 cm threshold. Horizontal off-center positioning was less frequent. All examinations had some amount of overscan, with 73.1% of patients being overscanned more than the determined threshold of 10% of total scan length.

Discussion: Accurate labeling of protocols at the console assist technologists in choosing protocols correctly. Technologists were inconsistent with patient centering and scan range. The amount of which images were off-center was consistent with previous research studies, while the amount of overscan was less than that found in previous studies.

Conclusion: Technologists have an important role in optimizing patient radiation dose. Education and quality assurance could help technologists gain awareness of these factors and use them effectively.

评估 CT 肾结石检查中使用的技术人员控制因素。
目的:确定由技术人员控制的降低剂量和提高图像质量的因素,并评估这些因素在计算机断层扫描(CT)肾结石检查中的应用情况:对在线学术数据库进行了搜索,以获取经同行评审的、已发表的、涉及 CT 期间辐射剂量优化方法的文章。对这些文章进行了审查,确定了由技术人员控制的因素,包括方案选择、患者在孔内的中心位置和扫描长度。作者回顾性地查看了在一家独立急诊科进行的肾结石 CT 检查,以评估这些因素的使用情况:结果:技术人员始终选择了正确的扫描方案。回顾性文献被用来确定等中心定位和解剖标志物以外的过度扫描的可接受差异。所有患者在垂直方向上的定位都偏离了中心,其中有 3 次检查中,患者的定位偏离中心超过了 3 厘米的阈值。水平方向偏离中心的情况较少。所有检查都存在一定程度的过扫描,73.1%的患者过扫描超过了确定的阈值,即扫描总长度的 10%:讨论:在控制台上准确标注协议有助于技术员正确选择协议。技术员对患者居中和扫描范围的把握不一致。图像偏离中心的数量与之前的研究结果一致,而过度扫描的数量则少于之前的研究结果:结论:技术人员在优化患者辐射剂量方面发挥着重要作用。教育和质量保证可以帮助技术人员了解这些因素并有效利用它们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiologic Technology
Radiologic Technology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: Radiologic Technology is an official scholarly journal of the American Society of Radiologic Technologists. Published continuously since 1929, it circulates to more than 145,000 readers worldwide. This award-winning bimonthly Journal covers all disciplines and specialties within medical imaging, including radiography, mammography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, nuclear medicine imaging, sonography and cardiovascular-interventional radiography. In addition to peer-reviewed research articles, Radi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信