Home-based exercise program for people with residual disability following hospitalization for COVID-19: Randomized control trial

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Mara Paneroni , Simonetta Scalvini , Elisa Perger , Elisabetta Zampogna , Simone Govetto , Federico Mattia Oliva , Ambra Matrone , Palmira Bernocchi , Debora Rosa , Michele Vitacca
{"title":"Home-based exercise program for people with residual disability following hospitalization for COVID-19: Randomized control trial","authors":"Mara Paneroni ,&nbsp;Simonetta Scalvini ,&nbsp;Elisa Perger ,&nbsp;Elisabetta Zampogna ,&nbsp;Simone Govetto ,&nbsp;Federico Mattia Oliva ,&nbsp;Ambra Matrone ,&nbsp;Palmira Bernocchi ,&nbsp;Debora Rosa ,&nbsp;Michele Vitacca","doi":"10.1016/j.rehab.2023.101815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The best exercise program for individuals with effort intolerance or hypoxia at rest and/or during exercise post-COVID-19 treatment who have already had in-hospital rehabilitation remains unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>We evaluated the efficacy of a home-based rehabilitation exercise program intervention that included teleconsultations with a specialist nurse.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a multicenter randomized controlled trial for individuals who had been diagnosed with, and treated for, COVID-19. Despite inpatient rehabilitation they still had effort intolerance; this was defined as being a) only able to walk &lt;70 % of the predicted distance during the six-minute walking test (6MWT) and/or b) oxygen desaturation all day long/during effort. The primary outcome was effort tolerance, as evaluated by the 6MWT. Secondary outcomes were dyspnea, fatigue, spirometry, respiratory muscle evaluations, and oxygenation. The Intervention group performed 4 weeks of a self-directed exercise program with bi-weekly physiotherapist video calls; the Control group participated in physical activity howsoever they wished. Exercises were divided into 4 intensity levels according to disability and oxygen desaturation. The program progressively increased from low (walking, free-body exercise, sit-to-stand, and balance exercises) to high (speed walking with a pedometer, cycle ergometer, and strengthening exercises).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 79 participants: 40 in the Intervention and 39 in the Control group. Mean (SD) age was 67.1 (10.3) years; 72 % (<em>n</em> = 57) were male. No intergroup differences in effort tolerance were found [Intervention 77.6 (75.4)m vs Control 49.5 (73.3)m (<em>p</em> = 0.109)]. Participants with 6MWT distance results &lt; lower limit of normality values showed best improvements in mean (SD) effort tolerance: Intervention, 120.1 (75.8)m vs Control, 59.1 (75.6)m (<em>p</em> = 0.035). After 2 months, mean (SD) 6MWT distances in the 2 groups were similar: Intervention, 475.9 (82.4)m vs Control, 469.2 (118.9)m (<em>p</em> = 0.807).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In individuals with residual disability post-COVID-19 and after inpatient rehabilitation, a home-based exercise program with teleconsultation significantly improves effort tolerance but only for people who had severe effort intolerance at baseline.</p></div><div><h3>Database registration</h3><p>ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04821934</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine","volume":"67 2","pages":"Article 101815"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877065723000866","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The best exercise program for individuals with effort intolerance or hypoxia at rest and/or during exercise post-COVID-19 treatment who have already had in-hospital rehabilitation remains unknown.

Objective

We evaluated the efficacy of a home-based rehabilitation exercise program intervention that included teleconsultations with a specialist nurse.

Methods

This was a multicenter randomized controlled trial for individuals who had been diagnosed with, and treated for, COVID-19. Despite inpatient rehabilitation they still had effort intolerance; this was defined as being a) only able to walk <70 % of the predicted distance during the six-minute walking test (6MWT) and/or b) oxygen desaturation all day long/during effort. The primary outcome was effort tolerance, as evaluated by the 6MWT. Secondary outcomes were dyspnea, fatigue, spirometry, respiratory muscle evaluations, and oxygenation. The Intervention group performed 4 weeks of a self-directed exercise program with bi-weekly physiotherapist video calls; the Control group participated in physical activity howsoever they wished. Exercises were divided into 4 intensity levels according to disability and oxygen desaturation. The program progressively increased from low (walking, free-body exercise, sit-to-stand, and balance exercises) to high (speed walking with a pedometer, cycle ergometer, and strengthening exercises).

Results

We included 79 participants: 40 in the Intervention and 39 in the Control group. Mean (SD) age was 67.1 (10.3) years; 72 % (n = 57) were male. No intergroup differences in effort tolerance were found [Intervention 77.6 (75.4)m vs Control 49.5 (73.3)m (p = 0.109)]. Participants with 6MWT distance results < lower limit of normality values showed best improvements in mean (SD) effort tolerance: Intervention, 120.1 (75.8)m vs Control, 59.1 (75.6)m (p = 0.035). After 2 months, mean (SD) 6MWT distances in the 2 groups were similar: Intervention, 475.9 (82.4)m vs Control, 469.2 (118.9)m (p = 0.807).

Conclusions

In individuals with residual disability post-COVID-19 and after inpatient rehabilitation, a home-based exercise program with teleconsultation significantly improves effort tolerance but only for people who had severe effort intolerance at baseline.

Database registration

ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04821934

针对因 COVID-19 住院治疗后残留残疾者的家庭锻炼计划:随机对照试验
背景对于 COVID-19 治疗后在休息和/或运动时出现费力不耐受或缺氧的患者,如果他们已经接受了院内康复治疗,那么他们的最佳运动计划是什么仍不得而知。方法这是一项多中心随机对照试验,针对的是已确诊并接受 COVID-19 治疗的患者。尽管接受了住院康复治疗,但他们仍有耐力不足的问题;耐力不足的定义是:a)在六分钟步行测试(6MWT)中只能走完预测距离的 70%,和/或 b)全天/在耐力不足时出现血氧饱和度下降。6MWT 评估的主要结果是努力耐受性。次要结果是呼吸困难、疲劳、肺活量、呼吸肌评估和氧饱和度。干预组进行为期 4 周的自我指导锻炼计划,每两周与理疗师进行一次视频通话;对照组则按照自己的意愿参加体育锻炼。运动强度根据残疾程度和血氧饱和度分为 4 个等级。运动强度从低强度(步行、自由体操、坐立和平衡练习)逐渐增加到高强度(使用计步器速走、自行车测力计和强化练习):干预组 40 人,对照组 39 人。平均(标清)年龄为 67.1 (10.3)岁;72%(n = 57)为男性。在努力耐受力方面没有发现组间差异[干预组 77.6 (75.4)m vs 对照组 49.5 (73.3)m (p = 0.109)]。6MWT距离结果为正常值下限的参与者在平均(标清)努力耐受性方面表现出最佳改善:干预组,120.1 (75.8)m vs 对照组,59.1 (75.6)m (p = 0.035)。2个月后,两组的平均(标清)6MWT距离相似:干预组,475.9 (82.4)m vs 对照组,469.2 (118.9)m (p = 0.807)。结论在COVID-19后和住院康复后有残余残疾的人中,带有远程咨询的家庭锻炼计划能显著改善用力耐受性,但仅限于基线时有严重用力不耐受的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
136
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine covers all areas of Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine; such as: methods of evaluation of motor, sensory, cognitive and visceral impairments; acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain; disabilities in adult and children ; processes of rehabilitation in orthopaedic, rhumatological, neurological, cardiovascular, pulmonary and urological diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信