Examining the relationships between cognition and auditory hallucinations: A systematic review.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Adrienne Bell, Wei Lin Toh, Paul Allen, Matteo Cella, Renaud Jardri, Frank Larøi, Peter Moseley, Susan L Rossell
{"title":"Examining the relationships between cognition and auditory hallucinations: A systematic review.","authors":"Adrienne Bell, Wei Lin Toh, Paul Allen, Matteo Cella, Renaud Jardri, Frank Larøi, Peter Moseley, Susan L Rossell","doi":"10.1177/00048674241235849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Auditory hallucinations (hearing voices) have been associated with a range of altered cognitive functions, pertaining to signal detection, source-monitoring, memory, inhibition and language processes. Yet, empirical results are inconsistent. Despite this, several theoretical models of auditory hallucinations persist, alongside increasing emphasis on the utility of a multidimensional framework. Thus, clarification of current evidence across the broad scope of proposed mechanisms is warranted.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic search of the Web of Science, PubMed and Scopus databases was conducted. Records were screened to confirm the use of an objective behavioural cognitive task, and valid measurement of hallucinations specific to the auditory modality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Auditory hallucinations were primarily associated with difficulties in perceptual decision-making (i.e. reduced sensitivity/accuracy for signal-noise discrimination; liberal responding to ambiguity), source-monitoring (i.e. self-other and temporal context confusion), working memory and language function (i.e. reduced verbal fluency). Mixed or limited support was observed for perceptual feature discrimination, imagery vividness/illusion susceptibility, source-monitoring for stimulus form and spatial context, recognition and recall memory, executive functions (e.g. attention, inhibition), emotion processing and language comprehension/hemispheric organisation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings were considered within predictive coding and self-monitoring frameworks. Of concern was the portion of studies which - despite offering auditory-hallucination-specific aims and inferences - employed modality-general measures, and/or diagnostic-based contrasts with psychologically healthy individuals. This review highlights disparities within the literature between theoretical conceptualisations of auditory hallucinations and the body of rigorous empirical evidence supporting such inferences. Future cognitive investigations, beyond the schizophrenia-spectrum, which explicitly define and measure the timeframe and sensory modality of hallucinations, are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":8589,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"467-497"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11128145/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674241235849","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Auditory hallucinations (hearing voices) have been associated with a range of altered cognitive functions, pertaining to signal detection, source-monitoring, memory, inhibition and language processes. Yet, empirical results are inconsistent. Despite this, several theoretical models of auditory hallucinations persist, alongside increasing emphasis on the utility of a multidimensional framework. Thus, clarification of current evidence across the broad scope of proposed mechanisms is warranted.

Method: A systematic search of the Web of Science, PubMed and Scopus databases was conducted. Records were screened to confirm the use of an objective behavioural cognitive task, and valid measurement of hallucinations specific to the auditory modality.

Results: Auditory hallucinations were primarily associated with difficulties in perceptual decision-making (i.e. reduced sensitivity/accuracy for signal-noise discrimination; liberal responding to ambiguity), source-monitoring (i.e. self-other and temporal context confusion), working memory and language function (i.e. reduced verbal fluency). Mixed or limited support was observed for perceptual feature discrimination, imagery vividness/illusion susceptibility, source-monitoring for stimulus form and spatial context, recognition and recall memory, executive functions (e.g. attention, inhibition), emotion processing and language comprehension/hemispheric organisation.

Conclusions: Findings were considered within predictive coding and self-monitoring frameworks. Of concern was the portion of studies which - despite offering auditory-hallucination-specific aims and inferences - employed modality-general measures, and/or diagnostic-based contrasts with psychologically healthy individuals. This review highlights disparities within the literature between theoretical conceptualisations of auditory hallucinations and the body of rigorous empirical evidence supporting such inferences. Future cognitive investigations, beyond the schizophrenia-spectrum, which explicitly define and measure the timeframe and sensory modality of hallucinations, are recommended.

研究认知与幻听之间的关系:系统回顾。
目的:听幻觉(幻听)与一系列认知功能的改变有关,涉及信号检测、信号源监测、记忆、抑制和语言过程。然而,实证结果并不一致。尽管如此,关于幻听的几种理论模型仍然存在,同时也越来越强调多维框架的实用性。因此,有必要对当前广泛的拟议机制证据进行澄清:对 Web of Science、PubMed 和 Scopus 数据库进行了系统检索。对记录进行了筛选,以确认是否使用了客观的行为认知任务,以及对听觉模式特定幻觉的有效测量:结果:听觉幻觉主要与感知决策困难(即对信号-噪声辨别的敏感性/准确性降低;对模糊性反应迟钝)、来源监测(即自我-他者和时间背景混淆)、工作记忆和语言功能(即言语流畅性降低)有关。在知觉特征辨别、意象生动性/幻觉易感性、刺激形式和空间背景的源监控、识别和回忆记忆、执行功能(如注意力、抑制)、情绪处理和语言理解/半球组织方面,观察到的支持是混合的或有限的:研究结果在预测编码和自我监控框架内进行了审议。值得关注的是,部分研究尽管提供了针对听觉幻觉的目标和推论,但却采用了一般模式测量和/或基于诊断的方法,与心理健康的个体进行对比。本综述强调了文献中关于幻听的理论概念与支持此类推论的严谨实证之间的差异。建议今后在精神分裂症谱系之外开展认知调查,明确界定并测量幻觉的时间范围和感官模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
149
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is the official Journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP). The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is a monthly journal publishing original articles which describe research or report opinions of interest to psychiatrists. These contributions may be presented as original research, reviews, perspectives, commentaries and letters to the editor. The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is the leading psychiatry journal of the Asia-Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信