{"title":"From S-matrix theory to strings: Scattering data and the commitment to non-arbitrariness","authors":"Robert van Leeuwen","doi":"arxiv-2403.06690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The early history of string theory is marked by a shift from strong\ninteraction physics to quantum gravity. The first string models and associated\ntheoretical framework were formulated in the late 1960s and early 1970s in the\ncontext of the S-matrix program for the strong interactions. In the mid-1970s,\nthe models were reinterpreted as a potential theory unifying the four\nfundamental forces. This paper provides a historical analysis of how string\ntheory was developed out of S-matrix physics, aiming to clarify how modern\nstring theory, as a theory detached from experimental data, grew out of an\nS-matrix program that was strongly dependent upon observable quantities.\nSurprisingly, the theoretical practice of physicists already turned away from\nexperiment before string theory was recast as a potential unified quantum\ngravity theory. With the formulation of dual resonance models (the \"hadronic\nstring theory\"), physicists were able to determine almost all of the models'\nparameters on the basis of theoretical reasoning. It was this commitment to\n\"non-arbitrariness\", i.e., a lack of free parameters in the theory, that\ninitially drove string theorists away from experimental input, and not the\npractical inaccessibility of experimental data in the context of quantum\ngravity physics. This is an important observation when assessing the role of\nexperimental data in string theory.","PeriodicalId":501042,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - History and Philosophy of Physics","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - History and Philosophy of Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2403.06690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The early history of string theory is marked by a shift from strong
interaction physics to quantum gravity. The first string models and associated
theoretical framework were formulated in the late 1960s and early 1970s in the
context of the S-matrix program for the strong interactions. In the mid-1970s,
the models were reinterpreted as a potential theory unifying the four
fundamental forces. This paper provides a historical analysis of how string
theory was developed out of S-matrix physics, aiming to clarify how modern
string theory, as a theory detached from experimental data, grew out of an
S-matrix program that was strongly dependent upon observable quantities.
Surprisingly, the theoretical practice of physicists already turned away from
experiment before string theory was recast as a potential unified quantum
gravity theory. With the formulation of dual resonance models (the "hadronic
string theory"), physicists were able to determine almost all of the models'
parameters on the basis of theoretical reasoning. It was this commitment to
"non-arbitrariness", i.e., a lack of free parameters in the theory, that
initially drove string theorists away from experimental input, and not the
practical inaccessibility of experimental data in the context of quantum
gravity physics. This is an important observation when assessing the role of
experimental data in string theory.