Early Complications of a Novel Retrograde Intramedullary Femoral Nail in the Treatment of Femur Fractures.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
David J Cinats, Azhar Bashir, Clarence B Toney, Jibanananda Satpathy, Stephen L Kates, Paul W Perdue
{"title":"Early Complications of a Novel Retrograde Intramedullary Femoral Nail in the Treatment of Femur Fractures.","authors":"David J Cinats, Azhar Bashir, Clarence B Toney, Jibanananda Satpathy, Stephen L Kates, Paul W Perdue","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the early implant failure rate of a novel retrograde intramedullary femoral nail.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong></p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic level 1 trauma center.</p><p><strong>Patients selection criteria: </strong>Patients aged 18 years and older with an acute OTA/AO 32-A, 32-B, 32-C, and 33-A fractures or periprosthetic distal femur fracture from April 2018 to April 2022 were included in the study. The 2 interventions compared were the Synthes Expert retrograde/antegrade femoral nail (or control implant) versus the next-generation retrograde femoral nail (RFN)-advanced retrograde femoral nail (RFNA or experimental implant) (Synthes, West Chester, PA).</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>Early implant-related complications between the experimental and control implants were assessed including locking screw back out, screw breakage, intramedullary nail failure, need for secondary surgery, and loss of fracture reduction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred fourteen patients were identified with a mean age of 31.0 years, and 62.4% of the patients being male. Open fractures occurred in 32.5% of patients with 3.8% of injuries being distal femur periprosthetic fractures. Fifty-six patients were in the experimental group and 258 patients in the control group. Mean follow-up was 46.8 weeks for the control cohort and 21.0 weeks for the experimental cohort. Distal interlocking screw back out occurred in 23.2% (13 of 56) of the experimental group patients and 1.9% (5 of 258) of the control group patients ( P < 0.0001). Initial diagnosis of interlocking screw back out occurred at an average of 3.2 weeks postoperatively (range, 2-12 weeks). Fifty-four percent of patients who sustained screw back out underwent a secondary operation to remove the symptomatic screws (12.5% of all patients treated with the experimental implant required an unplanned secondary operation due to screw back out). A logistic regression model was used to predict screw back out and found the experimental implant group was 4.3 times as likely to experience distal locking screw back out compared with the control group ( P = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The retrograde femoral nail-advanced implant was associated with a significantly higher rate of screw back out with a substantial number of unplanned secondary surgeries compared with the previous generation of this implant.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":"333-337"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002804","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the early implant failure rate of a novel retrograde intramedullary femoral nail.

Methods:

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Academic level 1 trauma center.

Patients selection criteria: Patients aged 18 years and older with an acute OTA/AO 32-A, 32-B, 32-C, and 33-A fractures or periprosthetic distal femur fracture from April 2018 to April 2022 were included in the study. The 2 interventions compared were the Synthes Expert retrograde/antegrade femoral nail (or control implant) versus the next-generation retrograde femoral nail (RFN)-advanced retrograde femoral nail (RFNA or experimental implant) (Synthes, West Chester, PA).

Outcome measures and comparisons: Early implant-related complications between the experimental and control implants were assessed including locking screw back out, screw breakage, intramedullary nail failure, need for secondary surgery, and loss of fracture reduction.

Results: Three hundred fourteen patients were identified with a mean age of 31.0 years, and 62.4% of the patients being male. Open fractures occurred in 32.5% of patients with 3.8% of injuries being distal femur periprosthetic fractures. Fifty-six patients were in the experimental group and 258 patients in the control group. Mean follow-up was 46.8 weeks for the control cohort and 21.0 weeks for the experimental cohort. Distal interlocking screw back out occurred in 23.2% (13 of 56) of the experimental group patients and 1.9% (5 of 258) of the control group patients ( P < 0.0001). Initial diagnosis of interlocking screw back out occurred at an average of 3.2 weeks postoperatively (range, 2-12 weeks). Fifty-four percent of patients who sustained screw back out underwent a secondary operation to remove the symptomatic screws (12.5% of all patients treated with the experimental implant required an unplanned secondary operation due to screw back out). A logistic regression model was used to predict screw back out and found the experimental implant group was 4.3 times as likely to experience distal locking screw back out compared with the control group ( P = 0.01).

Conclusions: The retrograde femoral nail-advanced implant was associated with a significantly higher rate of screw back out with a substantial number of unplanned secondary surgeries compared with the previous generation of this implant.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

治疗股骨骨折的新型逆行股骨髓内钉的早期并发症。
目的:确定新型逆行股骨髓内钉的早期植入失败率:确定新型逆行股骨髓内钉的早期植入失败率:设计设计:回顾性匹配病例对照:学术一级创伤中心。患者选择标准:研究纳入2018年4月至2022年4月期间18岁及以上急性AO/OTA 32-A、32-B、32-C和33-A骨折或股骨远端假体周围骨折患者。比较的两种干预措施是 Synthes 专家逆行/逆行股骨钉(RAFN 或对照组植入物)与新一代 RFN-Advanced 逆行股骨钉(RFNA 或实验组植入物)(Synthes,宾夕法尼亚州西切斯特):对实验植入物和对照植入物的早期植入相关并发症进行评估,包括锁定螺钉后脱、螺钉断裂、髓内钉失效、二次手术需求和骨折复位损失:314名患者的平均年龄为31.0岁,其中62.4%为男性。32.5%的患者发生开放性骨折,3.8%为股骨远端假体周围骨折。实验组有56名患者,对照组有258名患者。对照组的平均随访时间为46.8周,实验组为21.0周。23.2%的实验组患者(56例中的13例)和1.9%的对照组患者(258例中的5例)发生了远端联锁螺钉反脱(p结论:与上一代RFNA植入物相比,RFNA植入物的螺钉反锁率明显更高,并导致大量意外二次手术:证据等级:治疗III级。有关证据等级的完整描述,请参阅 "作者须知"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信