Effect of metal artefact reduction level on the assessment of dental implant positioning by cone-beam computed tomography.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Camila Porto Capel, Raphael Jurca Gonçalves da Motta, Ruben Pauwels, Hugo Gaêta-Araujo, Christiano Oliveira-Santos, Camila Tirapelli
{"title":"Effect of metal artefact reduction level on the assessment of dental implant positioning by cone-beam computed tomography.","authors":"Camila Porto Capel, Raphael Jurca Gonçalves da Motta, Ruben Pauwels, Hugo Gaêta-Araujo, Christiano Oliveira-Santos, Camila Tirapelli","doi":"10.1093/dmfr/twae008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluated the effect of metal artefact reduction (MAR) level and tube current on the assessment of dental implant positioning relative to the mandibular canal (MC) through cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Titanium dental implants were placed in dried mandibles at 0.5-mm superior to the MC (group 1/n = 8) and 0.5-mm inside the MC with perforation of the cortex (group 2/n = 10). CBCT scans were obtained with different levels of MAR (off, medium, and high) and 2 tube currents (4 and 8 mA). Four examiners analysed the images and scored the contact between the implant and the MC using a 5-point scale. Sensitivity, specificity, area under receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), and frequency of scores were calculated. Data were compared with analysis of variance 2-way and Tukey's test and scores with Chi-square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Specificity and area under ROC curve decreased significantly when MAR level was high compared with MAR-medium and MAR-off. The frequency of score 3 (inconclusive) was the highest, and scores 1 and 5 (definitely no contact and definitely contact, respectively) were the lowest with MAR-high, regardless of the tube current. When MAR was off, there were higher frequencies of scores 1 and 5.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The level of MAR influences the assessment of the relationship between the dental implant and the MC. MAR-high led to lower diagnostic accuracy compared with MAR-medium and off.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>This article shows that high level of MAR can interfere in the diagnostic of dental implant positioning relative to the MC, decreasing its accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":" ","pages":"233-239"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11056797/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twae008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluated the effect of metal artefact reduction (MAR) level and tube current on the assessment of dental implant positioning relative to the mandibular canal (MC) through cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Methods: Titanium dental implants were placed in dried mandibles at 0.5-mm superior to the MC (group 1/n = 8) and 0.5-mm inside the MC with perforation of the cortex (group 2/n = 10). CBCT scans were obtained with different levels of MAR (off, medium, and high) and 2 tube currents (4 and 8 mA). Four examiners analysed the images and scored the contact between the implant and the MC using a 5-point scale. Sensitivity, specificity, area under receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), and frequency of scores were calculated. Data were compared with analysis of variance 2-way and Tukey's test and scores with Chi-square test.

Results: Specificity and area under ROC curve decreased significantly when MAR level was high compared with MAR-medium and MAR-off. The frequency of score 3 (inconclusive) was the highest, and scores 1 and 5 (definitely no contact and definitely contact, respectively) were the lowest with MAR-high, regardless of the tube current. When MAR was off, there were higher frequencies of scores 1 and 5.

Conclusions: The level of MAR influences the assessment of the relationship between the dental implant and the MC. MAR-high led to lower diagnostic accuracy compared with MAR-medium and off.

Advances in knowledge: This article shows that high level of MAR can interfere in the diagnostic of dental implant positioning relative to the MC, decreasing its accuracy.

降低金属伪影水平对锥形束计算机断层扫描评估牙科种植体定位的影响。
目的:本研究通过锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)评估金属伪影减少(MAR)水平和管电流对牙科种植体相对于下颌管(MC)定位的影响:在干燥的下颌骨中植入钛种植体,种植体位于下颌管上方 0.5 毫米处(1/n = 8 组),位于下颌管内 0.5 毫米处,皮质穿孔(2/n = 10 组)。CBCT 扫描采用不同的 MAR 水平(关、中、高)和两种管电流(4 mA 和 8 mA)。四名检查人员对图像进行分析,并采用 5 级评分法对种植体与 MC 之间的接触情况进行评分。计算灵敏度、特异性、接收器操作特征曲线下面积(ROC)和评分频率。数据比较采用方差分析双向和 Tukey's 检验,评分采用 Chi-Square 检验:结果:与MAR-medium和MAR-off相比,当MAR水平高时,特异性和ROC曲线下面积明显下降。在 MAR 高的情况下,得分 3(不确定)的频率最高,得分 1 和 5(分别为肯定没有接触和肯定接触)的频率最低,与管电流无关。当 MAR 关闭时,得 1 分和 5 分的频率较高:结论:MAR 的高低会影响对牙科种植体与 MC 之间关系的评估。结论:MAR 水平影响牙科种植体与 MC 之间关系的评估,与 MAR 中等和关闭相比,MAR 高导致诊断准确率较低:本文表明,高MAR水平会干扰牙种植体相对于下颌管的定位诊断,从而降低其准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
65
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging. Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology. The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919 - Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks - Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks - Open access option - ISSN: 0250-832X - eISSN: 1476-542X
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信