HOW DO WORK HIERARCHIES AND STRICT DIVISIONS OF LABOUR IMPACT CARE WORKERS' EXPERIENCES OF HEALTH AND SAFETY? CASE STUDIESOF LONG TERM CARE IN TORONTO.

I Syed, T Daly, P Armstrong, R Lowndes, M Chadoin, V Naidoo
{"title":"HOW DO WORK HIERARCHIES AND STRICT DIVISIONS OF LABOUR IMPACT CARE WORKERS' EXPERIENCES OF HEALTH AND SAFETY? CASE STUDIESOF LONG TERM CARE IN TORONTO.","authors":"I Syed, T Daly, P Armstrong, R Lowndes, M Chadoin, V Naidoo","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>According to the Canadian Health Care Association (1), there are 2,577 long-term care (\"LTC\") facilities across Canada, with the largest proportion (33.4%) located in Ontario. Most studies focus on residents' health, with less attention paid to the health and safety experiences of staff. Given that the work performed in Ontario LTC facilities is very gendered, increasingly racialized, task-oriented, and with strict divisions of labour, this paper explores in what ways some of these factors impact workers' experiences of health and safety.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study objectives included the following research question: How are work hierarchies and task orientation experienced by staff?</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>This paper draws on data from rapid team-based ethnographies of the shifting division of labour in LTC due to use of informal carers in six non-profit LTC facilities located in Toronto, Ontario.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our method involved conducting observations and key informant interviews (N=167) with registered nurses, registered practical nurses, personal support workers, dietary aides, recreation therapists, families, privately paid companions, students, and volunteers. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analyzed. For observations, researchers were paired and covered shifts between 7 a.m. and 11 p.m., as well as into the late night over six days, at each of the six sites. Detailed ethnographic field notes were written during and immediately following observational fieldwork.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results indicate that employee stress is linked to the experiences of care work hierarchies, task orientation, and strict divisions of labour between and among various staff designations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings from this project confirm and extend current research that demonstrates there are challenging working conditions in LTC, which can result in occupational health and safety problems, as well as stress for individual workers.</p>","PeriodicalId":75093,"journal":{"name":"The journal of nursing home research sciences","volume":"2 1","pages":"41-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5218838/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of nursing home research sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: According to the Canadian Health Care Association (1), there are 2,577 long-term care ("LTC") facilities across Canada, with the largest proportion (33.4%) located in Ontario. Most studies focus on residents' health, with less attention paid to the health and safety experiences of staff. Given that the work performed in Ontario LTC facilities is very gendered, increasingly racialized, task-oriented, and with strict divisions of labour, this paper explores in what ways some of these factors impact workers' experiences of health and safety.

Objectives: The study objectives included the following research question: How are work hierarchies and task orientation experienced by staff?

Design and setting: This paper draws on data from rapid team-based ethnographies of the shifting division of labour in LTC due to use of informal carers in six non-profit LTC facilities located in Toronto, Ontario.

Methods: Our method involved conducting observations and key informant interviews (N=167) with registered nurses, registered practical nurses, personal support workers, dietary aides, recreation therapists, families, privately paid companions, students, and volunteers. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analyzed. For observations, researchers were paired and covered shifts between 7 a.m. and 11 p.m., as well as into the late night over six days, at each of the six sites. Detailed ethnographic field notes were written during and immediately following observational fieldwork.

Results: Our results indicate that employee stress is linked to the experiences of care work hierarchies, task orientation, and strict divisions of labour between and among various staff designations.

Conclusion: Findings from this project confirm and extend current research that demonstrates there are challenging working conditions in LTC, which can result in occupational health and safety problems, as well as stress for individual workers.

工作等级制度和严格的劳动分工如何影响护理工作者的健康和安全体验?多伦多长期护理案例研究。
背景:根据加拿大医疗保健协会(1)的数据,加拿大全国共有 2,577 家长期护理("LTC")机构,其中安大略省所占比例最大(33.4%)。大多数研究都集中在居民的健康方面,而较少关注员工的健康和安全体验。鉴于安大略省长者护理机构的工作非常注重性别、日益种族化、任务导向和严格的劳动分工,本文探讨了其中一些因素如何影响工作人员的健康和安全体验:研究目标包括以下研究问题:设计与环境:本文借鉴了安大略省多伦多市六家非营利性 LTC 机构因使用非正式护理人员而导致 LTC 分工变化的快速团队人种学研究数据:我们的方法包括对注册护士、注册执业护士、个人支持工作者、饮食助理、娱乐治疗师、家属、私人付费陪护、学生和志愿者进行观察和关键信息提供者访谈(N=167)。对访谈进行了录音、逐字记录和主题分析。在观察过程中,研究人员配对轮班,在六个地点的每一个地点观察六天,观察时间从早上 7 点到晚上 11 点,并一直观察到深夜。在实地观察期间和观察结束后立即撰写了详细的人种学实地笔记:结果:我们的研究结果表明,员工的压力与护理工作的等级制度、任务导向以及不同员工之间的严格分工有关:本项目的研究结果证实并扩展了当前的研究,这些研究表明,长期护理中心的工作条件具有挑战性,可能导致职业健康和安全问题,并给员工个人带来压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信