The correlation between carotid artery Doppler and stroke volume during central blood volume loss and resuscitation.

IF 1.7 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Acute and Critical Care Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-23 DOI:10.4266/acc.2023.01095
Isabel Kerrebijn, Sarah Atwi, Mai Elfarnawany, Andrew M Eibl, Joseph K Eibl, Jenna L Taylor, Chul Ho Kim, Bruce D Johnson, Jon-Émile S Kenny
{"title":"The correlation between carotid artery Doppler and stroke volume during central blood volume loss and resuscitation.","authors":"Isabel Kerrebijn, Sarah Atwi, Mai Elfarnawany, Andrew M Eibl, Joseph K Eibl, Jenna L Taylor, Chul Ho Kim, Bruce D Johnson, Jon-Émile S Kenny","doi":"10.4266/acc.2023.01095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Using peripheral arteries to infer central hemodynamics is common among hemodynamic monitors. Doppler ultrasound of the common carotid artery has been used in this manner with conflicting results. We investigated the relationship between changing common carotid artery Doppler measures and stroke volume (SV), hypothesizing that more consecutively-averaged cardiac cycles would improve SV-carotid Doppler correlation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-seven healthy volunteers were recruited and studied in a physiology laboratory. Carotid artery Doppler pulse was measured with a wearable, wireless ultrasound during central hypovolemia and resuscitation induced by a stepped lower body negative pressure protocol. The change in maximum velocity time integral (VTI) and corrected flow time of the carotid artery (ccFT) were compared with changing SV using repeated measures correlation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 73,431 cardiac cycles were compared across 27 subjects. There was a strong linear correlation between changing SV and carotid Doppler measures during simulated hemorrhage (repeated-measures linear correlation [Rrm ]=0.91 for VTI; 0.88 for ccFT). This relationship improved with larger numbers of consecutively-averaged cardiac cycles. For ccFT, beyond four consecutively-averaged cardiac cycles the correlation coefficient remained strong (i.e., Rrm of at least 0.80). For VTI, the correlation coefficient with SV was strong for any number of averaged cardiac cycles. For both ccFT and VTI, Rrm remained stable around 25 consecutively-averaged cardiac cycles.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was a strong linear correlation between changing SV and carotid Doppler measures during central blood volume loss. The strength of this relationship was dependent upon the number of consecutively-averaged cardiac cycles.</p>","PeriodicalId":44118,"journal":{"name":"Acute and Critical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11002613/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute and Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4266/acc.2023.01095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Using peripheral arteries to infer central hemodynamics is common among hemodynamic monitors. Doppler ultrasound of the common carotid artery has been used in this manner with conflicting results. We investigated the relationship between changing common carotid artery Doppler measures and stroke volume (SV), hypothesizing that more consecutively-averaged cardiac cycles would improve SV-carotid Doppler correlation.

Methods: Twenty-seven healthy volunteers were recruited and studied in a physiology laboratory. Carotid artery Doppler pulse was measured with a wearable, wireless ultrasound during central hypovolemia and resuscitation induced by a stepped lower body negative pressure protocol. The change in maximum velocity time integral (VTI) and corrected flow time of the carotid artery (ccFT) were compared with changing SV using repeated measures correlation.

Results: In total, 73,431 cardiac cycles were compared across 27 subjects. There was a strong linear correlation between changing SV and carotid Doppler measures during simulated hemorrhage (repeated-measures linear correlation [Rrm ]=0.91 for VTI; 0.88 for ccFT). This relationship improved with larger numbers of consecutively-averaged cardiac cycles. For ccFT, beyond four consecutively-averaged cardiac cycles the correlation coefficient remained strong (i.e., Rrm of at least 0.80). For VTI, the correlation coefficient with SV was strong for any number of averaged cardiac cycles. For both ccFT and VTI, Rrm remained stable around 25 consecutively-averaged cardiac cycles.

Conclusions: There was a strong linear correlation between changing SV and carotid Doppler measures during central blood volume loss. The strength of this relationship was dependent upon the number of consecutively-averaged cardiac cycles.

中枢性血容量丢失和复苏期间颈动脉多普勒与每搏容量之间的相关性。
背景:使用外周动脉推断中心血流动力学在血流动力学监护仪中很常见。颈总动脉多普勒超声已被用于这种方式,但结果却相互矛盾。我们研究了不断变化的颈总动脉多普勒测量值与每搏容量(SV)之间的关系,假设更多的连续平均心动周期将改善 SV 与颈动脉多普勒的相关性:方法:招募 27 名健康志愿者,在生理学实验室进行研究。方法:招募了 27 名健康志愿者,在生理学实验室进行了研究。在中心低血容量和阶梯式下半身负压方案诱导的复苏过程中,使用可穿戴无线超声波测量了颈动脉多普勒脉搏。使用重复测量相关性比较了颈动脉最大速度时间积分(VTI)和校正血流时间(ccFT)的变化与 SV 变化的关系:结果:总共对 27 名受试者的 73431 个心动周期进行了比较。在模拟出血过程中,SV 变化与颈动脉多普勒测量之间存在很强的线性相关(重复测量线性相关 [Rrm ]=0.91 (VTI;0.88 (ccFT))。这种关系随着连续平均心动周期的增加而改善。对于 ccFT,超过四个连续平均心动周期后,相关系数仍然很强(即 Rrm 至少为 0.80)。对于 VTI,在任何平均心动周期数下,其与 SV 的相关系数都很强。对于 ccFT 和 VTI,Rrm 在 25 个连续平均心动周期左右保持稳定:结论:在中心血容量丢失期间,SV 的变化与颈动脉多普勒测量之间存在很强的线性相关。这种关系的强度取决于连续平均心动周期的数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acute and Critical Care
Acute and Critical Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
87
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信