An assessment of the utility of green gravel as a kelp restoration tool in wave-exposed intertidal habitats

IF 1.1 4区 生物学 Q3 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
Hannah S. Earp, Dan A. Smale, Harry J. N. Catherall, Pippa J. Moore
{"title":"An assessment of the utility of green gravel as a kelp restoration tool in wave-exposed intertidal habitats","authors":"Hannah S. Earp, Dan A. Smale, Harry J. N. Catherall, Pippa J. Moore","doi":"10.1017/s0025315424000225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Kelp forests are being degraded and/or lost in many regions, and as such, interest in active kelp restoration approaches to reinstate forests is growing. ‘Green gravel’ is a promising new kelp restoration technique that involves seeding small rocks with kelp zoospores, rearing the gametophyte and juvenile sporophyte stages in aquaria before outplanting them at restoration sites. However, to be considered a viable approach to kelp forest restoration, the efficacy of this technique needs to be assessed across a range of environmental contexts and kelp species. Here, we aimed to understand the utility of green gravel as a kelp restoration technique for wave-exposed intertidal shores. Two substrate types – gravel and cobbles – were seeded with <span>Saccharina latissima</span>, reared in the aquarium and outplanted at two sites along the northeast coast of England. Outplanted rocks were monitored for retention, and the density and length of <span>S. latissima</span>. Juvenile sporophytes persisted on both rock types, although declines in density and variations in length were observed over time. Substrate retention was low, with gravel more likely to be removed from restoration sites compared to cobbles, and all outplanted rocks were lost after eight months. While our initial testing of the green gravel restoration technique on wave-exposed shores was not successful, our results provide important insights for developing/refining the technique and a baseline for comparison for future efforts. However, prior to commencing large-scale kelp restoration in wave-exposed areas using green gravel, further testing of the technique and comparisons with other restoration approaches are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":17477,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0025315424000225","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Kelp forests are being degraded and/or lost in many regions, and as such, interest in active kelp restoration approaches to reinstate forests is growing. ‘Green gravel’ is a promising new kelp restoration technique that involves seeding small rocks with kelp zoospores, rearing the gametophyte and juvenile sporophyte stages in aquaria before outplanting them at restoration sites. However, to be considered a viable approach to kelp forest restoration, the efficacy of this technique needs to be assessed across a range of environmental contexts and kelp species. Here, we aimed to understand the utility of green gravel as a kelp restoration technique for wave-exposed intertidal shores. Two substrate types – gravel and cobbles – were seeded with Saccharina latissima, reared in the aquarium and outplanted at two sites along the northeast coast of England. Outplanted rocks were monitored for retention, and the density and length of S. latissima. Juvenile sporophytes persisted on both rock types, although declines in density and variations in length were observed over time. Substrate retention was low, with gravel more likely to be removed from restoration sites compared to cobbles, and all outplanted rocks were lost after eight months. While our initial testing of the green gravel restoration technique on wave-exposed shores was not successful, our results provide important insights for developing/refining the technique and a baseline for comparison for future efforts. However, prior to commencing large-scale kelp restoration in wave-exposed areas using green gravel, further testing of the technique and comparisons with other restoration approaches are needed.

评估绿砾石作为潮间带生境海藻恢复工具的效用
许多地区的海藻森林正在退化和/或消失,因此,人们对积极恢复海藻森林的方法越来越感兴趣。绿色砾石 "是一种很有前景的海带恢复新技术,它是指在小石头上播种海带孢子,在水族箱中饲养配子体和幼孢子体阶段,然后将其移植到恢复地点。然而,要将这种技术视为一种可行的海藻森林恢复方法,还需要在一系列环境背景和海藻物种中对其有效性进行评估。在这里,我们旨在了解绿砾石作为海藻修复技术在潮间带暴露海岸的实用性。两种基质类型--砾石和鹅卵石--被播种上在水族箱中饲养的 Saccharina latissima,并将其移栽到英格兰东北海岸的两个地点。监测了外植岩石的保留情况以及 S. latissima 的密度和长度。虽然随着时间的推移,幼孢子体的密度有所下降,长度也有变化,但在两种类型的岩石上都能存活。底质保持率较低,与鹅卵石相比,砾石更容易从修复地点移走,所有移出的石头在八个月后都消失了。虽然我们在海浪暴露海岸上对绿色砾石修复技术的初步测试并不成功,但我们的结果为开发/改进该技术提供了重要启示,并为未来的工作提供了比较基准。不过,在开始使用绿砾石在海浪暴露区大规模恢复海带之前,还需要对该技术进行进一步测试,并与其他恢复方法进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
68
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JMBA is an international journal, publishing original research on all aspects of marine biology. It includes pioneering work taking place today on major issues concerning marine organisms and their environment. Subjects covered include: ecological surveys and population studies of marine communities; physiology and experimental biology; taxonomy, morphology and life history of marine animals and plants; and chemical and physical oceanographic work. Included with 2010 online subscriptions: Marine Biodiversity Records.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信