Integrating pastured meat chickens into organic vegetable production increased nitrogen and microbial biomass with variability in presence of E. coli and Salmonella spp

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Moriah T. Bilenky, Ajay Nair, Marshall D. McDaniel, Angela M. Shaw, Elizabeth A. Bobeck, Kathleen Delate
{"title":"Integrating pastured meat chickens into organic vegetable production increased nitrogen and microbial biomass with variability in presence of E. coli and Salmonella spp","authors":"Moriah T. Bilenky, Ajay Nair, Marshall D. McDaniel, Angela M. Shaw, Elizabeth A. Bobeck, Kathleen Delate","doi":"10.1017/s1742170524000012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Integrating animals into a farm supports a closed or semi-closed production system where nutrients are recycled and off-farm inputs are reduced. In comparison to other livestock, chickens can be a low-investment option for animal-crop integration of small-scale, diversified, vegetable farms. Although crop-animal integration poses many potential benefits to farms, soils, and the environment, there are significant food safety risks when considering the production of vegetables in close proximity to raw manure. The objectives of this study were to examine the effects of poultry integration with meat chickens (broilers) in two different seasons on soil health, food safety, vegetable yield, and poultry feed efficiency in organic vegetable cropping systems. We explored these effects in an open field study with three rotation treatments (two that integrated chickens and a no-chicken control): vegetables-cover crop (V-CC; control treatment), vegetables-cover crop-poultry (V-CC-P), and vegetables-poultry-cover crop (V-P-CC). In response to crop rotation, over three years, we monitored soil nutrient status, soil microbial biomass carbon (MBC), permanganate oxidizable carbon (POXC), and microbial catabolic potential and diversity using Biolog® microplates. The presence or absence of foodborne pathogens in soil and vegetables was also measured. Nitrate–nitrogen (NO<span>3</span>–N) was higher in V-P-CC in year 2 as compared to both V-CC and V-CC-P (<span>P</span> = 0.001 and &lt;0.001, respectively). After poultry removal in the summer of year 2 and year 3 V-P-CC was on average two times higher in NO<span>3</span>–N as compared to V-CC and V-CC-P, respectively. After chicken removal in the autumn of year 3 V-CC-P was 2.1 and 1.8 times higher in NO<span>3</span>–N as compared to V-CC and V-P-CC, respectively. On average phosphorus (P) increased by 45% in year 2 and by 13.2% in year 3. Microbial biomass carbon (MBC) increased from after harvest (summer) in year 1 to the end of the season (autumn) of year 2 from 219.75 to 303.23 mg carbon (C) kg<span>−1</span>. Integrating poultry increased MBC by 25%, on average between both treatments across all sampling dates, compared to the V-CC (<span>P</span> = 0.042). The vegetable-cover crop control (V-CC) preferentially used carbohydrates, compared to V-P-CC which corresponded to greater amino acid usage. <span>Escherichia coli</span> O157:H7 was detected in all plots in the spring of year 3 and select replications of plots in the autumn of year 3. <span>Salmonella</span> spp. was found in one plot in year 2. No pathogens were detected on the spinach crop when leaf surfaces were tested. Integrating chickens into organic vegetable crop rotations increases NO<span>3</span>–N and has the potential for off-farm fertilizer reductions if time and stocking density are further examined. However, poultry feed is often an off-farm input and should be considered when determining the true N input of this system. Soil health may be improved, but MBC and other soil health indicators should be monitored with longer-term rotations. There are food safety risks that come with the integration of chickens into vegetable production and fields should be treated as if raw manure has been applied. Despite the potential benefits of integrating poultry into vegetable crop rotations, more research on these systems is required to determine optimum integration strategies that provide maximum benefit to the producer, the animals, and the environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":54495,"journal":{"name":"Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1742170524000012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Integrating animals into a farm supports a closed or semi-closed production system where nutrients are recycled and off-farm inputs are reduced. In comparison to other livestock, chickens can be a low-investment option for animal-crop integration of small-scale, diversified, vegetable farms. Although crop-animal integration poses many potential benefits to farms, soils, and the environment, there are significant food safety risks when considering the production of vegetables in close proximity to raw manure. The objectives of this study were to examine the effects of poultry integration with meat chickens (broilers) in two different seasons on soil health, food safety, vegetable yield, and poultry feed efficiency in organic vegetable cropping systems. We explored these effects in an open field study with three rotation treatments (two that integrated chickens and a no-chicken control): vegetables-cover crop (V-CC; control treatment), vegetables-cover crop-poultry (V-CC-P), and vegetables-poultry-cover crop (V-P-CC). In response to crop rotation, over three years, we monitored soil nutrient status, soil microbial biomass carbon (MBC), permanganate oxidizable carbon (POXC), and microbial catabolic potential and diversity using Biolog® microplates. The presence or absence of foodborne pathogens in soil and vegetables was also measured. Nitrate–nitrogen (NO3–N) was higher in V-P-CC in year 2 as compared to both V-CC and V-CC-P (P = 0.001 and <0.001, respectively). After poultry removal in the summer of year 2 and year 3 V-P-CC was on average two times higher in NO3–N as compared to V-CC and V-CC-P, respectively. After chicken removal in the autumn of year 3 V-CC-P was 2.1 and 1.8 times higher in NO3–N as compared to V-CC and V-P-CC, respectively. On average phosphorus (P) increased by 45% in year 2 and by 13.2% in year 3. Microbial biomass carbon (MBC) increased from after harvest (summer) in year 1 to the end of the season (autumn) of year 2 from 219.75 to 303.23 mg carbon (C) kg−1. Integrating poultry increased MBC by 25%, on average between both treatments across all sampling dates, compared to the V-CC (P = 0.042). The vegetable-cover crop control (V-CC) preferentially used carbohydrates, compared to V-P-CC which corresponded to greater amino acid usage. Escherichia coli O157:H7 was detected in all plots in the spring of year 3 and select replications of plots in the autumn of year 3. Salmonella spp. was found in one plot in year 2. No pathogens were detected on the spinach crop when leaf surfaces were tested. Integrating chickens into organic vegetable crop rotations increases NO3–N and has the potential for off-farm fertilizer reductions if time and stocking density are further examined. However, poultry feed is often an off-farm input and should be considered when determining the true N input of this system. Soil health may be improved, but MBC and other soil health indicators should be monitored with longer-term rotations. There are food safety risks that come with the integration of chickens into vegetable production and fields should be treated as if raw manure has been applied. Despite the potential benefits of integrating poultry into vegetable crop rotations, more research on these systems is required to determine optimum integration strategies that provide maximum benefit to the producer, the animals, and the environment.

