Clonal analysis of metachronous double biliary tract cancers

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Yuko Omori, Shuichi Aoki, Yusuke Ono, Takashi Kokumai, Shingo Yoshimachi, Hideaki Sato, Akiko Kusaka, Masahiro Iseki, Daisuke Douchi, Takayuki Miura, Shimpei Maeda, Masaharu Ishida, Masamichi Mizuma, Kei Nakagawa, Yusuke Mizukami, Toru Furukawa, Michiaki Unno
{"title":"Clonal analysis of metachronous double biliary tract cancers","authors":"Yuko Omori,&nbsp;Shuichi Aoki,&nbsp;Yusuke Ono,&nbsp;Takashi Kokumai,&nbsp;Shingo Yoshimachi,&nbsp;Hideaki Sato,&nbsp;Akiko Kusaka,&nbsp;Masahiro Iseki,&nbsp;Daisuke Douchi,&nbsp;Takayuki Miura,&nbsp;Shimpei Maeda,&nbsp;Masaharu Ishida,&nbsp;Masamichi Mizuma,&nbsp;Kei Nakagawa,&nbsp;Yusuke Mizukami,&nbsp;Toru Furukawa,&nbsp;Michiaki Unno","doi":"10.1002/path.6265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The molecular mechanisms underpinning the development of metachronous tumors in the remnant bile duct following surgical resection of primary biliary tract carcinomas (BTCs) are unknown. This study aimed to elucidate these mechanisms by evaluating the clinicopathologic features of BTCs, the alterations to 31 BTC-related genes on targeted sequencing, and the aberrant expression of p53, p16, SMAD4, ARID1A and β-catenin on immunohistochemistry. Twelve consecutive patients who underwent resection of metachronous BTCs following primary BTC resection with negative bile duct margins were enrolled. Among the 12 metachronous tumors, six exhibited anterograde growth in the lower portion and six exhibited retrograde growth in the upper portion of the biliary tree. Surgical resection of metachronous BTCs resulted in recurrence-free survival in seven, local recurrence in five, and death in two patients. Nine achieved 5-year overall survival after primary surgery. Molecular analyses revealed that recurrently altered genes were: <i>TP53</i>, <i>SMAD4</i>, <i>CDKN2A</i>, <i>ELF3</i>, <i>ARID1A</i>, <i>GNAS</i>, <i>NF1</i>, <i>STK11</i>, <i>RNF43</i>, <i>KMT2D</i> and <i>ERBB3</i>. Each of these was altered in at least three cases. A comparison of the molecular features between 12 paired primary and metachronous BTCs indicated that 10 (83%) metachronous tumors developed in clonal association with corresponding primary tumors either successionally or phylogenically. The remaining two (17%) developed distinctly. The successional tumors consisted of direct or evolved primary tumor clones that spread along the bile duct. The phylogenic tumors consisted of genetically unstable clones and conferred a poor prognosis. Metachronous tumors distinct from their primaries harbored fewer mutations than successional and phylogenic tumors. In conclusion, over 80% of metachronous BTCs that develop following primary BTC resection are probably molecularly associated with their primaries in either a successional or a phylogenetic manner. Comparison between the molecular features of a metachronous tumor and those of a preceding tumor may provide effective therapeutic clues for the treatment of metachronous BTC. © 2024 The Authors. <i>The Journal of Pathology</i> published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.