Evaluating Sepsis Bundle Compliance as a Predictor for Patient Outcomes at a Community Hospital: A Retrospective Study.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Journal of nursing care quality Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-11 DOI:10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000767
John R Lawrence, Ben Seiyon Lee, Adetokunbo I Fadahunsi, Bernice D Mowery
{"title":"Evaluating Sepsis Bundle Compliance as a Predictor for Patient Outcomes at a Community Hospital: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"John R Lawrence, Ben Seiyon Lee, Adetokunbo I Fadahunsi, Bernice D Mowery","doi":"10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinicians are encouraged to use the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services early management bundle for severe sepsis and septic shock (SEP-1); however, it is unclear whether this process measure improves patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether compliance with the SEP-1 bundle is a predictor of hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), and intensive care unit LOS at a suburban community hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 577 patients were included in the analysis. Compliance with the SEP-1 bundle was not a significant predictor for patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SEP-1 compliance may not equate with quality of health care. Efforts to comply with SEP-1 may help organizations develop systems and structures that improve patient outcomes. Health care leaders should evaluate strategies beyond SEP-1 compliance to ensure continuous improvement of outcomes for patients experiencing sepsis.</p>","PeriodicalId":16931,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing care quality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11116060/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nursing care quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000767","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinicians are encouraged to use the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services early management bundle for severe sepsis and septic shock (SEP-1); however, it is unclear whether this process measure improves patient outcomes.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether compliance with the SEP-1 bundle is a predictor of hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), and intensive care unit LOS at a suburban community hospital.

Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted.

Results: A total of 577 patients were included in the analysis. Compliance with the SEP-1 bundle was not a significant predictor for patient outcomes.

Conclusions: SEP-1 compliance may not equate with quality of health care. Efforts to comply with SEP-1 may help organizations develop systems and structures that improve patient outcomes. Health care leaders should evaluate strategies beyond SEP-1 compliance to ensure continuous improvement of outcomes for patients experiencing sepsis.

评估一家社区医院的败血症捆绑治疗依从性作为患者预后的预测因素:一项回顾性研究
背景:鼓励临床医生使用美国医疗保险与医疗补助服务中心的严重败血症和脓毒性休克早期管理捆绑方案(SEP-1),但目前尚不清楚这一流程措施是否能改善患者的预后。目的:本研究旨在评估在郊区社区医院中,遵守SEP-1捆绑方案是否能预测住院死亡率、住院时间(LOS)和重症监护室LOS:方法:进行一项回顾性观察研究:结果:共有 577 名患者被纳入分析。遵守 SEP-1 套件并不能显著预测患者的预后:结论:遵守 SEP-1 并不等同于医疗质量。遵守 SEP-1 的努力可能有助于医疗机构建立能改善患者预后的系统和结构。医疗保健领导者应评估 SEP-1 合规性之外的策略,以确保持续改善败血症患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Nursing Care Quality (JNCQ) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides practicing nurses as well as nurses who have leadership roles in nursing care quality programs with useful information regarding the application of quality principles and concepts in the practice setting. The journal offers a forum for the scholarly discussion of “real world” implementation of quality activities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信