将牧养肉鸡纳入有机蔬菜生产,增加了氮和微生物生物量,但大肠杆菌和沙门氏菌的存在有变化
将动物融入农场可支持封闭或半封闭的生产系统,使养分得到循环利用,减少农场外的投入。与其他牲畜相比,鸡是小规模、多样化蔬菜农场动物-作物一体化的低投资选择。虽然作物-动物一体化对农场、土壤和环境有许多潜在益处,但考虑到蔬菜生产与生鲜粪便的距离很近,因此存在很大的食品安全风险。本研究的目的是考察有机蔬菜种植系统中家禽与肉鸡(肉鸡)在两个不同季节的融合对土壤健康、食品安全、蔬菜产量和家禽饲料效率的影响。我们在一项露天田间研究中探讨了这些影响,该研究采用了三种轮作处理(两种结合养鸡处理和一种无鸡对照处理):蔬菜-覆盖作物(V-CC;对照处理)、蔬菜-覆盖作物-家禽(V-CC-P)和蔬菜-家禽-覆盖作物(V-P-CC)。针对轮作,我们在三年内使用 Biolog® 微孔板监测了土壤养分状况、土壤微生物生物量碳(MBC)、高锰酸盐氧化碳(POXC)以及微生物分解潜力和多样性。此外,还测量了土壤和蔬菜中是否存在食源性病原体。与 V-CC 和 V-CC-P 相比,第 2 年 V-P-CC 中的硝态氮(NO3-N)较高(P = 0.001 和 <0.001)。第 2 年和第 3 年夏季清除家禽后,V-P-CC 的 NO3-N 平均值分别是 V-CC 和 V-CC-P 的两倍。第 3 年秋季移走家禽后,V-CC-P 的 NO3-N 分别是 V-CC 和 V-P-CC 的 2.1 倍和 1.8 倍。磷(P)在第 2 年平均增加了 45%,在第 3 年平均增加了 13.2%。从第 1 年收获后(夏季)到第 2 年季节结束(秋季),微生物生物量碳(MBC)从 219.75 毫克碳(C)/千克增加到 303.23 毫克碳(C)/千克。与 V-CC 相比,在所有采样日期的两个处理中,家禽的加入使 MBC 平均增加了 25%(P = 0.042)。与 V-P-CC 相比,蔬菜-覆盖作物对照(V-CC)优先使用碳水化合物,而 V-P-CC 则更多地使用氨基酸。第 3 年春季,在所有地块中检测到大肠杆菌 O157:H7,第 3 年秋季,在部分重复地块中检测到大肠杆菌 O157:H7。第 2 年在一块地里发现了沙门氏菌。在对菠菜叶面进行检测时,未在菠菜作物上检测到病原体。在有机蔬菜轮作中养鸡可增加氮氧化物(NO3-N),如果进一步研究养鸡时间和饲养密度,有可能减少农场外的化肥用量。不过,家禽饲料通常是农场外的投入,在确定该系统的真正氮投入时应加以考虑。土壤健康可能会得到改善,但在长期轮作时应监测多溴联苯和其他土壤健康指标。将鸡纳入蔬菜生产会带来食品安全风险,应将田地当作施用了生粪肥处理。尽管将家禽与蔬菜作物轮作有潜在的好处,但仍需要对这些系统进行更多的研究,以确定能为生产者、动物和环境带来最大利益的最佳整合策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.40%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems (formerly American Journal of Alternative Agriculture) is a multi-disciplinary journal which focuses on the science that underpins economically, environmentally, and socially sustainable approaches to agriculture and food production. The journal publishes original research and review articles on the economic, ecological, and environmental impacts of agriculture; the effective use of renewable resources and biodiversity in agro-ecosystems; and the technological and sociological implications of sustainable food systems. It also contains a discussion forum, which presents lively discussions on new and provocative topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信