</p>","PeriodicalId":232,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Pathology","volume":"263 1","pages":"113-127"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/path.6265","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/path.6265","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The molecular mechanisms underpinning the development of metachronous tumors in the remnant bile duct following surgical resection of primary biliary tract carcinomas (BTCs) are unknown. This study aimed to elucidate these mechanisms by evaluating the clinicopathologic features of BTCs, the alterations to 31 BTC-related genes on targeted sequencing, and the aberrant expression of p53, p16, SMAD4, ARID1A and β-catenin on immunohistochemistry. Twelve consecutive patients who underwent resection of metachronous BTCs following primary BTC resection with negative bile duct margins were enrolled. Among the 12 metachronous tumors, six exhibited anterograde growth in the lower portion and six exhibited retrograde growth in the upper portion of the biliary tree. Surgical resection of metachronous BTCs resulted in recurrence-free survival in seven, local recurrence in five, and death in two patients. Nine achieved 5-year overall survival after primary surgery. Molecular analyses revealed that recurrently altered genes were: TP53, SMAD4, CDKN2A, ELF3, ARID1A, GNAS, NF1, STK11, RNF43, KMT2D and ERBB3. Each of these was altered in at least three cases. A comparison of the molecular features between 12 paired primary and metachronous BTCs indicated that 10 (83%) metachronous tumors developed in clonal association with corresponding primary tumors either successionally or phylogenically. The remaining two (17%) developed distinctly. The successional tumors consisted of direct or evolved primary tumor clones that spread along the bile duct. The phylogenic tumors consisted of genetically unstable clones and conferred a poor prognosis. Metachronous tumors distinct from their primaries harbored fewer mutations than successional and phylogenic tumors. In conclusion, over 80% of metachronous BTCs that develop following primary BTC resection are probably molecularly associated with their primaries in either a successional or a phylogenetic manner. Comparison between the molecular features of a metachronous tumor and those of a preceding tumor may provide effective therapeutic clues for the treatment of metachronous BTC. © 2024 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Abstract Image

变异双胆道癌的克隆分析
原发性胆道癌(BTCs)手术切除后,残余胆管中发生间变性肿瘤的分子机制尚不清楚。本研究旨在通过评估 BTC 的临床病理特征、31 个 BTC 相关基因在靶向测序中的改变以及 p53、p16、SMAD4、ARID1A 和 β-catenin 在免疫组化中的异常表达来阐明这些机制。研究人员连续选取了 12 例在胆管边缘阴性的原发性 BTC 切除术后接受变异 BTC 切除术的患者作为研究对象。在这 12 例并发肿瘤中,有 6 例在胆管下端呈逆行生长,6 例在胆管上端呈逆行生长。手术切除后,7 名患者无复发,5 名患者局部复发,2 名患者死亡。九名患者在初次手术后获得了五年总生存期。分子分析显示,反复发生改变的基因包括TP53、SMAD4、CDKN2A、ELF3、ARID1A、GNAS、NF1、STK11、RNF43、KMT2D 和 ERBB3。其中每个病例至少有三个发生了改变。对 12 个配对的原发性和变异性 BTC 的分子特征进行比较后发现,10 个(83%)变异性肿瘤与相应的原发性肿瘤在继承或系统发育上呈克隆关系。其余两个肿瘤(17%)是单独发育的。继发性肿瘤由直接或演变的原发性肿瘤克隆组成,沿胆管扩散。系统性肿瘤由基因不稳定的克隆组成,预后较差。与继发性和系统性肿瘤相比,有别于原发肿瘤的变异较少。总之,80% 以上在原发性 BTC 切除术后出现的间变性 BTC 可能与其原发肿瘤在分子上存在继发或系统发育关系。比较近缘肿瘤和原发肿瘤的分子特征,可为治疗近缘 BTC 提供有效的治疗线索。© 2024 作者。病理学杂志》由约翰威利父子有限公司代表大不列颠及爱尔兰病理学会出版。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Journal of Pathology
The Journal of Pathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
1.40%
发文量
144
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pathology aims to serve as a translational bridge between basic biomedical science and clinical medicine with particular emphasis on, but not restricted to, tissue based studies. The main interests of the Journal lie in publishing studies that further our understanding the pathophysiological and pathogenetic mechanisms of human disease. The Journal of Pathology welcomes investigative studies on human tissues, in vitro and in vivo experimental studies, and investigations based on animal models with a clear relevance to human disease, including transgenic systems. As well as original research papers, the Journal seeks to provide rapid publication in a variety of other formats, including editorials, review articles, commentaries and perspectives and other features, both contributed and solicited.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信