{"title":"Commerce with Montaigne","authors":"Jeffrey R. Di Leo","doi":"10.1353/abr.2023.a921772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Commerce with Montaigne <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Jeffrey R. Di Leo (bio) </li> </ul> <p>In 1676, the Catholic Church put Montaigne's <em>Essays</em> on the <em>Index Librorum Prohibitorum</em>. According to the <em>New Catholic Encyclopedia</em> (2003), the index, \"established in 1557 by Pope Paul IV, was a list of books that Catholics were prohibited from reading on pain of excommunication,\" it continues, \"because they contained material considered dangerous or contrary to faith or morals.\" The list would continue as Catholic doctrine until 1966, when Pope Paul VI abolished it on the grounds that it was \"contrary to the teaching of Vatican II concerning freedom of inquiry.\"</p> <br/> Click for larger view<br/> View full resolution Fig 1. <p>Replica of a card from the original Villanova University Library card catalog.</p> <p></p> <p>For those who doubt that this list meant very much before Vatican II abolished it, consider an exhibit from the Villanova University Library (Figure 1). Here we find a catalog card for an English translation of Montaigne's <em>Essays</em>, which is marked in italics \"On Church Index\" above the call number and author information. While professors could freely check out the <em>Essays</em>, students wanting to check it out \"had to report to the Library Director's office with a permission slip from their professor to request access to the book.\" The reason for its inclusion in the <em>Index</em> was apparently that it was contrary to the philosophy of Descartes, which dominated at the time and regarded animals as automata, whereas Montaigne regarded animals as capable of reason. The Catholic Church contended that Montaigne's doctrine on animal reason placed in peril the immortality of humans. Hence, almost three centuries later—and just a year before the summer of love—students at Villanova and presumably other Catholic universities in America needed a permission slip from their professors to check it out of the library. <strong>[End Page 1]</strong></p> <p>One wonders though how Catholic university professors in the 1960s came to the decision to allow—or deny—their students access to books such as Montaigne's <em>Essays</em> \"that Catholics were prohibited from reading on pain of excommunication.\" In addition, it is hard today not to think about such decisions in the context of zealous right-wing public library boards considering whether to allow—or deny—access to LGBTQ+ reading material. Whereas Vatican II eliminated the <em>Index</em> with the intention of freedom of inquiry, right-wing zealots are working hard today to reestablish a new version of it in public libraries across America. Nevertheless, it is still to be determined how comprehensive the <em>New Index Librorum Prohibitorum</em> will be—and if checking out Montaigne's <em>Essays</em> from your local public library will require presentation of a permission slip from a library board member to the director of the public library. After all, he does maintain that animals can reason, which I am sure is contrary to the faith or morals of some library board member—somewhere in America.</p> <h2>________</h2> <p>Late in his life, Montaigne wrote an essay titled \"De trois commerces\" (1585–88). It is essay 3 in book 3 of his <em>Essays</em>. Variously translated as \"Of Three Kinds of Intercourse\" (E. J. Trenchmann, 1927), \"Of Three Kinds of Association\" (Donald Frame, 1957), \"On Three Kinds of Social Intercourse\" (M. A. Screech, 1991), the title noted on the Vanderbilt Library catalog card was a much more literal one: \"Of Three Commerces\" (Charles Cotton, 1686). It is a very personal essay where Montaigne discusses the three forms of \"commerce\" that enrich his life and make it worth living.</p> <p>The first form of commerce involves friendship:</p> <blockquote> <p>The people whose society and intimacy I court are those they call refined and talented men, the idea of whom puts me out of liking for others. It is, if rightly understood, the rarest type with us, a type that is chiefly due to Nature. The aim of this commerce is simply frequent and intimate forgathering and conversation; the exercise of wits, without any other fruit. In our talks all subjects are alike to me; it matters little to me if there be neither gravity nor profundity in them; charm and pertinency are never wanting. <strong>[End Page 2]</strong></p> </blockquote> <p>But the commerce with friends that he writes about here differs drastically...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":41337,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN BOOK REVIEW","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMERICAN BOOK REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/abr.2023.a921772","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:
Commerce with Montaigne
Jeffrey R. Di Leo (bio)
In 1676, the Catholic Church put Montaigne's Essays on the Index Librorum Prohibitorum. According to the New Catholic Encyclopedia (2003), the index, "established in 1557 by Pope Paul IV, was a list of books that Catholics were prohibited from reading on pain of excommunication," it continues, "because they contained material considered dangerous or contrary to faith or morals." The list would continue as Catholic doctrine until 1966, when Pope Paul VI abolished it on the grounds that it was "contrary to the teaching of Vatican II concerning freedom of inquiry."
Click for larger view View full resolution Fig 1.
Replica of a card from the original Villanova University Library card catalog.
For those who doubt that this list meant very much before Vatican II abolished it, consider an exhibit from the Villanova University Library (Figure 1). Here we find a catalog card for an English translation of Montaigne's Essays, which is marked in italics "On Church Index" above the call number and author information. While professors could freely check out the Essays, students wanting to check it out "had to report to the Library Director's office with a permission slip from their professor to request access to the book." The reason for its inclusion in the Index was apparently that it was contrary to the philosophy of Descartes, which dominated at the time and regarded animals as automata, whereas Montaigne regarded animals as capable of reason. The Catholic Church contended that Montaigne's doctrine on animal reason placed in peril the immortality of humans. Hence, almost three centuries later—and just a year before the summer of love—students at Villanova and presumably other Catholic universities in America needed a permission slip from their professors to check it out of the library. [End Page 1]
One wonders though how Catholic university professors in the 1960s came to the decision to allow—or deny—their students access to books such as Montaigne's Essays "that Catholics were prohibited from reading on pain of excommunication." In addition, it is hard today not to think about such decisions in the context of zealous right-wing public library boards considering whether to allow—or deny—access to LGBTQ+ reading material. Whereas Vatican II eliminated the Index with the intention of freedom of inquiry, right-wing zealots are working hard today to reestablish a new version of it in public libraries across America. Nevertheless, it is still to be determined how comprehensive the New Index Librorum Prohibitorum will be—and if checking out Montaigne's Essays from your local public library will require presentation of a permission slip from a library board member to the director of the public library. After all, he does maintain that animals can reason, which I am sure is contrary to the faith or morals of some library board member—somewhere in America.
