Triple injection peri-sartorius (TIPS) block for postoperative analgesia after total knee arthroplasty: Randomised controlled study.

IF 2.9 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-22 DOI:10.4103/ija.ija_936_23
Ahmad Samir Alabd, Moustafa Abdelaziz Moustafa, Aly Mahmoud Moustafa Ahmed
{"title":"Triple injection peri-sartorius (TIPS) block for postoperative analgesia after total knee arthroplasty: Randomised controlled study.","authors":"Ahmad Samir Alabd, Moustafa Abdelaziz Moustafa, Aly Mahmoud Moustafa Ahmed","doi":"10.4103/ija.ija_936_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Motor-sparing analgesia after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is crucial. The primary endpoint was the postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score after triple injection peri-sartorius (TIPS) block after TKA. Secondary endpoints were postoperative morphine consumption, 24-h postoperative ambulation distances and the degrees of active knee extension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After general anaesthesia or spinal anaesthesia administration and before surgical incision, 80 patients undergoing TKA were randomised into group TIPS (received ultrasound-guided TIPS block where 40 ml 0.25% bupivacaine and 4 mg dexamethasone were injected: 10 ml at the distal femoral triangle, 10 ml above the sartorius and 20 ml at the distal adductor canal) and group FNB (femoral nerve block; received ultrasound-guided FNB with 20 ml 0.25% bupivacaine mixed with 4 mg dexamethasone). Postoperative pain score was noted and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dynamic VAS scores were lower in the TIPS group than in FNB, while the resting VAS scores were not significantly different. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) postoperative morphine consumption was 5.82 (2.47) mg in the TIPS group (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.03,6.61) versus 9.87 (2.99) mg in the FNB group (95% CI 8.91,10.83). Ambulation distances and active postoperative knee extension in the TIPS group showed greater significance than in the FNB group (TIPS: 18.0 [7.37] m, 95% CI 15.64,20.35] vs. FNB: 8.95 [5.93] m, 95% CI 7.05,10.84) and (TIPS: 52.12 [16.39], 95% CI 46.88,57.33 vs. FNB: 26.05 [11.10], 95% CI 22.501,29.59). Nausea was more evident in FNB patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TIPS block provides superior analgesia than FNB with motor sparing of the quadriceps after TKA.</p>","PeriodicalId":13339,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10926342/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_936_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Motor-sparing analgesia after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is crucial. The primary endpoint was the postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score after triple injection peri-sartorius (TIPS) block after TKA. Secondary endpoints were postoperative morphine consumption, 24-h postoperative ambulation distances and the degrees of active knee extension.

Methods: After general anaesthesia or spinal anaesthesia administration and before surgical incision, 80 patients undergoing TKA were randomised into group TIPS (received ultrasound-guided TIPS block where 40 ml 0.25% bupivacaine and 4 mg dexamethasone were injected: 10 ml at the distal femoral triangle, 10 ml above the sartorius and 20 ml at the distal adductor canal) and group FNB (femoral nerve block; received ultrasound-guided FNB with 20 ml 0.25% bupivacaine mixed with 4 mg dexamethasone). Postoperative pain score was noted and compared.

Results: Dynamic VAS scores were lower in the TIPS group than in FNB, while the resting VAS scores were not significantly different. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) postoperative morphine consumption was 5.82 (2.47) mg in the TIPS group (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.03,6.61) versus 9.87 (2.99) mg in the FNB group (95% CI 8.91,10.83). Ambulation distances and active postoperative knee extension in the TIPS group showed greater significance than in the FNB group (TIPS: 18.0 [7.37] m, 95% CI 15.64,20.35] vs. FNB: 8.95 [5.93] m, 95% CI 7.05,10.84) and (TIPS: 52.12 [16.39], 95% CI 46.88,57.33 vs. FNB: 26.05 [11.10], 95% CI 22.501,29.59). Nausea was more evident in FNB patients.

Conclusion: TIPS block provides superior analgesia than FNB with motor sparing of the quadriceps after TKA.

用于全膝关节置换术后镇痛的三重腓肠肌周围注射(TIPS)阻滞:随机对照研究。
背景和目的:全膝关节置换术(TKA)后的运动保护镇痛至关重要。主要终点是TKA术后三联腓肠肌周围注射阻滞(TIPS)后的术后视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分。次要终点是术后吗啡消耗量、术后 24 小时行走距离和膝关节主动伸展度:在全身麻醉或脊髓麻醉后、手术切口前,80 名接受 TKA 的患者被随机分为 TIPS 组(接受超声引导下的 TIPS 阻滞,其中 40 毫升 0.25% 布比卡因和 4 毫克地塞米松:股骨远端三角区 10 毫升,腓肠肌上方 10 毫升,内收肌远端 20 毫升)和 FNB 组(股神经阻滞;接受超声引导下的 FNB,20 毫升 0.25% 布比卡因混合 4 毫克地塞米松)。对术后疼痛评分进行记录和比较:结果:TIPS组的动态VAS评分低于FNB组,而静态VAS评分无明显差异。TIPS 组术后吗啡用量的平均值(标准差 [SD])为 5.82 (2.47) 毫克(95% 置信区间 [CI] 5.03,6.61),而 FNB 组为 9.87 (2.99) 毫克(95% 置信区间 [CI] 8.91,10.83)。与 FNB 组相比,TIPS 组的行走距离和术后膝关节主动伸展的意义更大(TIPS:18.0[7.37]米,95% CI 15.64,20.35]对 FNB:8.95[5.93]米,95% CI 7.05,10.84)和(TIPS:52.12 [16.39], 95% CI 46.88,57.33 vs. FNB: 26.05 [11.10], 95% CI 22.501,29.59)。结论:结论:TKA术后,TIPS阻滞的镇痛效果优于FNB,并能保留股四头肌的运动功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
44.80%
发文量
210
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信