The paradox of haemodialysis: the lived experience of the clocked treatment of chronic illness.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Health Sociology Review Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-12 DOI:10.1080/14461242.2024.2319189
Victoria Cluley, James O Burton, Katherine L Hull, Helen Eborall
{"title":"The paradox of haemodialysis: the lived experience of the clocked treatment of chronic illness.","authors":"Victoria Cluley, James O Burton, Katherine L Hull, Helen Eborall","doi":"10.1080/14461242.2024.2319189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studies exploring the relationship between time and chronic illness have generally focused on measurable aspects of time, also known as linear time. Linear time follows a predictable, sequential order of past, present and future; measured using a clock and predicated on normative assumptions. Sociological concepts addressing lifecourse disruption following diagnosis of chronic illness have served to enhance the understanding of lived experience. To understand the nuanced relationship between time and chronic illness, however, requires further exploration. Here, we show how the implicit assumptions of linear time meet in tension with the lived experience of chronic illness. We draw on interviews and photovoice work with people with end-stage kidney disease in receipt of in-centre-daytime haemodialysis to show how the clocked treatment of chronic illness disrupts experiences of time. Drawing on concepts of 'crip' and 'chronic' time we argue that clocked treatment and the lived experience of chronic illness converge at a paradox whereby clocked treatment allows for the continuation of linear time yet limits freedom. We use the concept of 'crip time' to challenge the normative assumptions implicit within linear concepts of time and argue that the understanding of chronic illness and its treatment would benefit from a 'cripped' starting point.</p>","PeriodicalId":46833,"journal":{"name":"Health Sociology Review","volume":" ","pages":"24-42"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Sociology Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2024.2319189","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies exploring the relationship between time and chronic illness have generally focused on measurable aspects of time, also known as linear time. Linear time follows a predictable, sequential order of past, present and future; measured using a clock and predicated on normative assumptions. Sociological concepts addressing lifecourse disruption following diagnosis of chronic illness have served to enhance the understanding of lived experience. To understand the nuanced relationship between time and chronic illness, however, requires further exploration. Here, we show how the implicit assumptions of linear time meet in tension with the lived experience of chronic illness. We draw on interviews and photovoice work with people with end-stage kidney disease in receipt of in-centre-daytime haemodialysis to show how the clocked treatment of chronic illness disrupts experiences of time. Drawing on concepts of 'crip' and 'chronic' time we argue that clocked treatment and the lived experience of chronic illness converge at a paradox whereby clocked treatment allows for the continuation of linear time yet limits freedom. We use the concept of 'crip time' to challenge the normative assumptions implicit within linear concepts of time and argue that the understanding of chronic illness and its treatment would benefit from a 'cripped' starting point.

血液透析的悖论:按时治疗慢性病的生活体验。
探讨时间与慢性疾病之间关系的研究通常侧重于时间的可测量方面,也称为线性时间。线性时间遵循过去、现在和未来的可预测顺序,使用时钟测量,并以规范假设为前提。针对慢性病诊断后生命历程中断的社会学概念有助于加深对生活经历的理解。然而,要理解时间与慢性病之间的微妙关系,还需要进一步的探索。在此,我们将展示线性时间的隐含假设如何与慢性病的生活体验产生矛盾。我们通过对接受中心日间血液透析的终末期肾病患者的访谈和摄影舆论工作,来展示慢性病的计时治疗是如何扰乱时间体验的。根据 "慢性 "时间和 "慢性 "时间的概念,我们认为定时治疗和慢性病患者的生活体验存在一个悖论,即定时治疗允许线性时间的延续,但却限制了自由。我们使用 "跛行时间 "的概念来挑战线性时间概念中隐含的规范性假设,并认为从 "跛行 "的起点来理解慢性病及其治疗将是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: An international, scholarly peer-reviewed journal, Health Sociology Review explores the contribution of sociology and sociological research methods to understanding health and illness; to health policy, promotion and practice; and to equity, social justice, social policy and social work. Health Sociology Review is published in association with The Australian Sociological Association (TASA) under the editorship of Eileen Willis. Health Sociology Review publishes original theoretical and research articles, literature reviews, special issues, symposia, commentaries and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信