________
Late in his life, Montaigne wrote an essay titled "De trois commerces" (1585–88). It is essay 3 in book 3 of his Essays. Variously translated as "Of Three Kinds of Intercourse" (E. J. Trenchmann, 1927), "Of Three Kinds of Association" (Donald Frame, 1957), "On Three Kinds of Social Intercourse" (M. A. Screech, 1991), the title noted on the Vanderbilt Library catalog card was a much more literal one: "Of Three Commerces" (Charles Cotton, 1686). It is a very personal essay where Montaigne discusses the three forms of "commerce" that enrich his life and make it worth living.
The first form of commerce involves friendship:
The people whose society and intimacy I court are those they call refined and talented men, the idea of whom puts me out of liking for others. It is, if rightly understood, the rarest type with us, a type that is chiefly due to Nature. The aim of this commerce is simply frequent and intimate forgathering and conversation; the exercise of wits, without any other fruit. In our talks all subjects are alike to me; it matters little to me if there be neither gravity nor profundity in them; charm and pertinency are never wanting. [End Page 2]
But the commerce with friends that he writes about here differs drastically...
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: 杰弗里-R.-迪里奥(Jeffrey R. Di Leo)(简历 1676 年,天主教会将蒙田的《随笔集》列入《图书馆禁书索引》。根据《新天主教百科全书》(2003 年),该索引 "由教皇保罗四世于 1557 年制定,是一份禁止天主教徒阅读的书籍清单,违者将被逐出教会",它继续说道,"因为这些书籍包含被认为危险或违背信仰或道德的内容"。这份书单作为天主教教义一直延续到 1966 年,教皇保罗六世废除了这份书单,理由是它 "违背了梵二关于探究自由的教导"。 点击查看大图 查看完整分辨率 图 1.维拉诺瓦大学图书馆卡片目录的复制品。 如果有人怀疑这份目录在梵蒂冈二世废除之前意义不大,不妨看看维拉诺瓦大学图书馆的一件展品(图 1)。在这里,我们发现了一张蒙田《随笔》英译本的目录卡,在书名号和作者信息上方用斜体标注了 "关于教会索引"。虽然教授可以自由借阅《随笔》,但学生想要借阅它,"必须持教授的许可单到图书馆馆长办公室申请"。该书被列入索引的原因显然是它与当时占统治地位的笛卡尔哲学相悖,笛卡尔哲学将动物视为自动装置,而蒙田则认为动物具有理性。天主教会认为,蒙田关于动物理性的学说危及人类的永生。因此,在将近三个世纪之后--就在 "爱之夏 "的前一年--维拉诺瓦大学和美国其他天主教大学的学生要想从图书馆借阅这本书,需要得到教授的许可。[第 1 页完] 不过,我们不禁要问,20 世纪 60 年代的天主教大学教授是如何决定允许或拒绝他们的学生阅读蒙田的《随笔》等 "天主教徒不得阅读,否则将被逐出教会 "的书籍的。此外,今天我们很难不在热心的右翼公共图书馆委员会考虑是否允许或拒绝LGBTQ+阅读材料的背景下思考这些决定。梵二会议出于探究自由的目的取消了《索引》,而如今右翼狂热分子正努力在美国各地的公共图书馆重建新版《索引》。尽管如此,新版《图书馆禁书索引》的全面性如何,以及从当地公共图书馆借阅蒙田的《随笔集》是否需要向公共图书馆馆长出示图书馆董事会成员的许可单,仍有待确定。毕竟,他确实认为动物可以推理,而我确信这与美国某地图书馆董事会成员的信仰或道德是相悖的。________ 蒙田晚年写了一篇题为 "De trois commerces"(1585-88)的文章。这是他的散文集第 3 卷中的第 3 篇文章。这篇文章被翻译成 "Of Three Kinds of Intercourse"(E. J. Trenchmann,1927 年)、"Of Three Kinds of Association"(Donald Frame,1957 年)、"On Three Kinds of Social Intercourse"(M. A. Screech,1991 年)等不同译名,但范德比尔特图书馆目录卡上标注的书名则更为直白:"Of Three Commerces》(查尔斯-科顿,1686 年)。这是一篇非常个人化的文章,蒙田在文中讨论了三种形式的 "商业",这些商业丰富了他的生活,使他的生活更有意义。第一种形式的商业涉及友谊: 我所追求的社交和亲密的人,是那些他们称之为高雅和有才华的人,一想到他们,我就对其他人失去了好感。如果理解正确的话,这是我们最稀有的一种类型,这种类型主要归功于大自然。这种商业活动的目的仅仅是频繁而亲密的聚会和交谈,是智慧的锻炼,而没有任何其他的成果。在我们的谈话中,所有的话题对我来说都是一样的;对我来说,即使这些话题既不严肃也不深刻,也没有什么关系;魅力和针对性是永远不会缺少的。[第 2 页完] 但他在这里写到的与朋友的交往却大相径庭......