An economy of immunity: The racial-spatial lives of antibodies in the American blood plasma economy from 1960s prisons to COVID-19

IF 3.3 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Kelsey Johnson
{"title":"An economy of immunity: The racial-spatial lives of antibodies in the American blood plasma economy from 1960s prisons to COVID-19","authors":"Kelsey Johnson","doi":"10.1111/tran.12679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2020, a market in convalescent blood plasma developed as a potential treatment for COVID-19. During this time, commercial plasma centres—which collect the blood plasma from paid donors for pharmaceutical production—paid recovered patients as much as US$100 for a donation of blood plasma containing COVID-19 antibodies, from which they manufactured an experimental treatment. This paper uses the commercial collection of COVID-19 antibodies found in plasma as an entry point into exploring how racially uneven exposures to disease may produce biovalue. The first section considers the spatial history of antibody-derived plasma products, using historical research to examine how inmates at predominantly black plantation-prisons in the US South were valued for antibody production in the 1960s. Against this historical relief, the second section examines the spatiality of antibodies in current practices of the plasma industry, as well as in the plasma industry's response to the COVID-19 pandemic (even as those efforts eventually failed in clinical trials). If geographical literatures on environmental exposure, as well as on COVID-19 transmission, discuss exposure as an outcome of racial capitalism, this paper emphasises the productive opportunities that capital can solicit from exposures, especially those that are useful to different forms of biomedicine. By critically scrutinising the practice of ‘sharing immunity’ and attending to its decidedly geographic constitution, we can see how what Ruth Wilson Gilmore calls the ‘death-dealing logics’ of racial capitalism may also work through the seemingly affirmative practices and communal imaginaries behind the redistribution of antibodies as medicine.","PeriodicalId":48278,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12679","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2020, a market in convalescent blood plasma developed as a potential treatment for COVID-19. During this time, commercial plasma centres—which collect the blood plasma from paid donors for pharmaceutical production—paid recovered patients as much as US$100 for a donation of blood plasma containing COVID-19 antibodies, from which they manufactured an experimental treatment. This paper uses the commercial collection of COVID-19 antibodies found in plasma as an entry point into exploring how racially uneven exposures to disease may produce biovalue. The first section considers the spatial history of antibody-derived plasma products, using historical research to examine how inmates at predominantly black plantation-prisons in the US South were valued for antibody production in the 1960s. Against this historical relief, the second section examines the spatiality of antibodies in current practices of the plasma industry, as well as in the plasma industry's response to the COVID-19 pandemic (even as those efforts eventually failed in clinical trials). If geographical literatures on environmental exposure, as well as on COVID-19 transmission, discuss exposure as an outcome of racial capitalism, this paper emphasises the productive opportunities that capital can solicit from exposures, especially those that are useful to different forms of biomedicine. By critically scrutinising the practice of ‘sharing immunity’ and attending to its decidedly geographic constitution, we can see how what Ruth Wilson Gilmore calls the ‘death-dealing logics’ of racial capitalism may also work through the seemingly affirmative practices and communal imaginaries behind the redistribution of antibodies as medicine.
免疫经济:从20世纪60年代的监狱到COVID-19,美国血浆经济中抗体的种族空间生活
2020 年,作为 COVID-19 的一种潜在治疗方法,康复血浆市场发展起来。在此期间,商业血浆中心从有偿捐献者那里收集血浆用于制药生产,他们为康复患者捐献含有 COVID-19 抗体的血浆支付高达 100 美元的费用,并从中制造实验性治疗药物。本文以血浆中 COVID-19 抗体的商业收集为切入点,探讨种族间不均衡的疾病接触如何产生生物价值。第一部分探讨了抗体血浆产品的空间历史,利用历史研究来考察 20 世纪 60 年代美国南部以黑人为主的种植园监狱中的囚犯如何因生产抗体而受到重视。在这一历史背景下,第二部分研究了抗体在当前血浆工业实践中的空间性,以及血浆工业对 COVID-19 大流行的反应(即使这些努力最终在临床试验中失败)。如果说关于环境暴露和 COVID-19 传播的地理文献将暴露作为种族资本主义的结果来讨论,那么本文则强调资本可以从暴露中获得生产机会,尤其是那些对不同形式的生物医学有用的暴露。通过批判性地审视 "共享免疫 "的实践并关注其明显的地理构成,我们可以看到露丝-威尔逊-吉尔摩(Ruth Wilson Gilmore)所称的种族资本主义的 "死亡交易逻辑 "是如何通过抗体作为药物的再分配背后看似肯定的实践和社区想象发挥作用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Transactions is one of the foremost international journals of geographical research. It publishes the very best scholarship from around the world and across the whole spectrum of research in the discipline. In particular, the distinctive role of the journal is to: • Publish "landmark· articles that make a major theoretical, conceptual or empirical contribution to the advancement of geography as an academic discipline. • Stimulate and shape research agendas in human and physical geography. • Publish articles, "Boundary crossing" essays and commentaries that are international and interdisciplinary in their scope and content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信