Telemedicine for Routine Prenatal Care: Use and Satisfaction During the COVID-19 Pandemic

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Katrina K. Wu CNM, PhD, Julia Phillippi CNM, PhD, Martina Mueller PhD, Cristina Lopez PhD, Michelle Nichols PhD, RN
{"title":"Telemedicine for Routine Prenatal Care: Use and Satisfaction During the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Katrina K. Wu CNM, PhD,&nbsp;Julia Phillippi CNM, PhD,&nbsp;Martina Mueller PhD,&nbsp;Cristina Lopez PhD,&nbsp;Michelle Nichols PhD, RN","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.13621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Telemedicine use in prenatal care has greatly expanded without substantial research. Optimizing user experiences can increase telemedicine's utilization to support care access. The purpose of this study was to explore patient and provider experiences using telemedicine for routine prenatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic, identifying factors affecting its utilization and satisfaction.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In this mixed methods study, online surveys and semi-structured interviews with pregnant and postpartum patients and perinatal providers across the United States were used to explore experiences with telemedicine and prenatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data were collected from July to December 2021. Survey findings were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, and interviews were thematically coded and analyzed, followed by mixed methods analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Results of 946 surveys (750 patients and 196 providers) and 30 interviews (15 patients and 15 providers) met inclusion for analysis. Telemedicine was utilized by 42% of patients and 72% of perinatal provider participants. The primary reason patients did not use telemedicine was because it was not offered. Patients and providers who did not use telemedicine expressed the following main concerns with virtual care: uncertainty about care quality, particularly when blood pressure and the fetal heart rate were not assessed, and potential challenges with developing trusting patient-provider relationships. Patients and providers who used telemedicine rated their experience as mild to moderate satisfaction across the 6 Telehealth Usability Questionnaire domains. Satisfaction scores were not dependent on whether physical examination components were included in virtual visits.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Providing patients with the choice to use telemedicine as needed or combined with in-person visits for routine prenatal care may increase care utilization. Although not directly linked with satisfaction, interest in using telemedicine would likely increase for patients and providers concerned with care quality if blood pressure and fetal heart rate are assessed during virtual visits.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":"69 4","pages":"469-478"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmwh.13621","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Telemedicine use in prenatal care has greatly expanded without substantial research. Optimizing user experiences can increase telemedicine's utilization to support care access. The purpose of this study was to explore patient and provider experiences using telemedicine for routine prenatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic, identifying factors affecting its utilization and satisfaction.

Methods

In this mixed methods study, online surveys and semi-structured interviews with pregnant and postpartum patients and perinatal providers across the United States were used to explore experiences with telemedicine and prenatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data were collected from July to December 2021. Survey findings were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, and interviews were thematically coded and analyzed, followed by mixed methods analysis.

Results

Results of 946 surveys (750 patients and 196 providers) and 30 interviews (15 patients and 15 providers) met inclusion for analysis. Telemedicine was utilized by 42% of patients and 72% of perinatal provider participants. The primary reason patients did not use telemedicine was because it was not offered. Patients and providers who did not use telemedicine expressed the following main concerns with virtual care: uncertainty about care quality, particularly when blood pressure and the fetal heart rate were not assessed, and potential challenges with developing trusting patient-provider relationships. Patients and providers who used telemedicine rated their experience as mild to moderate satisfaction across the 6 Telehealth Usability Questionnaire domains. Satisfaction scores were not dependent on whether physical examination components were included in virtual visits.

Discussion

Providing patients with the choice to use telemedicine as needed or combined with in-person visits for routine prenatal care may increase care utilization. Although not directly linked with satisfaction, interest in using telemedicine would likely increase for patients and providers concerned with care quality if blood pressure and fetal heart rate are assessed during virtual visits.

产前常规护理的远程医疗:在 COVID-19 大流行期间的使用情况和满意度。
导言:远程医疗在产前护理中的应用在没有大量研究的情况下已大大扩展。优化用户体验可以提高远程医疗的使用率,从而支持医疗服务的可及性。本研究旨在探讨 COVID-19 大流行期间患者和医疗服务提供者使用远程医疗进行常规产前护理的经验,确定影响其使用率和满意度的因素:在这项混合方法研究中,采用了在线调查和半结构化访谈的方式,对美国各地的孕妇和产后患者以及围产期医疗服务提供者进行了调查,以探讨在 COVID-19 大流行期间使用远程医疗和产前护理的经验。数据收集时间为 2021 年 7 月至 12 月。采用描述性和推论性统计方法对调查结果进行分析,并对访谈进行主题编码和分析,然后采用混合方法进行分析:946 份调查(750 名患者和 196 名医疗服务提供者)和 30 个访谈(15 名患者和 15 名医疗服务提供者)的结果符合纳入分析的要求。42%的患者和 72% 的围产期医疗服务提供者使用了远程医疗。患者不使用远程医疗的主要原因是没有提供远程医疗服务。未使用远程医疗的患者和医疗服务提供者对虚拟医疗表达了以下主要担忧:医疗质量的不确定性,尤其是在未评估血压和胎儿心率的情况下,以及建立患者与医疗服务提供者之间信任关系的潜在挑战。使用远程医疗的患者和医疗服务提供者在远程医疗可用性问卷的 6 个领域中将其体验评为轻度至中度满意。满意度评分与虚拟就诊中是否包含体格检查内容无关:讨论:为患者提供根据需要使用远程医疗的选择,或在常规产前护理中将远程医疗与面诊相结合,可提高护理利用率。虽然与满意度没有直接联系,但如果在虚拟就诊期间对血压和胎儿心率进行评估,对于关注护理质量的患者和医疗服务提供者来说,使用远程医疗的兴趣可能会增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Midwifery & Women''s Health (JMWH) is a bimonthly, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of original research and review articles that focus on midwifery and women''s health. JMWH provides a forum for interdisciplinary exchange across a broad range of women''s health issues. Manuscripts that address midwifery, women''s health, education, evidence-based practice, public health, policy, and research are welcomed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信