Clinical Outcomes of Cardiogenic Shock Due to Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection Versus Cardiogenic Shock Due to Coronary Artery Disease.

Q3 Medicine
Critical Pathways in Cardiology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-11 DOI:10.1097/HPC.0000000000000354
Chayakrit Krittanawong, Yusuf Kamran Qadeer, Song Peng Ang, Zhen Wang, Mahboob Alam, Samin Sharma, Hani Jneid
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes of Cardiogenic Shock Due to Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection Versus Cardiogenic Shock Due to Coronary Artery Disease.","authors":"Chayakrit Krittanawong, Yusuf Kamran Qadeer, Song Peng Ang, Zhen Wang, Mahboob Alam, Samin Sharma, Hani Jneid","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) can be treated conservatively. However, some SCAD patients can develop cardiogenic shock (CS). We evaluated the outcomes of SCAD-related CS using data from a national population-based cohort study from January 1, 2016, to December 30, 2019. In our study of 32,640 patients with SCAD, about 10.6% of patients presented with CS. We found that SCAD patients with CS had higher mortality and greater complications including use of mechanical circulatory devices, arrhythmias, respiratory support, and acute heart failure compared to those without CS. When comparing CS due to SCAD with that due to coronary artery disease, we found that although mortality rates were similar, those with CS due to SCAD were associated with higher risk of use of mechanical circulatory support, major bleeding, blood transfusion, and respiratory failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"141-148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HPC.0000000000000354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) can be treated conservatively. However, some SCAD patients can develop cardiogenic shock (CS). We evaluated the outcomes of SCAD-related CS using data from a national population-based cohort study from January 1, 2016, to December 30, 2019. In our study of 32,640 patients with SCAD, about 10.6% of patients presented with CS. We found that SCAD patients with CS had higher mortality and greater complications including use of mechanical circulatory devices, arrhythmias, respiratory support, and acute heart failure compared to those without CS. When comparing CS due to SCAD with that due to coronary artery disease, we found that although mortality rates were similar, those with CS due to SCAD were associated with higher risk of use of mechanical circulatory support, major bleeding, blood transfusion, and respiratory failure.

自发性冠状动脉夹层导致的心源性休克与冠状动脉疾病导致的心源性休克的临床结果。
自发性冠状动脉夹层(SCAD)可采取保守治疗。然而,一些 SCAD 患者会出现心源性休克(CS)。我们利用 2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 30 日的全国人群队列研究数据,评估了 SCAD 相关 CS 的预后。在我们对 32640 名 SCAD 患者进行的研究中,约 10.6% 的患者出现了心源性休克。我们发现,与无心源性休克的患者相比,有心源性休克的 SCAD 患者死亡率更高,并发症也更多,包括使用机械循环装置、心律失常、呼吸支持和急性心力衰竭。在比较 SCAD 和冠状动脉疾病(CAD)导致的心源性休克时,我们发现虽然死亡率相似,但 SCAD 导致的心源性休克患者使用机械循环支持、大出血、输血和呼吸衰竭的风险更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Pathways in Cardiology
Critical Pathways in Cardiology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Critical Pathways in Cardiology provides a single source for the diagnostic and therapeutic protocols in use at hospitals worldwide for patients with cardiac disorders. The Journal presents critical pathways for specific diagnoses—complete with evidence-based rationales—and also publishes studies of these protocols" effectiveness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信